Valuing Investment Management Firms: Strategies For Success

Valuing an investment management firm is a complex process that involves various factors and methodologies. The value of such a firm is contextual and depends on the specific transactional purpose of the valuation, the state of the industry, and the firm's performance and assets. Investment management firms handle their clients' financial assets and investments, which include developing investment strategies, creating tax strategies, managing asset allocation, and providing financial planning services. These firms are typically compensated through management fees, which are usually a percentage of the value of the client's portfolio. When determining the value of an investment management firm, it is essential to consider the revenue generated, the number of assets under management, and the performance of the firm relative to the market.

Understanding the transactional purpose of a valuation

Valuing an investment management firm is a complex process that involves various factors and contexts. The transactional purpose of a valuation is a critical aspect that provides a framework for understanding the expected returns of an investment in a wealth management firm. Here are some key considerations to understand the transactional purpose of valuation:

Contextual Valuation:

The value of an investment management firm is relative and context-dependent. The transactional purpose of a valuation is one such context. It involves understanding the specific objectives and intentions behind the valuation exercise. For example, the valuation might be conducted for a potential merger or acquisition, tax purposes, or strategic planning.

Analytical Framework:

Valuing an investment management firm requires analysing multiple aspects of the business. This includes evaluating the firm's management, capital structure, future earnings potential, and the market value of its assets. By considering these factors, analysts can make informed assessments about the firm's current or projected worth.

Valuation Techniques:

There are several techniques available for conducting a valuation, such as fundamental analysis, the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), or the dividend discount model (DDM). Each technique provides a different perspective on the firm's value, and the choice of technique depends on the specific context and objectives of the valuation.

Intrinsic vs. Market Value:

The transactional purpose of a valuation is often linked to understanding the intrinsic value of the firm, which refers to its perceived worth based on future earnings or other attributes. By comparing the intrinsic value to the market price, analysts can determine if the firm is overvalued or undervalued, thus informing investment decisions.

Comparable Companies:

When valuing an investment management firm, it is common to use relative valuation models that involve comparing the firm to similar companies in the same industry. This approach helps establish a valuation range and provides a benchmark for assessing the firm's performance and potential.

Future Earnings Prospects:

The transactional purpose of a valuation is often tied to understanding the future earnings potential of the investment management firm. Analysts will consider factors such as projected cash flows, discount rates, and growth rates to estimate the firm's ability to generate returns for investors.

In conclusion, understanding the transactional purpose of valuing an investment management firm is crucial for making informed decisions about investments, mergers, acquisitions, or strategic planning. By considering the contextual factors, analytical frameworks, and various valuation techniques, stakeholders can gain insights into the expected returns and potential value of the firm.

Discounted cash flow analysis

Discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis is a method used to value an investment by discounting its estimated future cash flows. It is based on the principle that the value of an investment is equal to the present value of its expected future cash flows. This involves forecasting future cash flows and applying a discount rate to determine the present value of those cash flows. The discount rate reflects the time value of money, which assumes that money received in the future is worth less than money received today due to factors such as uncertainty, inflation, and the potential to invest and earn interest.

DCF analysis can be applied to value a company, stock, project, or other assets and is widely used in the investment industry and corporate finance management. It is particularly useful for valuing companies with free cash flow (FCF) and when FCF can be reasonably estimated. FCF measures the cash available to a company after repaying creditors and paying dividends and interest to investors.

To perform a DCF analysis, the following steps are typically involved:

• Forecast future cash flows: Estimate the future cash flows for a specific period, typically using financial statements and historical data.
• Determine the discount rate: Choose an appropriate discount rate that reflects the riskiness of the investment and the time value of money. This is often the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), which takes into account the cost of debt and equity.
• Calculate terminal value: Determine the value of the investment at the end of the forecast period, assuming perpetual growth or using other valuation methods.
• Discount cash flows and terminal value: Apply the discount rate to the projected cash flows and terminal value to calculate their present value.
• Sum discounted cash flows: Add up the discounted cash flows and terminal value to determine the net present value (NPV) of the investment.
• Compare with initial investment: Compare the NPV with the current cost of the investment to assess its profitability. If the NPV is higher than the present cost, the investment is likely to be profitable.

DCF analysis provides a forward-looking valuation that relies on the fundamental expectations of the business rather than historical results or public market factors. It allows for the consideration of different operating strategies and the separate valuation of different components or synergies within a business. However, it is sensitive to the accuracy of estimates for cash flows, terminal value, and discount rate, and may not be suitable for innovative projects or growth companies where future cash flows are challenging to predict.

Market capitalisation

Market cap is often used as a baseline for analysis and a base for other financial metrics. It is a good insight into the size of a company and can be used as a tool to compare companies. For example, a company with 20 million shares selling at $100 a share has a market cap of $2 billion. Another company with a share price of $1,000 but only 10,000 shares outstanding has a market cap of $10 million.

Market cap can also be used to categorise stocks based on their absolute size, such as large-cap vs small-cap stocks. Large-cap companies have a market cap of $10 billion or more, mid-cap companies have a market cap between $2 billion and $10 billion, and small-cap companies have a market cap between $250 million and $2 billion. There are also micro-cap and mega-cap categories.

Market cap is a good indicator of a company's financial scope and can help investors understand the level of risk and potential return on investment. Large-cap companies tend to be more established and stable, with slower growth and less volatile share prices. Small-cap companies, on the other hand, are often younger companies with higher growth potential but also come with higher risk.

It is important to note that market cap does not affect stock price; rather, stock price is used to calculate market cap. Additionally, market cap does not determine the amount it would cost to acquire a company in a merger or acquisition; instead, enterprise value is a better measure for this.

The role of the appraiser

Appraisers use various methods and metrics to value a firm. One common approach is to calculate the firm's book value using its balance sheet. This involves subtracting the company's liabilities from its assets, excluding intangible assets. However, this method has limitations and may not provide a complete picture of the firm's value.

Another widely accepted method is the discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, which estimates the value of a company based on its expected future cash flows. DCF analysis calculates the present value of future cash flows by considering the discount rate and time period of analysis. This method reflects a company's ability to generate liquid assets but relies on assumptions about future growth and discount rates.

Other valuation techniques include market capitalization, enterprise value, earnings, and the present value of a growing perpetuity formula. These methods consider factors such as share price, total shares, debt, equity, and growth rates to determine a company's worth.

When valuing an investment management firm, appraisers must also consider the context, including the transactional purpose of the valuation, the state of the industry, and the specific firm being valued.

Overall, the role of the appraiser is crucial in providing an estimate of the investment management firm's value, helping stakeholders make informed decisions and ensuring a fair assessment of the firm's worth.

The impact of market behaviour on revenues

The revenues of investment management firms are directly linked to the behaviour of the market. This means that the profits of the company are dependent on market valuations. A significant decline in asset prices can cause a reduction in the firm's revenue, especially if the price reduction is large in comparison to the ongoing and steady company costs of operation.

Clients may also be impatient during hard times and bear markets, and even above-average fund performance may not be able to sustain a client's portfolio. This is because the revenues of investment management firms are directly linked to the market's behaviour. The direct connection between the two means that a company's profits are dependent on market valuations.

Since the mid-2000s, the industry has also faced challenges from two other sources: the growth of robo-advisors and the availability of exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Robo-advisors are digital platforms that provide automated, algorithm-driven investment strategies and asset allocation. ETFs, on the other hand, mirror the portfolio of a benchmark index, and few investment decisions have to be made by human fund managers. As a result, both can charge far lower fees than human fund managers.

However, according to some surveys, these lower-cost alternatives will often outperform actively managed funds—either outright or in terms of overall return—primarily due to them not having heavy fees dragging them down. This pressure from dual competition is why investment management firms must hire talented, intelligent professionals.

Frequently asked questions