Insurable Risks: Are Investments Worth The Gamble?

Investments are a classic example of speculative risks, which rarely fall under commercial insurance coverage. Speculative risks are those that may result in either a profit or a loss, such as business ventures or gambling transactions. They lack the core elements of insurability. Insurable risks are those that insurance companies will cover, such as health issues, danger to life, fire, and perils of the sea. These risks must meet certain conditions to be insurable and not place the insurer at a disadvantage.

Speculative risks are almost never insured

Speculative risks are those that have three possible outcomes: nothing happens, a loss occurs, or a gain/profit is made. These risks are the result of intentional decisions rather than uncontrollable circumstances. They are almost never insured by insurance companies because they lack the core elements of insurability.

Speculative risks include the possibility of gain or profit, and the exposure to them is always a choice. For example, no one would choose to experience a house fire or a car accident, but everyone who invests in a company or bets on a sports game has consciously chosen to expose themselves to a speculative risk.

Ironically, it is the possibility of winning that makes these activities unsuitable for insurance coverage. This is due to the aspect of human nature known as moral hazard, which is the lack of incentive to guard against risk when protected from its consequences. If you could insure against losses on sports betting, for instance, you would have no incentive to bet moderately or try to improve your odds by studying the teams and players.

Speculative risks are also unpredictable. They are not statistically analysable, and the risk of loss is unknowable. Insurance companies require risks to be predictable so that they can estimate how often a loss might occur and how severe that loss might be.

Speculative risks include gambling and investments. Gambling is the best example of a speculative risk. When you enter a casino with $100, there are three possible outcomes: you leave with $100 (nothing happened), $1,000 (something good happened), or $0 (something bad happened). Investing in the stock market is another common example of a speculative risk.

In contrast, pure risks have only two possible outcomes: either nothing will happen, or the value of the insured subject will be lost. Pure risks are uncontrollable circumstances and are the basis of all insurance underwriting. They can be evaluated based on empirical data, and a premium can be set based on the value at risk. Most pure risks are insurable.

Insurers require proof of loss before agreeing to pay for damages

As mentioned earlier, investments are generally classified as speculative risks, which are not typically covered by insurance companies. Speculative risks are those that may result in either a profit or a loss, such as business ventures or gambling.

Now, when it comes to insurers requiring proof of loss before agreeing to pay for damages, this is indeed a standard procedure. A "proof of loss" is a formal, legal document that outlines the amount of money the policyholder is requesting from the insurance company, along with detailed information and supporting evidence regarding the claimed damages. This document is typically required by insurers before they agree to release any funds to the policyholder. Here are some key points to consider:

Submission of Proof of Loss

The policyholder is responsible for submitting a proof of loss document to the insurer. This document should include information such as the amount of loss claimed, supporting documentation for the loss, the date of the loss, and the identity of the party claiming the loss. It is important to carefully review the insurance policy to understand the specific requirements for the proof of loss, as they may vary across different insurers.

Insurer's Review and Response

Once the proof of loss is submitted, the insurer will review the document and respond with either acceptance or rejection. If the proof of loss is rejected, it is usually due to incomplete or incorrect paperwork, missing signatures or notarization, or insufficient information. The insurer will provide specific reasons for the rejection and instructions on how to rectify the issues.

Compliance and Agreement

Before an insurer is obligated to release the payment, certain conditions must be met. These typically include the submission of a proof of loss, an agreement between the insured and the insurer on the amount of loss (or an appraisal award), and a specified period after the submission of the proof of loss (often 30, 60, or 90 days). It is important to refer to the specific policy language to understand these requirements.

Interim Payments and Final Proof of Loss

In some cases, insurers may provide an advance or interim payment to help the policyholder cover immediate expenses and begin the recovery process. This is particularly relevant for larger losses or when there is a dispute over the final amount. Policyholders should be aware that they may not need to sign off on a final proof of loss to obtain funds, and they can request an interim proof of loss to receive a portion of the funds while considering their options.

Unfair Pressure and Legal Duty

It is important to note that insurers should not demand a final proof of loss while withholding all forms of payment. This can be seen as an unfair pressure tactic, especially for homeowners dealing with serious losses. Insurers have a legal duty to act with the utmost good faith and not take advantage of vulnerable policyholders. Policyholders have the right to receive at least some funds while resolving their insurance claim.

Timely Submission and Accuracy

Policyholders should aim to submit the proof of loss document in a timely manner, as this may expedite the claims process. It is also crucial to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the proof of loss. Minor errors or omissions can lead to problems and delays in the claims process.

Insurers will not cover risks that are too costly

Insurers need to make a profit to survive, so they will only cover risks that allow them to yield a profit. They will deem a risk insurable if they can charge a premium that covers possible claims and operating expenses while making a profit.

A risk must be a financial threat large enough for the company to be willing to protect itself against it by paying a premium. If a risk is too costly, insurers will not cover it.

Insurers use data and statistics to gauge the probability and extent of potential losses. When they cannot reliably predict losses or if the risk is too expensive to take on, they deem it uninsurable.

For example, losses from natural disasters in very high-risk areas, such as coastal flooding, are often not covered by insurers because the potential losses are too vast. Similarly, war and nuclear risks are typically considered too extreme and unpredictable for insurers to manage.

Insurers also avoid covering risks where moral hazard is high, as it increases the likelihood of a claim. For instance, an individual with theft insurance might take fewer precautions to secure their property, knowing they are covered.

Insurers are also reluctant to cover risks that are too obvious or too far in the future. They need to be able to estimate how often particular losses might occur and the expected severity of these losses. Losses that occur more frequently and tend to be more severe will drive higher premiums.

Additionally, insurers will not cover risks that are too easily manipulated or impossible to value. For example, reputational risk is challenging to value, and regulatory compliance is tricky to predict and price.

In summary, insurers will not cover risks that are too costly, unpredictable, or catastrophic. They need to ensure that the premium they charge is sufficient to cover potential claims and expenses while still making a profit. When a risk is too expensive or difficult to predict, they will deem it uninsurable.

Pure risks are insurable, speculative risks are not

Pure risks are generally insurable because they contain most or all of the elements of an insurable risk. These elements include "due to chance", definiteness and measurability, statistical predictability, lack of catastrophic exposure, random selection, and large loss exposure. For example, if someone damages a car in an accident, there is no chance that the result will be a gain. Since the outcome of that event can only result in a loss, it is a pure risk.

On the other hand, speculative risks, such as investments, are not usually insurable. This is because they lack the core elements of insurability. Speculative risks are typically the result of intentional decisions, rather than uncontrollable circumstances. They offer an uncertain degree of gain or loss. For example, investing in the stock market is a speculative risk as there is only the possibility of profit or loss.

Insurance companies require policyholders to submit proof of loss before agreeing to pay for damages. Losses that occur more frequently or have higher benefits normally have a higher premium.

Insurers will not cover risks that are too easily manipulated

For a risk to be insurable, it must meet certain criteria. Firstly, the exposure must be a significant financial threat or costly enough that the insured is willing to pay a premium to protect against it. Secondly, the risk must be statistically predictable, allowing insurers to estimate how often and how severe the loss will be. Thirdly, the risk must be common, with enough policyholders facing the same risk so that all policyholders can share the burden of damages. Fourthly, the risk must be random and outside the control of the policyholder. Finally, the risk must be clearly defined with a measurable value that cannot be influenced by the insured.

If a risk is too easily manipulated, it fails to meet these criteria. The risk may be too unpredictable, with too much influence from the policyholder, or too difficult to assign a measurable value. As a result, insurers will deny coverage for these types of risks.

It's important to note that insurance is a complex topic, and the line between insurable and uninsurable risks can be blurry. Each insurer may have different criteria for determining the insurability of a risk. However, when the probability of a costly risk occurring is higher than the likelihood that it won't, insurers generally reject coverage.

Frequently asked questions