Risk Parity Portfolio: A Guide To Investing

Risk parity is an investment management approach that focuses on allocating risk rather than capital. The goal of risk parity investing is to earn the optimal level of return at the targeted risk level. This is achieved by allocating investment capital based on a risk-weighted basis to optimally diversify investments. Risk parity portfolios weight asset classes by volatility and use leverage to boost returns while maintaining volatility.

The risk parity approach was popularised by Ray Dalio's Bridgewater Associates, with the launch of their All Weather fund in 1996. The fund's intention is to 'weather' all economic environments reasonably well. While the fund has suffered losses in recent years, it has also outperformed the market during the 2007-2008 financial crisis and in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis.

Risk parity portfolios are often seen as complex and requiring active management, however, they can also be considered a passive management strategy. The extent of management required is often the distinguishing factor between the various kinds of risk parity funds available.

Risk parity portfolios weight asset classes by volatility

Risk parity is a portfolio allocation strategy that uses risk to determine allocations across various components of an investment portfolio. Risk parity portfolios weight asset classes by volatility, using modest leverage to boost returns while keeping volatility manageable. The main aim is to find weights of assets that ensure an equal level of risk, most frequently measured by volatility.

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction seeks to allocate investment capital on a risk-weighted basis to optimally diversify investments. It attempts to avoid the risks and skews of traditional portfolio diversification. It allows for the construction of an optimal portfolio considering the volatility of the assets included in the portfolio.

The risk parity approach builds off of modern portfolio theory (MPT) but allows for the use of leverage and short selling. Risk parity requires a great deal of quantitative calculation, which makes its allocations more advanced than simplified allocation strategies.

The idea behind risk parity is simple: build a portfolio of uncorrelated assets, weighted according to their volatilities, and use modest leverage to boost returns while keeping volatility tolerable. Risk parity uses the concept of the security market line (SML) as part of its approach, which follows from MPT combined with the capital asset pricing model (CAPM). The SML is a graphical representation of the relationship between the risk and return of an asset. The greater the possibility for the return of an asset, the higher the risk associated with that asset.

Risk parity portfolios use leverage to boost returns

Risk parity is a portfolio allocation strategy that uses risk to determine the distribution of capital across an investment portfolio. It is an advanced technique that modifies the modern portfolio theory (MPT) approach by allowing for the use of leverage and short selling.

Leverage is a crucial aspect of risk parity portfolios, as it enables investors to borrow or sell short to achieve the best risk-reward trade-off. By using leverage, investors can boost returns while keeping volatility manageable. This is particularly useful for portfolios with a traditional 60/40 allocation, where investors must take on greater risk to achieve acceptable returns.

For example, consider a portfolio with a 100% allocation to equities, resulting in a 15% risk. By employing moderate leverage of around 2.1 times the amount of capital, an investor can achieve a portfolio with 35% allocated to equities and 65% to bonds. This leveraged portfolio has the same expected return as the unleveraged portfolio but with an annualised risk of only 12.7%, representing a 15% reduction in risk.

The use of leverage in risk parity portfolios requires regular rebalancing to maintain the desired volatility exposure for each asset class. Additionally, it is important to note that leverage increases the overall risk of the portfolio, including the risk of counterparty default.

Risk parity is a form of active or passive management

Risk parity is a portfolio allocation strategy that uses risk to determine allocations across various components of an investment portfolio. It is an approach to investment management that focuses on the allocation of risk, usually defined as volatility, rather than the allocation of capital. Risk parity can be considered either a passive or active management strategy.

On the one hand, risk parity can be seen as a passive approach because it does not require the portfolio manager to buy or sell securities based on predictions about future market behaviour. The portfolio manager's role is to ensure that the dollar exposure remains constant, even if the price of a security fluctuates. Additionally, the risk parity approach seeks to avoid the risks and skews of traditional portfolio diversification, which is a passive strategy.

On the other hand, risk parity can also be viewed as an active management strategy. It requires a complex quantitative methodology and a great deal of quantitative calculation, making it more advanced than simplified allocation strategies. The use of leverage in a risk parity approach necessitates regular rebalancing of assets to maintain consistent volatility exposure for each asset class. This active management is particularly important when derivatives are used in risk parity strategies. Furthermore, the extent to which a risk parity portfolio is managed often distinguishes the different kinds of risk parity funds available.

The principles of risk parity may be applied differently by different financial managers, as they have varying methods for categorising assets, defining risk, allocating risk within asset classes, forecasting future risk, and implementing exposure to risk.

Risk parity is vulnerable to shifts in correlation regimes

During periods of significant shifts in correlation regimes, such as the one observed in Q1 2020, risk-parity funds may underperform. An example of this was the underperformance of risk-parity funds during the Covid-19 sell-off. The performance of risk parity portfolios relies on the assumption that asset classes have low or negative correlations. When correlations between asset classes increase, the diversification benefits of risk parity portfolios are reduced.

For instance, in 2008, the correlation coefficient between stocks and commodities increased, and both asset classes performed negatively. Similarly, in 2001, the correlation between stocks and bonds rose to nearly 64%. In such scenarios, the risk parity portfolio loses its diversification benefits, and the risk of tail events increases.

To address this vulnerability, risk parity portfolios can be constructed using clusters of different asset classes, with each cluster contributing equally to the overall portfolio risk. This helps to reduce the impact of shifts in correlation regimes within individual asset classes. Additionally, investors should pay close attention to the correlation coefficients of the asset classes or clusters they are investing in.

Risk parity requires strong management and oversight

Risk parity is a portfolio allocation strategy that uses risk to determine allocations across various components of an investment portfolio. It is an advanced portfolio technique often used by hedge funds and sophisticated investors. The risk parity approach to portfolio construction seeks to allocate investment capital on a risk-weighted basis to optimally diversify investments, viewing the risk and return of the entire portfolio as one.

The extent of management and oversight involved in risk parity can vary depending on the specific implementation. Some scholars consider risk parity to be a passive approach, arguing that it does not require the portfolio manager to buy or sell securities based on predictions about future market behaviour. However, others assert that risk parity requires active management and continuous oversight to reduce the potential for negative consequences resulting from leverage and allocation building. The distinguishing characteristic between the various types of risk parity funds available today often lies in the degree to which the portfolio is actively managed.

The principles of risk parity may be applied differently by different financial managers, as they have different methods for categorising assets, defining risk, allocating risk within asset classes, forecasting future risk, and implementing exposure to risk. The success of a risk parity strategy, therefore, relies on strong management and oversight to ensure that these principles are applied effectively and that the portfolio is adjusted as needed to maintain its risk-weighted balance.

Frequently asked questions