Imf's African Loan Recommendations: Should We Proceed?

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) provides financial support to countries facing economic crises, and African countries have been among its most frequent borrowers. Between 1952 and 2023, the IMF extended around 608 loan commitments to African countries, accounting for about 40% of its total loan commitments during this period. African countries' borrowing from the IMF has often coincided with turbulent periods in the global economy, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and supply chain disruptions. While the IMF's lending programs aim to provide breathing room for policy adjustments and promote economic stability, there are concerns about the conditions attached to these loans and the long-term impact on African nations.

African countries' reliance on IMF loans

The average IMF loan to an African country is approximately USD 200 million, much lower than the global average of USD 887 million. The total borrowing of the typical African country from the IMF is about USD 1.5 billion, compared to the average for all countries of USD 8 billion. African countries' reliance on IMF loans is influenced by their desire to borrow at the lowest possible cost. Of the multiple IMF instruments, three account for over 50% of loans taken by African countries: the Extended Credit Facility (ECF), Extended Fund Facility (EFF), and Stand-By Arrangement (SBA). Only the ECF has zero interest, and it must be repaid within 5.5 to 10 years. As of March 2024, 31 African countries had outstanding IMF loans, and from 2023 to 2027, they are projected to repay USD 48 billion.

African countries' borrowing from the IMF is procyclical, coinciding with turbulence in the global economy. For example, the highest number of loan commitments by Africa occurred in 2020 (54) due to the COVID-19 pandemic and in 2023 (27) due to global supply chain disruptions. African countries tend to seek less support from the IMF during periods of relative stability. Additionally, borrowing from the IMF comes with significant costs, and African countries often lack Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), which provide unconditional access to stabilization finance. The IMF's quota formula for determining SDRs is considered outdated.

The IMF's role in Africa is not without criticism. Some argue that the IMF's structural adjustment programs, which provide financing to low-income developing countries, have contributed to the region's high indebtedness. The escalation of public debt in Sub-Saharan African (SSA) nations has sparked global discussions about sustainability and the evolving relationship between China and SSA countries. China has become a significant alternative source of financing for African countries, offering loans exceeding USD 150 billion and focusing on sectors such as transport, power, and mining. However, African countries continue to turn to the IMF during economic crises, indicating a complex relationship with the institution.

IMF loan fees and surcharges

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) provides financial support to countries facing crises, helping them to implement policies that restore economic stability and growth. The IMF offers various types of loans that are tailored to countries' different needs and circumstances. While the IMF does not lend for specific projects, its lending is continuously refined to meet countries' changing needs.

IMF loans are subject to various charges, surcharges, and fees, which are designed to cover the IMF's operational costs and support its activities, including providing policy advice and capacity development to member countries. These charges are also an essential part of the IMF's cooperative lending and risk management framework, helping to cover lending intermediation expenses, build reserves to protect against financial risks, and provide incentives for prudent borrowing.

Basic charges are based on the market-determined Special Drawing Rights (SDR) interest rate, which has a minimum floor of 5 basis points, plus a margin set by the IMF Executive Board every two years (currently at 60 basis points).

Surcharges are applied to high and prolonged borrowing of non-concessional resources. There are two types of surcharges: level-based and time-based. Level-based surcharges are applied when the portion of GRA credit outstanding is greater than 300% of the quota. Time-based surcharges, on the other hand, are applied when the credit exceeds the level-based threshold for more than 36 months (or 51 months in the case of borrowings under the Extended Fund Facility).

Commitment fees are another component of IMF loan charges. These fees are levied on the undisbursed portion of a loan and are typically a small percentage of the loan amount. Commitment fees help manage liquidity risks, compensate the IMF for the cost of establishing and monitoring arrangements, and set aside resources for potential disbursements. They are refunded to the borrowing member in proportion to the amounts borrowed, and if a country borrows the entire amount, the fee is fully refunded.

While the IMF's charges, surcharges, and fees are designed to support its operations and lending framework, there has been criticism that these extra fees hurt nations in desperate need of financial support. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, there were calls to eliminate these fees as they were seen as siphoning away scarce funds that could be used to battle the pandemic and address rising inequality and debt.

IMF loan purposes

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) provides financial support to countries facing economic crises, including those in Africa. The IMF does not lend for specific projects but instead offers breathing room for countries to implement policies that restore economic stability and growth. The fund pursues this mission through surveillance, technical assistance, and lending.

IMF loans are provided in return for implementing specific conditions designed to put government finances on a sustainable footing and restore growth. These conditions are negotiated and may include austerity measures such as cutting expenditures or raising revenues, removing state subsidies, privatizing state enterprises, liberalizing trade and currency policy, and removing barriers to foreign investment and capital flows. The IMF also requires collateral from countries for loans and demands that governments correct their macroeconomic imbalances through policy reform. If the conditions are not met, the funds are withheld.

IMF lending is tailored to countries' different needs and circumstances. Loans to low-income countries carry a zero-interest rate, while non-concessional loans with interest rates are provided through various instruments such as the Stand-By Arrangements (SBA) and the Extended Fund Facility (EFF). The IMF also provides emergency assistance through the Rapid Financing Instrument (RFI) to members facing urgent balance-of-payments needs.

The IMF charges basic fees based on the market-determined Special Drawing Rights (SDR) interest rate, plus a margin set by the IMF Executive Board every two years. There are also surcharges for high and prolonged borrowing, commitment fees on the undisbursed portion of a loan, and service charges on each amount drawn from the GRA. These charges cover the IMF's operational costs and support activities such as providing policy advice and capacity development to member countries.

African countries have been major borrowers from the IMF, particularly during periods of global economic turbulence. However, they have only accessed a small share of IMF resources, with the typical African country borrowing less than 10% of the IMF's total commitments over the period 1952-2023. The average IMF loan to an African country is approximately USD 200 million, compared to a global average of USD 887 million.

IMF loan impact on social spending

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) provides financial support to countries facing crises, offering them "breathing room" to implement policies that restore economic stability and growth. While the IMF claims that poverty reduction is one of its objectives, some studies show that IMF borrower countries experience higher rates of poverty.

The impact of IMF loans on social spending in African countries is complex and multifaceted. On the one hand, IMF loans can protect and even increase social spending, especially in the health sector and in low-income countries. This was particularly evident during the COVID-19 pandemic when the IMF approved loans to support countries facing economic turbulence.

On the other hand, some argue that the IMF's austerity loan conditions can undermine social spending and harm economic, social, and cultural rights. A report by Human Rights Watch, "Bandage on a Bullet Wound: IMF Social Spending Floors and the Covid-19 Pandemic," analyzed loans approved from March 2020 to March 2023 to 38 countries. The report found that the majority of these loans were conditioned on austerity policies, which reduced government spending and increased regressive taxes, potentially harming the rights of citizens.

The impact of IMF loans on social spending in African countries may also be influenced by the specific conditions and requirements attached to the loans. For example, structural reforms imposed by the IMF have been associated with increased poverty rates due to higher unemployment, reduced government revenue, and increased costs of basic services. Additionally, public sector reforms have been found to significantly reduce government spending on public sector wages.

Overall, while IMF loans can provide much-needed financial support to African countries, the impact on social spending is complex and depends on various factors, including the specific conditions of the loans and the economic context in which they are implemented.

IMF loan alternatives

African countries have a good track record of repaying their IMF loans. However, they have only been able to access a small share of IMF resources, with a low average loan amount of approximately USD 200 million. African countries are also faced with significant costs when borrowing from the IMF.

The IMF offers various types of loans tailored to countries' different needs and circumstances. Low-income countries can borrow with no interest rates through the Extended Credit Facility (ECF). However, this type of loan still has to be fully paid back within 5.5 to 10 years. Other IMF loan types include the Standby Credit Facility (SCF), the Rapid Credit Facility (RCF), the Stand-By Arrangement (SBA), the Flexible Credit Line (FCL), the Precautionary and Liquidity Line (PLL), and the Extended Fund Facility.

The IMF also provides alternate sources of financing such as the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility. The IMF's funds come from three sources: member quotas, multilateral and bilateral borrowing agreements. Member quotas are the primary source of IMF funding, with each member country's quota reflecting its size and position in the world economy.

As an alternative to IMF loans, African countries could seek funding from other international financial institutions or lenders. They could also explore options for debt relief or restructuring, or focus on domestic measures to improve their economic stability and growth, such as increasing social spending or strengthening their financial systems.

Frequently asked questions