Bitcoin Investment: Safe Or Risky Bet?

Bitcoin is a risky investment. Its value is extremely volatile, and it has no inherent value. It's also susceptible to market manipulation, and investors do not benefit from the same regulatory protections as registered securities. Additionally, there is a constant threat of cyberattacks and scams. However, Bitcoin has been one of the best investments in the world since its creation in 2009, and it remains the most popular and valuable cryptocurrency.

Bitcoin's extreme volatility

Bitcoin's value can be extremely volatile. In 2022, the price of Bitcoin dropped from almost $48,000 to lows of around $16,000. In 2021, it skyrocketed to as high as $68,789 before pulling back to around $19,000 in September.

Bitcoin's price volatility is due to a number of factors. Firstly, it has no inherent value. It was essentially created out of thin air and isn't backed by earnings or profits. Its value is derived solely from investor demand, which can be influenced by anything from speculation and hype to the belief that crypto will become legitimised.

Secondly, Bitcoin is highly susceptible to market manipulation. As a decentralised currency, it is more vulnerable to manipulation than traditional securities. It also does not have circuit breakers, which automatically pause trading when prices fluctuate too drastically.

Thirdly, Bitcoin is still a relatively new asset class, and it doesn't have the long-term track record of stocks and bonds. This makes it difficult for investors to determine its true value, and its price is therefore highly sensitive to investor sentiment.

Finally, Bitcoin is subject to hype, speculation and promotion. Entire message boards are devoted to hyping up Bitcoin, and it can be hard to distinguish between genuine news items and the work of speculators trying to manipulate the stock higher.

All these factors contribute to Bitcoin's extreme volatility, and investors should be aware of the risks before investing.

The risks of cybercrime

Bitcoin's popularity has soared in the past decade, and so has its use in cybercrime. The cryptocurrency's decentralised nature and the anonymity it offers make it an ideal vehicle for cybercriminals to carry out malicious attacks. The lack of legislation around virtual assets also contributes to this issue.

Cybercriminals are often located far away from their victims, so physical currency is not a useful option for them. Traditional banking is also not a viable option as law enforcement can easily follow the money trail. Cryptocurrencies, on the other hand, offer a certain level of anonymity and do not require personal information to make transactions, making it harder for law enforcement to track down the individuals behind the attacks.

Bitcoin, being the first and most well-known cryptocurrency, is the most popular choice among cybercriminals. Its high liquidity and widespread acceptance on the dark web make it ideal for illicit activities. While transactions on the blockchain can be traced, it is still much more difficult compared to traditional forms of currency.

Ransomware attacks are one of the most common ways cybercriminals use Bitcoin. In these attacks, a cybercriminal gains access to a victim's computer, encrypts their files, and demands a ransom in Bitcoin in exchange for the decryption key. Other cryptocurrencies that offer enhanced privacy features, such as Monero and Ethereum, are also popular among cybercriminals.

Another way cybercriminals exploit cryptocurrencies is through scamming and phishing. They may set up Ponzi schemes, promise high returns on investment, and then disappear with the money. They may also trick victims into giving away their personal information or sending money to a fake wallet address.

The rise of cryptocurrencies has also led to the emergence of various forms of malware, such as Trojans that steal wallets and threats that secretly install miners on devices to use their computing power for crypto mining.

To protect themselves from these risks, individuals and businesses should stay vigilant against unsolicited requests for personal information or money and be wary of investment opportunities that seem too good to be true.

Regulatory uncertainty

The lack of regulatory clarity around cryptocurrency also poses challenges for investors. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), for example, has repeatedly rejected potential Bitcoin spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) due to concerns about investor safety. The regulatory environment for crypto is currently uncertain, and increased regulation could make Bitcoin less appealing to some investors.

Additionally, the failure of crypto exchanges, such as the recent collapse of FTX, underscores the risks inherent in the crypto market. Investors who held Bitcoin with FTX or FTX.US when they filed for bankruptcy in 2022 may have lost access to their investments.

The regulatory landscape for Bitcoin is complex and constantly evolving. Investors should carefully consider the potential impact of regulatory changes on their investments and be prepared for a dynamic and uncertain environment.

The environmental impact of Bitcoin mining

Bitcoin mining has a large environmental impact. It requires large amounts of energy, more than is used by some small countries. The process also generates significant electronic waste, with Bitcoin mining producing over 77 kilotons of e-waste annually.

Energy Consumption

The Bitcoin network is estimated to use around 140 Terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity annually, which is about 0.63% of global electricity use. This is more energy than is used by Pakistan and Ukraine, based on 2019 estimates.

The energy-intensive nature of Bitcoin mining is a feature, not a bug. The process of validating transactions is designed to use large amounts of energy, as it depends on the computational power of thousands of computers to maintain security.

Carbon Emissions

The Bitcoin network is estimated to produce around 73 million tons of carbon dioxide per year, equivalent to the emissions of Oman. This is due to the predominant use of fossil fuels, particularly coal, in most countries where Bitcoin is mined.

Electronic Waste

Bitcoin mining also generates significant electronic waste, as the specialised hardware used becomes obsolete roughly every 1.5 years. The Bitcoin network produces approximately 72,500 tons of electronic waste annually.

Alternatives

Some cryptocurrencies use alternative consensus mechanisms that do not require extensive computing power, such as proof-of-stake. These cryptocurrencies have a much lower environmental impact.

The environmental impacts of Bitcoin mining are significant and are likely to persist unless the Bitcoin network switches to another verification protocol.

The lack of inherent value

One of the most significant concerns surrounding Bitcoin is its lack of inherent value. Unlike traditional investments, Bitcoin does not have a physical existence or generate any cash flow, revenue, or profits. Its price is solely determined by investor demand, making it highly volatile and susceptible to rapid price swings. This speculative nature of Bitcoin has led to comparisons with the tulip mania of the 17th century, where speculation drove the price of tulip bulbs to extraordinary levels before the bubble eventually burst.

Alan Greenspan, former chairman of the Federal Reserve, has expressed confusion over the intrinsic value of Bitcoin, stating that one has to "stretch their imagination" to understand its backing. Similarly, Henry Blodget, founder of Business Insider, asserts that Bitcoin has "no intrinsic value." Paul Krugman, a renowned economist, agrees, arguing that Bitcoin's value as a medium of exchange does not make it a stable store of value, a crucial aspect of successful money.

The utility of Bitcoin as a cryptocurrency is often cited as its intrinsic value. However, this argument falls short when compared to other assets like gold, which has intrinsic value beyond its use as a medium of exchange. Gold, for example, has malleability and resistance to tarnishing, making it useful for manufacturing and jewellery, regardless of its scarcity. On the other hand, Bitcoin's utility is limited to its role as a medium of exchange, and it does not offer any tangible benefits outside of this context.

The Libertarian belief that money must have a physical basis of value has further complicated the discussion around Bitcoin's intrinsic value. This perspective holds that fiat currencies, such as the dollar or euro, are not true money because they are not backed by physical commodities. However, fiat currencies are backed by the 'full faith and credit' of the issuing countries, giving them a form of intrinsic value that Bitcoin lacks by design.

Bitcoin's value is derived from the belief that it can supplement or replace traditional currencies and financial institutions, offering seamless transactions without the involvement of banks or governments. However, this promise of disruption is yet to be fully realised, and the lack of widespread adoption underscores the uncertainty surrounding its intrinsic value.

In conclusion, the lack of inherent value in Bitcoin is a significant concern for potential investors. Its price is driven solely by investor demand, and its utility as a cryptocurrency does not provide the same intrinsic value as assets like gold. While some argue that the ability to mine Bitcoin gives it intrinsic value, the complex and shrinking nature of the mining process adds further risk and uncertainty to Bitcoin's long-term prospects.

Frequently asked questions