Contrarian Macro Fund: An Alternative Investment Strategy

Investing against the grain can be a profitable strategy, but it takes discipline and patience. Contrarian investing is all about zigging when others zag and buying assets that are out of favour in the hope that they will rebound. It's a strategy that has been used by some of the world's most successful investors, including Warren Buffett.

One example of a contrarian investment strategy is to focus on out-of-favour sectors or markets. For instance, in 2024, emerging markets were underperforming relative to US stocks, and some investors saw this as a buying opportunity.

Another approach is to look for undervalued companies or sectors. For example, in 2024, the healthcare sector was struggling, and some investors might have seen this as an opportunity to buy healthcare stocks at a discount.

Contrarian investing can also involve shorting stocks or markets that you believe are overvalued. For example, a contrarian investor might have shorted the housing market before the 2008 financial crisis, betting that it would collapse.

However, contrarian investing can be risky. Out-of-favour areas of the market may be unpopular for a reason, and there is no guarantee that they will rebound. It's important for investors to do their research and carefully consider the risks before making any investment decisions.

Contrarian Macro Fund's approach to trading

Contrarian Macro Funds Approach to Trading

Contrarian investing is a strategy that goes against prevailing market trends. It involves buying when others are selling and selling when others are buying. This approach is based on the belief that markets are subject to herding behaviour influenced by fear and greed, which leads to periodic over and underpricing.

The key to contrarian investing is to identify undervalued investment opportunities. This requires spending a significant amount of time researching stocks and industries to find distressed companies with share prices below their intrinsic value. Contrarian investors target these stocks, buying them at low prices and then selling once the share price has recovered and other investors begin targeting the company.

This strategy requires discipline, patience, confidence, and rationality. It is not an easy approach as it goes against human nature to stand out and go against the crowd. However, it can lead to high returns as demonstrated by some of the world's most successful investors such as Warren Buffett, who famously said, "Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful."

Contrarian investors need to be able to identify overvalued sectors and then move capital away from those sectors towards undervalued sectors where bargains can be found. This involves using quantitative analysis to determine the fair value of a company and its potential for growth.

Contrarian investing can be applied to individual stocks, industries, or entire markets. It is similar to value investing as both strategies focus on finding undervalued securities. However, contrarian investing is more concerned with going against current market sentiment, while value investing focuses on finding stocks with long-term fundamentals that may be overlooked by the market.

Contrarian investors need to be aware of the risks involved. It can be challenging to find undervalued stocks, and there is a possibility of missing out on gains if broad bullish sentiment proves true. Additionally, an undervalued stock may remain undervalued if market sentiment remains bearish.

To mitigate these risks, contrarian investors should follow certain rules such as avoiding short positions, keeping a debt-free portfolio, and diversifying their investments across different sectors, companies, countries, and asset classes.

In summary, the contrarian macro fund's approach to trading involves going against the crowd, identifying undervalued investment opportunities, and taking advantage of market downturns to generate high returns. This strategy requires discipline, a long-term focus, and a thorough understanding of market dynamics.

The role of central bank liquidity

The central banks infused $25 trillion of liquidity into the system in response to the Global Financial Crisis of 2008 and the COVID pandemic. This unprecedented move had unknown impacts and effects, which we are still discovering. The initial collateral effect was massive asset price inflation, and we are now witnessing the negative effects, such as global consumer price inflation.

The central bank's posture toward liquidity remains toward extraction rather than infusion. The world's major central banks' posture toward liquidity in markets is 180 degrees different from the previous decade. The supply that will need to be absorbed is enormous, and it is believed that private investors will demand a much higher premium to absorb this multi-year balance sheet runoff.

The central bank reserves in the Eurozone have also been created in the context of managing financial stress episodes, such as the Global Financial Crisis and the three-year very long-term refinancing operations in 2011 and 2012. The pandemic emergency purchase programme was a hybrid of a market stabilisation programme and a quantitative easing programme.

The liquidity created by central banks since the Global Financial Crisis has helped banks fulfil the liquidity requirements introduced by Basel 3. In the Eurozone, the excess reserves held by banks in the Eurosystem represented 65% of High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) taken into account for the calculation of the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) in December 2023. Sovereign securities only accounted for 30%.

While central banks are progressively reversing course, their balance sheets may need to remain larger than they were before the financial crisis. Several central banks have decided to keep ample reserves and a floor system rather than a corridor system. This choice entails potential trade-offs. On the one hand, an extra buffer of reserves alleviates upward pressure on short-term interest rates in case of liquidity shocks. On the other hand, ample reserves lower the need for active liquidity management, reducing banks' competition for reserves in wholesale funding markets.

Ultimately, the question arises of the optimal composition of High-Quality Liquid Assets, i.e. the balance between reserves at the central bank and high-quality securities. The ECB recently confirmed its broad collateral framework to avoid situations of impaired market functioning and where collateral would become too scarce due to the central bank's market footprint.

The appropriate steady-state level of central bank reserves should be increasing in the size of the banking system, the size of the overall financial system, and the overall size of the economy. The liquidity preference of investors is likely proportional to the scale of overall asset holdings. A durable level of central bank reserves is likely required to ensure the sufficient provision of bank credit to enable the economy to attain its steady-state potential output growth rate.

The importance of price action

Price action is an important indicator of market trends and can provide valuable insights for investors. In the context of contrarian investing, paying attention to price action can help identify unexpected or unusual movements that deviate from expectations. For example, the activity on Friday, October 21st, was described as "very unusual and unexpected" by Neal Berger, the founder of Eagle's View Contrarian Macro Fund, Ltd. This unexpected price action can signal a potential shift in the market and is worth monitoring.

Contrarian investors need to be vigilant and keep an eye out for repeated and persistent price actions that go against the expected trends. By doing so, they can identify potential opportunities or risks that others may overlook. It is important to note that one-off events like the one on October 21st may be anomalies, but they can also be indicators of a larger shift. Therefore, contrarian investors need to strike a balance between being resolute in their overall thesis and being adaptable to unexpected price actions.

Price action can also provide insights into the broader market context. For example, despite the Fed's plans to raise interest rates, the S&P 500 was trading higher than expected. This discrepancy between the expected and actual price action is crucial for contrarian investors to consider when making investment decisions.

Additionally, price action can help identify market rallies or short-covering rallies. For instance, the unexpected price action on Friday, October 21st, was attributed to a self-reinforcing short-covering rally triggered by a slight tipping of the scales in the market. Contrarian investors need to be aware of these rallies and manage their risk exposure accordingly.

In conclusion, price action is a critical factor for contrarian investors to consider. By monitoring and analyzing price actions, investors can identify potential opportunities or risks that go against market trends. It helps them stay adaptable and make informed investment decisions, even in unexpected market situations.

The risks of short-covering

Short-covering refers to buying back borrowed securities to close out an open short position. It requires purchasing the same security that was initially sold short and handing back the shares initially borrowed for the short sale. This transaction is referred to as "buy to cover".

Short-covering can result in either a profit (if bought back lower than the short sale price) or a loss (if bought back higher than the short sale price).

Market Reversals

Short-covering relies on the assumption that the stock price will decline. If market sentiment or conditions change unexpectedly, causing the stock price to rise instead, short- sellers may incur losses when buying back the shares at a higher price.

Losses from Margin Calls

If short-sellers are unable to buy back the shares due to insufficient funds or other reasons, they may face margin calls from their brokers. Margin calls require additional funds to cover losses or increase collateral, potentially leading to financial strain.

Short Squeeze

Short-covering can contribute to a short squeeze, where a sharp increase in demand for a heavily shorted stock forces short- sellers to quickly cover their positions by buying back shares. This sudden surge in buying activity can lead to rapid price increases, exacerbating losses for short- sellers. The potential for a short squeeze is higher when there is a high level of short interest in a stock.

Increased Risk with High Short Interest

Stocks with high short-interest ratios may pose increased risks for short- covering. If a large percentage of outstanding shares are sold short, any positive news or developments regarding the company can trigger a rush to cover positions, driving up prices and causing losses for short- sellers.

Limited Profit Potential

While short-covering can result in profits if shares are bought back at a lower price than initially sold, the profit potential is limited to the difference between the selling and buying prices. If the stock price does not decline as expected or rebounds unexpectedly, short- sellers may not realise significant profits or may even incur losses.

Volatility and Uncertainty

Short-covering can contribute to increased volatility and uncertainty in the market, especially for heavily shorted stocks. Rapid fluctuations in prices and trading volumes can make it difficult for investors to accurately predict market movements and manage risks effectively.

Liquidity Concerns

In some cases, short-covering in the stock market may be difficult or costly due to limited liquidity. Illiquid stocks with fewer shareholders may experience wider bid-ask spreads and reduced trading volumes, making it challenging for short- sellers to execute buy orders at favourable prices.

The future of the Yen

The Japanese Yen is often regarded as a "safe-haven" currency, providing stability when adverse risk events strike markets. However, in 2022, the Yen plunged to a 32-year low against the US dollar, dropping more than 30% from around 115 yen to 152 yen. This was caused by aggressive monetary tightening by the US Federal Reserve, which sent the dollar higher against the Yen, along with rising US treasury yields.

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) has pursued an ultra-loose monetary policy, maintaining artificially low interest rates, which has contributed to the Yen's decline. The BOJ owns more than 50% of all Japanese government bonds (JGBs) outstanding and has been intervening in the market to buy Yen to try to stem the decline. However, these interventions have had little effect, and the Yen remains in a downward spiral.

The BOJ is now facing a conundrum. Japan is reluctant to raise interest rates as this would increase the cost of servicing its enormous debt, which stood at 260% of annual economic output in 2021. At the same time, the ultra-loose monetary policy is causing inflationary pressures in Japan, particularly on imported essentials such as food and energy. Producer prices in Japan are increasing at a rapid pace, growing at a 9.7% year-on-year rate as of September 2022.

Market analysts predict that the Yen will gain ground in the coming years, narrowing the gap between Japanese and US long-term bond yields. The Yen is expected to rise towards 120 yen against the dollar, a sharp turnaround from its current levels of around 133 yen. This strengthening of the Yen will impact the earnings of major Japanese exporters and could pull the benchmark Nikkei 225 index down.

In conclusion, the future of the Yen hangs in the balance. The BOJ's monetary policy decisions will be crucial, and any changes will have a significant impact on the global macroeconomic landscape and the relative attractiveness of other countries' currencies.

Frequently asked questions