Ethena Crypto: Worthy Investment Or Risky Gamble?

Ethena is a decentralised protocol centred on the yield-bearing USDe stablecoin. It has attracted a lot of attention for its high yields, which are currently at an annualized rate of about 37%. However, this has also led to comparisons with Terra Luna's UST, which failed in 2021, resulting in bankruptcy for several crypto firms. Ethena's USDe is a synthetic stablecoin, which is collateralised with crypto assets and short futures positions. This strategy allows it to offer a censorship-resistant, scalable, and stable form of digital currency.

While some have expressed concerns about the sustainability of Ethena's yields, others have pointed out that the protocol has addressed the risks and implemented safeguards. However, it is important to note that the long-term viability of synthetic stablecoins like USDe is uncertain due to regulatory and market unpredictability.

As with any investment, it is essential to do your own research and understand the risks involved before deciding whether to invest in Ethena or any other cryptocurrency.

Ethena's USDe stablecoin

The cash-and-carry trade strategy is a form of arbitrage that exists when the futures price of an asset is higher than the spot price. In this case, the asset (ETH) is bought and a corresponding short position is opened in the derivatives market. This is a common strategy in traditional finance and doesn't carry directional or delta risk.

The funding rate or carry is a key component of Ethena's yields. It is the premium paid by long positions in ETH futures to those in short positions, and it can be lucrative during bullish markets. This contributes to the high yields seen with USDe.

USDe is not a traditional stablecoin like USDT or USDC, which are pegged to fiat currencies. Instead, it is backed by crypto assets and its stability is maintained through derivatives and hedging strategies.

While USDe offers an innovative approach to stablecoins and has seen rapid growth, there are potential risks to consider. These include counterparty risk, funding rate risk, liquidity risk, and regulatory risk. The long-term viability of synthetic stablecoins like USDe is uncertain due to regulatory uncertainties and market unpredictability.

In conclusion, while Ethena's USDe stablecoin offers an attractive yield-bearing instrument, it is important for investors to carefully consider the potential risks and the stability of the broader crypto market before investing.

High yield, high risk

Ethena's USDe stablecoin has been making waves in the crypto world, offering a high annualized yield of around 37% for users who stake their USDe tokens for a minimum of seven days. This has led to a surge in Ethena's total value locked (TVL), which increased 12-fold from $178 million to $2.3 billion in just 60 days. However, it's important to remember that high yield often comes with high risk. So, what are the risks associated with investing in Ethena?

Firstly, there is counterparty risk. Ethena relies on multiple exchanges, such as Binance, OKX, Deribit, and Kraken, to execute its trading strategies. Any issues with these exchanges, such as security breaches or insolvency, could impact Ethena's ability to honour its yield commitments.

Secondly, there is the risk of a funding rates reversal. Ethena's yield generation strategy hinges on positive funding rates for bitcoin (BTC) and ether (ETH) perpetuals, which means long positions pay short positions. However, funding rates typically flip negative in falling markets, which could dry up Ethena's yield source if the crypto market enters another bear cycle.

Thirdly, there is the risk of regulatory action. Ethena's structure and operations may raise red flags for regulators, particularly in the US, where the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been actively pursuing enforcement actions against crypto projects. If Ethena is found to be in violation of securities laws, it could face significant fines and legal challenges, which could negatively impact its operations and the value of its tokens.

Another risk to consider is the complexity and potential vulnerabilities of Ethena's delta hedging strategy. While delta hedging is designed to mitigate directional risk, it is not immune to market fluctuations and may not provide adequate protection in extreme scenarios. Additionally, there is a risk of liquidity issues, especially during periods of high volatility or market stress, which could hinder users' ability to trade or redeem their USDe tokens.

Lastly, there is the risk of a collapse in the value of the collateral backing USDe. While Ethena claims that USDe is fully collateralized and backed by crypto assets, there is still a possibility of a collapse in the value of these assets, similar to what happened with Terra's UST stablecoin.

In conclusion, while Ethena offers a potentially attractive high yield, it also comes with significant risks. Investors considering Ethena should carefully weigh these risks and conduct thorough due diligence before making any investment decisions.

Comparison to Terra's UST

Ethena's USDe stablecoin has been compared to Terra's UST, which failed in 2022. Both are not fiat-backed cryptocurrencies like Tether's USDT or Circle's USDC, but there are important differences between the two. UST maintained its peg via an algorithmic, burn-and-mint mechanism, while USDe keeps its stability through a delta-neutral strategy that includes "basis trading," a common method in traditional finance. UST's peg was derived from the arbitrage users could execute when the token was trading at a discount or premium to the dollar. On the Terra blockchain, users could mint $1 of UST by burning $1 worth of its sister token LUNA, and vice versa. This meant that UST and LUNA depended on each other to be valuable, and when people realized that LUNA didn't have real value, the whole system collapsed.

In contrast, USDe is backed by fully liquid collateral like Ethereum, which has a well-understood and observable market value. USDe's peg mechanism involves simultaneously going long and short on ETH. Ethena establishes a long position by staking ETH to earn rewards and then opens a corresponding short perpetual position for the same dollar value on a derivatives exchange. Theoretically, for all price movements of ETH, Ethena has zero exposure as the protocol loses and makes $1 for every dollar that ETH goes down and up, respectively. This keeps the USD value of the collateral relatively stable.

The high yields offered by UST and USDe are also similar, but there are differences in where these yields come from. UST's yield came partly from staking rewards, but mostly from marketing incentives. USDe's yield, on the other hand, comes from rewards from staking ETH and the funding rate earned by Ethena for opening short derivative positions. Since traders currently have substantial leveraged long positions on futures derivatives markets, Ethena's yield is super high.

Even though USDe’s peg mechanism is different from UST’s, it is not without risks. One risk mentioned by Columbia Business School adjunct professor and Paxos’ former head of portfolio management Austin Campbell is the credit risk stemming from the protocols and platforms Ethena is using for its futures trading. If Ethena is conducting its future trades on a protocol that gets hacked or on a centralized exchange that goes bankrupt, they would be in trouble. However, the difference between the peg mechanisms of USDe and UST is sufficient for some crypto experts to assign less risk to USDe.

While there are similarities between Ethena's USDe and Terra's UST, there are also important differences, particularly in the level of collateralization and the mechanisms used to maintain their pegs. USDe's collateralization and use of delta-neutral strategies to maintain its peg are seen by some as reducing the risks associated with the stablecoin. However, the high yields offered by USDe and the regulatory risks it faces have led to concerns about its sustainability and potential for regulatory action.

Delta hedging

When an investor buys or sells options, they offset the delta risk by buying or selling an equivalent amount of stock or exchange-traded fund (ETF) shares. In the case of Ethena, they stake the collateral and create an equal short position to neutralize the risk. This ensures that the value of the collateral remains stable, even during market fluctuations.

In the context of options trading, delta hedging seeks to be directionally neutral by establishing offsetting long and short positions in the same underlying asset. This isolation of volatility changes can be advantageous for options traders.

Additionally, delta hedging can be applied to equities as well. In this case, one share of the underlying stock has a delta of one, indicating that the stock's value changes by $1. An investor could delta hedge a call option by shorting the equivalent number of shares in the underlying stock.

Overall, delta hedging is a complex strategy that can help traders manage the directional risk associated with price movements in the underlying asset. However, it requires careful monitoring and adjustments to maintain a delta-neutral position.

Regulatory risks

Regulatory Classification and Compliance:

The first regulatory risk to consider is how regulatory bodies might classify Ethena's USDe stablecoin. As a synthetic stablecoin backed by crypto assets and short futures positions, USDe occupies a relatively new space in the crypto market. Regulatory frameworks are still evolving to catch up with innovations in decentralised finance (DeFi). This lack of clear regulatory guidance makes it difficult to determine which specific rules and regulations apply to Ethena.

For example, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has not yet provided explicit guidance on how it views synthetic stablecoins. There is a risk that they could be classified as securities, which would subject Ethena to stringent regulatory requirements and potentially limit their ability to operate in certain jurisdictions.

Regulatory Uncertainty in the Crypto Space:

The crypto industry as a whole is facing increasing regulatory scrutiny, and the regulatory landscape is constantly evolving. This uncertainty creates a challenging environment for crypto projects like Ethena. Changes in regulations or enforcement actions by regulatory bodies could significantly impact Ethena's ability to operate and expose them to legal risks.

Regulatory Action Against Stablecoins:

Stablecoins have come under increased regulatory scrutiny in recent years, with concerns being raised about their potential impact on financial stability and their lack of transparency. In 2023, the US Treasury Department issued a report outlining several risks associated with stablecoins and calling for greater regulatory oversight. This report led to a wave of regulatory actions and proposals aimed at stablecoins.

As a stablecoin project, Ethena could find itself in the crosshairs of regulatory bodies, particularly if there are concerns about the stability or transparency of its USDe token. Regulatory actions could range from increased reporting and disclosure requirements to outright bans on certain activities or operations.

Cross-Border Regulatory Challenges:

The decentralised nature of crypto means that projects like Ethena often have users and operations spanning multiple jurisdictions. This creates a complex web of regulatory requirements and compliance challenges. Ethena must navigate different regulatory frameworks, licensing requirements, and consumer protection laws in various countries and regions. Failure to comply with these diverse regulatory environments could result in fines, legal action, or restrictions on their ability to operate in certain jurisdictions.

As a decentralised protocol, Ethena may face additional regulatory challenges due to the evolving nature of regulations around DeFi. Regulatory bodies are still formulating their approach to DeFi, and there is a risk that future regulations could restrict certain activities or require more stringent compliance measures.

Additionally, the anonymous and pseudonymous nature of many DeFi protocols can make them attractive for money laundering, sanctions evasion, or other illicit activities. Regulatory actions targeting these concerns could impact legitimate projects like Ethena, potentially imposing more stringent know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) requirements.

Impact on Investor Confidence and Market Sentiment:

In conclusion, regulatory risks are a significant consideration for any potential investment in Ethena. While the project has taken steps to ensure compliance and mitigate regulatory risks, the evolving nature of the regulatory landscape means that these risks should be carefully monitored and assessed when making investment decisions.

Frequently asked questions