Bitcoin Halal Or Haram? Islamic Finance Experts Weigh In

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have sparked a debate among Islamic scholars about whether they are halal (permissible) or haram (forbidden). With no official guidance, scholars are divided, and the task of interpreting religious precepts falls on legislators. The speculative nature of cryptocurrencies and their status as objects of speculation sits uneasily with Islam, which emphasises real economic activity and frowns upon monetary speculation. However, some scholars argue that cryptocurrencies are permissible because they are not backed by interest and are already used as a medium of exchange.

Bitcoin is a high-risk, high-reward investment

The high-risk nature of Bitcoin is further exacerbated by regulatory uncertainties. Cryptocurrencies operate in a regulatory grey area, and changes in government regulations can significantly impact their value and legality. Additionally, there are risks associated with scams and fraudulent schemes in the cryptocurrency market, such as Ponzi schemes and fake cryptocurrencies.

However, despite the risks, Bitcoin offers the potential for substantial gains, making it a high-reward investment. The cryptocurrency market has seen significant growth over the past decade, resulting in exponential returns for early investors. Technological innovations, such as smart contracts, and the increasing acceptance of Bitcoin as a form of payment by various businesses also contribute to its high-reward potential.

It is important to note that investing in Bitcoin may not be suitable for everyone. It is typically more appropriate for investors who can afford to potentially lose their investment and are comfortable with a high level of risk. Before investing, it is crucial to conduct thorough research and due diligence, stay informed about market trends and developments, and carefully consider your risk tolerance and investment goals.

Scholars are divided on whether Bitcoin is halal or haram

On the other hand, scholars like Mufti Faraz Adam, Mufti Muhammad Abu-Bakar, and Ziyaad Mahomed, the Shariah Committee Chairman of HSBC Amanah Malaysia Bhd, argue that Bitcoin is halal. They contend that all currencies have a speculative element, and Bitcoin's speculative nature does not inherently make it haram. They also highlight the social acceptance of Bitcoin as a valuable medium of exchange in day-to-day transactions. Furthermore, they acknowledge the nascent nature of the industry and the potential for a directly gold-backed cryptocurrency, which could be seen as halal.

The interpretations of these Islamic scholars highlight the complexity of applying Islamic Canonical Law to a modern, digital financial system like Bitcoin. The lack of clear official guidelines and the rapidly evolving nature of the crypto industry further contribute to the ongoing debate among scholars.

Bitcoin is not backed by a central authority

Bitcoin is a decentralized peer-to-peer system, meaning it has the potential to upend the existing financial system and undermine the role of governments and central banks in it. Without a central authority, there is no trusted entity to back up the currency, enforce its value, or regulate its use. This can lead to instability and price fluctuations, as well as difficulties in storing and securing Bitcoin due to its complex nature.

The absence of a central authority also means that Bitcoin cannot be effectively regulated or controlled by governments. This can be problematic as Bitcoin can be used to circumvent capital controls and facilitate illicit activities. Criminals can use Bitcoin to evade detection and camouflage their involvement in illegal transactions, taking advantage of the pseudonymous nature of its network.

However, it is important to note that some scholars argue that a lack of central authority is not a barrier to a currency being permissible under Islamic law. For example, Ziyaad Mahomed, Shariah Committee Chairman of HSBC Amanah Malaysia Bhd, argues that Sharia only requires social acceptance of a currency's value and its capability to be used in transactions.

While Bitcoin's decentralized nature and lack of central authority have been touted as benefits by its proponents, it is also a key reason why some scholars and authorities view it with skepticism and concern.

Bitcoin is used for illegal activities

Bitcoin is often used for illegal activities due to its pseudonymous nature, which makes it difficult to trace transactions back to their source. This has made it a popular medium of exchange on the dark web, where users can buy and sell illegal goods and services such as drugs, weapons, explosives, and child pornography. It is also used for money laundering, terrorist financing, and other criminal activities.

Anonymity

Bitcoin transactions are recorded on a public blockchain, but the identities of those making transactions are kept anonymous. While it is possible to track transactions from one crypto address to another, the real-world identity of the person behind the address remains unknown. This makes it difficult for law enforcement agencies to identify and track down criminals using Bitcoin for illegal activities.

No Third-Party Involvement

Bitcoin transactions are made directly between peers, with no third-party involvement or mediation. This makes it easier for criminals to make one-off sales of illegal goods or services, such as drugs or child pornography, without having to go through a regulated financial institution.

Speed and Accessibility

Trading with Bitcoin is easy and accessible to anyone with an internet connection. It only requires a wallet application, which can be quickly and easily downloaded to a device, or a cloud service. Transactions can be made anywhere in the world within minutes, and there is no need to validate them with a central authority. This makes it a fast and efficient way to move money around, especially for international transfers.

Easy Storage and Transfer

As digital assets, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are easy to store and do not take up any physical space. This makes them less likely to attract the attention of thieves or authorities. They are also easy to transfer, both locally and internationally, with little risk of being seized. This makes them ideal for criminals looking to steal and launder funds.

Borderless Transfers

Bitcoin transactions can be made quickly and easily from one crypto address to another, regardless of whether they serve the same person or different parties, locals or foreigners, acquaintances, or strangers. This enables international trading, which, in a criminal setting, translates to trafficking.

Challenges for Law Enforcement

The very benefits of Bitcoin that make it attractive to criminals also pose significant challenges for law enforcement agencies. The lack of a link between a crypto address and the person behind it, as well as the ability to transfer funds globally, easily, and quickly, make it difficult to detect and investigate illicit transactions.

Illicit Activity Statistics

According to a report by Chainalysis, a blockchain data platform, illicit activities like cybercrime, money laundering, and terrorist financing made up only 0.15% of all crypto transactions conducted in 2021. However, the absolute number of crypto crimes is at an all-time high, and the rise of decentralized finance has contributed to the growth of legitimate activity.

Another study, published in the Review of Financial Studies, found that approximately one-quarter of Bitcoin users are involved in illegal activity, with an estimated $76 billion of illegal activity per year involving Bitcoin. This is close to the scale of the US and European markets for illegal drugs. The study also found that the use of Bitcoin in illegal trade varies over time and tends to decline with increasing mainstream interest and the emergence of more opaque cryptocurrencies.

While Bitcoin has legitimate uses and can be a valuable investment for many people, it is also used for a significant amount of illegal activity. This has raised concerns among law enforcement agencies and regulators, who are facing challenges in detecting and investigating illicit transactions made using Bitcoin.

Bitcoin is not a recognised currency

Bitcoin is rewarded to blockchain miners who verify transactions and can be purchased on several exchanges. It is a peer-to-peer payment method, and its use has expanded since its introduction in 2009. It can be used by speculators, investors, and consumers for purchases or value exchange.

However, it is not considered a currency by governments, who have instead designated it as a commodity. This has made it impractical to use as a currency, as it is taxable.

Bitcoin also does not fulfil the traditional definition of money, which is considered to be something low-risk and low-return. Bitcoin is high-risk and high-return, making it a good store of value and medium of exchange, but not a currency.

Additionally, Bitcoin's user experience is not applicable to a currency. It is difficult to use and understand, and transactions are slow and expensive.

While Bitcoin has grown in popularity, it is unlikely to become a mainstream currency due to its lack of recognition as money, its scalability issues, and its user experience.

Frequently asked questions