Federal Employees: Bitcoin Investment Options

Bitcoin is a digital currency that operates without the need for a central bank or government, instead using a decentralised digital ledger known as the blockchain. Due to its decentralised nature, Bitcoin has been criticised and misunderstood by governments and centralised authorities, who are concerned about its potential misuse by terrorist organisations, money launderers and drug smugglers. In the US, federal employees face restrictions when it comes to investing in assets of large valuation, and in 2022, an ethics watchdog barred federal employees who own crypto from working on policies that could influence the value of their digital assets. This has raised the question of whether federal employees are permitted to invest in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies at all.

The ethics of federal employees investing in Bitcoin

Rules and Regulations

One of the key challenges in this area is the lack of clear and comprehensive regulations surrounding cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. In the United States, the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) plays a crucial role in providing guidance to federal employees. According to a legal advisory notice issued by the OGE in 2022, federal employees who own cryptocurrencies are barred from working on policies that could influence the value of their digital assets. This directive applies to all White House staff and employees of federal agencies, including the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department. The OGE's advisory notice specifically addresses the issue of conflicts of interest, aiming to ensure that federal employees' personal investments do not influence their work on crypto-related policies and regulations.

Reporting Requirements and Transparency

Government employees, particularly in the United States, often face restrictions when it comes to investing in the stock market, real estate, or any asset of large valuation. The Central Civil Service Rule 16 (Conduct Rules) of 1964 in India, for example, prohibits government servants from speculating in any stock, share, or other investments. While this rule allows for occasional investments made through authorized channels, frequent investments for short-term gains are deemed speculation and are prohibited. Federal employees are generally required to report their crypto holdings and investments to maintain transparency and comply with ethical standards.

Security Concerns

The decentralized nature of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies has raised security concerns among government agencies. Bitcoin transactions are recorded on a blockchain, a digital ledger that is open for anyone to see and add to. While this technology offers benefits in terms of transparency and traceability, it also creates opportunities for illicit activities. Bitcoin has been associated with money laundering, drug smuggling, and terrorist financing. As a result, federal employees investing in Bitcoin may face additional scrutiny to ensure they are not inadvertently contributing to criminal activities or violating security protocols.

Impact on Clearance Status

The unique characteristics of Bitcoin, such as its decentralized nature and encryption, can have implications for federal employees' security clearance status. Security officers consider various adjudicative criteria when granting clearances, and some aspects of Bitcoin that appeal to users for their privacy and independence from central authorities may also raise red flags for investigators. For example, the use of encrypted codes for transactions could potentially be exploited by terrorists, drug dealers, and other illicit actors to hide their financial dealings. As a result, federal employees heavily invested in Bitcoin may face questions about their foreign influences, foreign financial interests, and appropriate use of information technology.

In conclusion, while federal employees may not be explicitly prohibited from investing in Bitcoin, they must navigate a complex ethical landscape. The lack of clear regulations, potential conflicts of interest, security concerns, and the impact on clearance status all contribute to the challenges faced by federal employees interested in this new and often misunderstood digital currency. As the world continues to shift towards digital technology and decentralized systems, the ethical considerations for federal employees investing in Bitcoin will likely remain a dynamic and evolving issue.

The security clearance implications of Bitcoin investments

Bitcoin is a decentralised digital currency that keeps track of who owns what. It is stored in a digital ledger (the blockchain) that is open for anyone to see and add to with every transaction. This means that instead of needing a government or a bank as a third party, transactions occur directly between people anywhere in the world.

Each user exchanges value using an encrypted code unique to them, which is great for people who value their privacy. However, terrorists, drug dealers, and other illicit agents also value their privacy and want to keep their financial dealings away from the authorities. As a result, you could inadvertently contribute to criminal activity, risking a violation of the "Criminal Conduct" guideline.

The decentralised nature of Bitcoin also means its value is not affected by the whims of any government or central authority. While this is appealing to investors, it also makes Bitcoin suspect in the security clearance process. Possessing a large amount of a foreign currency might send up red flags, so being "Bitcoin-rich" raises similar questions. For example, are you partnered with foreign investors or do you have foreign financial interests that could influence your work? All of these could colour the "Foreign Influence" and "Foreign Preference" criteria.

Additionally, the fact that Bitcoin and the federal government are historical enemies further complicates the matter. Arguments over who should control the value, production, and flow of currency are as old as the country itself. Given this history of decentralised currency, the government's natural instinct is to be suspicious of Bitcoin, and as a result, the security clearance process probably will be too, at least until there is more clarity on how to approach it.

In conclusion, while Bitcoin investments may not currently affect your security clearance, that may change in the future. The decentralised and encrypted nature of Bitcoin raises concerns about foreign influence and criminal conduct. As a result, federal employees must carefully consider the potential implications of investing in Bitcoin and remain cautious until further guidance is provided.

The impact of Bitcoin investments on federal employees' eligibility to work on crypto-related policies

Bitcoin and blockchain technology have revolutionized the world of finance and digital assets, but they have also raised concerns among governments and centralized authorities. The decentralized nature of Bitcoin, which allows for direct peer-to-peer transactions without the need for intermediaries like banks, has been a point of contention. While it offers individuals greater privacy and freedom, it also creates opportunities for illicit activities such as money laundering, drug smuggling, and terrorist financing. As a result, governments are faced with the challenge of regulating this new technology to prevent misuse while also recognizing its potential benefits.

In the United States, federal employees face restrictions when it comes to investing in certain assets, including the stock market, real estate, and cryptocurrencies. The Central Civil Service Rule-16 (Conduct Rules) of 1964 prohibits government servants from speculating in any stock, share, or other investments, with an exception for occasional investments made through authorized channels. This rule is in place to prevent the misuse of authority and the potential for political gain through these investments.

The unique characteristics of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have further complicated the situation for federal employees. On one hand, the decentralized nature of Bitcoin, free from the control of any central authority, can raise questions about foreign influence and preference, especially when it comes to national security and clearance processes. On the other hand, the high level of privacy and encryption offered by Bitcoin can make it difficult to track and regulate transactions, potentially enabling criminal conduct.

Recognizing these concerns, the U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE) issued a legal advisory notice in July 2022, barring federal workers who own crypto from working on policies that could influence the value of their digital assets. This directive applies to all White House staff and employees of federal agencies, including the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department. The de minimis exemption, which allows individuals with small holdings of a security to work on related policies, does not apply to cryptocurrencies, even if they are considered securities under federal or state laws.

The impact of this directive is significant, as it directly affects the eligibility of federal employees with crypto investments to work on crypto-related policies. For example, Tim Wu, a technology adviser to the Biden administration with millions of dollars in bitcoin investments, has voluntarily recused himself from working on crypto policy. The directive also highlights the need for transparency and disclosure of crypto holdings by federal employees, ensuring that potential conflicts of interest are identified and addressed.

The legal status of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies

In the US, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) considers Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies to be property and has issued guidelines for taxpayers. The US Treasury classified Bitcoin as a convertible decentralized virtual currency in 2013, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) classified it as a commodity in September 2015.

Some countries have taken a more restrictive approach. China, for example, has heavily restricted Bitcoin without actually criminalizing its possession. India banned banks from dealing in Bitcoin and left the overall legal status of cryptocurrencies unclear. Pakistan has not officially regulated cryptocurrencies, but there have been arrests made by the Cyber Crime Wing of the Federal Investigation Agency related to Bitcoin mining and trading under money-laundering charges.

Other countries have taken a more favorable approach. El Salvador, for instance, was the first country to recognize Bitcoin as legal tender in June 2021. Uzbekistan also passed a decree legalizing crypto trading and mining, making it a crypto-friendly state.

The potential misuse of Bitcoin by criminal and terrorist organisations

Bitcoin is a decentralised digital currency that keeps track of who has what. It is stored and recorded in a digital ledger (blockchain) that is open for anyone to see and add to with every transaction. This means that, unlike traditional currencies, Bitcoin does not need a third party, like a bank, to verify transactions. This makes it appealing to those who value their privacy, such as terrorists, drug dealers, and other illicit agents.

Bitcoin's decentralised nature also means that its value is not affected by the decisions of any government or central authority. This makes it attractive to investors but also to criminal and terrorist organisations, as it is harder to regulate. The blockchain is open-source, and there is no need to exchange currencies, making it easier to buy things overseas.

While there is no indication that Bitcoin has been adopted by any terrorist organisation on an institutional level, there are cases where terrorists have used digital currencies. For example, in 2014, reports emerged of Islamic State fighters in Raqqa, Syria, facilitating small or domestic purchases in money transfer offices and conducting long-distance international transactions using digital currencies like Bitcoin. In the same year, a key Islamic State fundraiser, Abu-Mustafa, raised five bitcoins, valued at approximately $1,000, before the account was closed. In 2015, a 17-year-old from Virginia, Shukri Amin, was convicted of helping Islamic State supporters travel to Syria through the use of social media sites, where they were encouraged to contribute Bitcoin to the group. In 2017, a woman was arrested in New York for obtaining $62,000 in Bitcoin to send to Islamic State.

Bitcoin is often associated with criminal activities, including money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The Federal Reserve and European Central Bank have stated that Bitcoin is a highly speculative asset used in illegal financing activities, and a global regulatory consensus on Bitcoin is required. Terrorist organisations, including the Islamic State, use emerging technologies, such as blockchain, to raise and transfer illegal funds.

The anonymity of Bitcoin is a significant factor in the financing activities of terrorist organisations. Anonymity ensures that the funds are difficult to trace, and an increase in anonymity will promote terrorist organisations' use of cryptocurrencies. Not only can terrorists benefit from the anonymity of cryptocurrency, but organisations or individuals that try to support terrorism through donations can also reduce their risk of being prosecuted.

However, it is important to note that the use of Bitcoin by terrorist organisations is still in its early stages and is not a mature method of terrorist financing. The development of cryptocurrency technology is unpredictable, and countries and international organisations need to be vigilant and improve their regulatory systems to prevent various ways of terrorist financing.

Frequently asked questions