Avoid Cryptocurrency: Volatile Market, Uncertain Future

Investing in cryptocurrencies is risky business. It's true that crypto can deliver tremendous profits for some investors, but it's also very possible to lose all your money. Crypto is highly volatile, and its value can fluctuate wildly in the blink of an eye. This volatility is driven purely by speculation, as there are no company fundamentals to fall back on. Adding to the risk is the fact that crypto exchanges are vulnerable to hacks and fraud, and there's little regulatory protection for investors. Many governments are yet to fully regulate the use and trade of cryptocurrencies, and some are even calling for them to be made illegal. On top of all that, crypto is an energy-intensive technology that has been linked to criminal activities. So, while crypto may present great opportunities for those who understand how to manage risk, it's certainly not for the faint of heart.

User risk: No way to reverse or cancel a transaction

One of the biggest risks of investing in cryptocurrency is that transactions are irreversible. Once a transaction is initiated, it becomes irreversible. This is because cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Bitcoin Cash operate on decentralized blockchain technology, which ensures transparency, security, and immutability. When a transaction is added to the blockchain, it is confirmed by network participants or miners, who validate and secure the transaction data. Once confirmed, the transaction is permanently recorded on the blockchain, making any alteration or reversal impossible.

The irreversibility of cryptocurrency transactions poses a significant risk to users. For instance, if a user accidentally sends funds to the wrong wallet address or makes a mistake in the transaction amount, they cannot reverse the transaction to correct the error. This can result in the permanent loss of funds, as there is no way to retrieve the cryptocurrency once it has been sent to the wrong recipient.

Additionally, the irreversible nature of cryptocurrency transactions can also lead to challenges in dispute resolution. In traditional payment systems, such as credit cards, chargebacks are possible, allowing users to dispute a transaction and receive a refund if they are unsatisfied with a purchase. However, with cryptocurrencies, once a transaction is confirmed, it is final and cannot be disputed or reversed, even in cases of fraud or disputes with merchants.

To mitigate the risk of irreversible transactions, it is crucial for users to exercise caution and take preventive measures. This includes verifying the recipient's wallet address, double-checking the amount to be sent, and conducting test transactions with small amounts to familiarize themselves with the process. It is also important for users to educate themselves about the specific cryptocurrency they are using, including understanding the transaction mechanics and associated risks, to make informed decisions.

While there have been developments like the Replace by Fee (RBF) protocol, which allows users to adjust their transaction fee to incentivize miners to include their transaction in a block, it does not truly cancel the initial transaction but rather replaces it with a slightly different one. Therefore, users must remain vigilant and cautious when initiating cryptocurrency transactions to avoid irreversible mistakes.

Regulatory risks: A crackdown could cause a market-wide price drop

Investing in cryptocurrencies is risky. One of the reasons for this is the regulatory risk. Cryptocurrency is decentralised and based on blockchain technology, which offers new investment opportunities. However, regulators may crack down on the entire crypto industry, especially if governments view cryptocurrencies as a threat rather than an innovative technology. This could cause a market-wide price drop.

The lack of regulation in the cryptocurrency market means that investors are exposed to significant risks. For example, transactions on decentralised exchanges may be recorded or processed outside the borders of the US, limiting the US Securities and Exchange Commission's ability to protect investors if something goes wrong. The anonymous nature of transactions also makes cryptocurrencies attractive to tax evaders, and governments are likely to intervene if they perceive cryptocurrencies as a threat to their tax revenues.

The Chinese government outlawed cryptocurrencies in 2017, and Western governments could follow suit. In 1933, US President Franklin D. Roosevelt made it illegal for the US population to hoard gold coin, gold bullion or gold certificates. This shows that governments are willing to intervene in markets if they feel their interests are threatened.

The introduction of regulation could cause a decline in the market capitalisation of prominent cryptocurrencies. Investors value the anonymity that comes with virtual currency investing, and regulation would likely put an end to this anonymity. While this may be positive for cryptocurrencies in the long run, it is unlikely that investors would react positively in the short and medium term.

Regulation could also affect the utility of blockchain technology. Blockchain is a digital, distributed, and decentralised ledger that records transactions without the need for a financial intermediary like a bank. It has the potential to transform the way we transmit funds and record data. However, the introduction of regulation could reduce the appeal of blockchain technology by increasing transaction costs and reducing the speed of transactions.

In summary, the regulatory risks associated with cryptocurrencies are significant. A crackdown by governments or regulators could cause a market-wide price drop. Investors should carefully consider these risks before investing in cryptocurrencies.

Counterparty risks: Theft or loss by a third party could result in the loss of your entire investment

Investing in cryptocurrencies carries a high risk of losing your money. One of the risks is counterparty risk, which is the probability that one of the parties involved in a transaction might default on its contractual obligation. In the context of cryptocurrencies, counterparty risk can manifest in the following ways:

Theft or Hacking

Cryptocurrency exchanges are vulnerable to hacking and other criminal activities. Security breaches have resulted in significant losses for investors who have had their digital currencies stolen. While some exchanges and third-party insurers now offer protection against hacks, the risk remains.

Loss of Private Keys

Some cryptocurrency owners prefer offline "cold storage" options such as hardware wallets. However, this method carries the risk of losing the private key. Without the key, it is impossible to access the cryptocurrency, resulting in a total loss of the investment.

Exchange Risk

Storing cryptocurrency on a centralized exchange means you don't have full control over your assets. The exchange could freeze your assets due to a government request or go bankrupt, leaving you with no recourse to recover your money.

Regulatory Risk

The lack of regulation in the cryptocurrency market also contributes to counterparty risk. Decentralized exchanges may process transactions outside the jurisdiction of regulatory bodies, limiting their ability to protect investors in the event of fraud or default.

Default Risk

Counterparty risk is also known as default risk, which is the chance that companies or individuals will be unable to make the required payments on their debt obligations. In the context of cryptocurrencies, this could mean a company issuing a cryptocurrency defaulting on its obligations, resulting in losses for investors.

In conclusion, counterparty risk is a significant factor to consider when deciding whether to invest in cryptocurrencies. The risk of theft, loss, or default by a third party is ever-present and could result in the total loss of your investment. While some measures can be taken to mitigate these risks, it is essential to understand the potential dangers before investing.

Management risks: Deceptive or unethical management practices

Management risks are one of the many risks associated with investing in cryptocurrencies. Due to the lack of coherent and consistent regulations, there are few protections in place against deceptive or unethical management practices. This means that investors are vulnerable to scams and fraudulent schemes. Many investors have lost large sums of money to management teams that failed to deliver a product or service.

The absence of clear regulatory guidelines also makes it challenging for authorities to supervise and enforce consumer protection measures. The crypto ecosystem falls under different regulatory frameworks in different countries, further complicating coordination and enforcement.

Additionally, the decentralised nature of cryptocurrencies, which are often issued by private entities rather than governments, can make it difficult to establish their legal status and ensure compliance with existing financial regulations.

The lack of regulatory oversight and the anonymous nature of crypto transactions also create opportunities for money laundering and terrorist financing.

Furthermore, the barrier to entry for creating new cryptocurrencies is exceptionally low, requiring only time, money, and a team that understands computer code. This has resulted in a crowded market with over 1,600 different virtual currencies, making it challenging to evaluate and regulate them effectively.

The combination of limited regulations, low barriers to entry, and the anonymous nature of transactions creates an environment where deceptive and unethical management practices can occur, posing significant risks to investors.

Programming risks: Bugs or exploits in automated smart contracts

Smart contracts are specialized programs stored on a blockchain, used to automate the execution of an agreement between different parties. Most smart contracts deal with financial assets.

While smart contracts are meant to guarantee that their execution will correspond exactly to the logic that was originally written in them, bugs and exploits can still occur. Errors in smart contracts, once published, cannot be corrected due to the immutable nature of the blockchain.

• Reentrancy: This occurs when a smart contract calls another smart contract in its code and, when the new call is finished, continues with execution. This action requires the vulnerable contract to submit an external call. Scammers can steal these external calls and make a recursive call back to the contract with the help of a callback function. They can then continuously call the withdraw function, draining the contract funds.
• Integer overflow and underflow: This vulnerability is common to many programming languages, including Solidity. A Solidity smart contract is built using 256 bits as the word size, which equates to 4.3 billion Ether. If the value of an unsigned integer is reduced to zero, it will return to the maximum value. A scammer may exploit this vulnerability to force the smart contract's balance to cycle back to the maximum value, allowing them to withdraw funds until the contract is drained.
• Simple logic errors: These may include typographical errors, misinterpretation of specifications, and more serious programming errors that decrease the security of smart contracts.
• Block gas limit vulnerability: The block gas limit helps ensure that blocks do not grow too large. If a transaction consumes too much gas, it will not be executed. However, if data is stored in arrays and accessed through loops, the transaction may run out of gas and get a refund. This can lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) attack.
• Default visibility: The default visibility state for functions is public. This can be problematic when smart contract developers do not specify the visibility of functions that should be private or only callable within the contract itself.
• Timestamp dependence: If a smart contract uses the block.timestamp function to display StartTime and EndTime, a malicious miner can manipulate the timestamp for a few seconds and change the output in their favor.
• Vulnerable price feed: Smart contracts that interact with vulnerable oracles or compromised price feeds can lead to detrimental outcomes. For example, a manipulated price feed can cause a loan platform to either over-collateralize or under-collateralize loans, leading to unfair liquidations or insolvencies.
• Incorrect deploy and post-deploy settings: Incorrect settings in smart contracts, such as configurations or settings that are set during or post-deployment, can lead to hacks. For example, in the Yearn Finance hack, attackers exploited an incorrect setting in its v1 DAI vault, allowing them to withdraw more DAI than intended.
• Inflation attacks: These attacks exploit flaws in the monetary policy of a token or contract, leading to unintended minting or burning of tokens, thereby manipulating their value and supply.
• Stolen private keys: In recent attacks, hackers have targeted the human element, trying to get their hands on private keys that belong to owners or administrators of decentralized protocols. Once compromised, these keys can give an attacker complete control over a smart contract and its associated assets.
• Attack with fake contract: Smart contracts often use the isContract call to check if the method caller is another contract, restricting interactions between smart contracts to reduce vulnerabilities. However, this protection can be bypassed if a contract calls the method during its construction phase, allowing malicious actors to execute unintended actions.
• Incorrect calculations and accuracy loss: Smart contracts require developers to work exclusively with integers, which can lead to challenges and errors in mathematical computations like division.
• Race condition: This vulnerability arises from the order in which transactions are processed by the network, making them susceptible to a range of attacks such as frontrunning and sandwich attacks.
• Incorrect work with ERC-20 tokens: Deviations from the ERC-20 token standard, such as USDT, can lead to interoperability issues when integrating with other platforms or dApps. This includes discrepancies in transfer() and approve() functions, decimal discrepancies, and more.

To safeguard against these risks and vulnerabilities, it is crucial to conduct thorough security audits, implement bug bounty programs, and follow secure coding practices.

Frequently asked questions