Funds Of Funds: Active Or Passive Investing?

Active investing is an investment strategy that involves ongoing buying and selling activity by the investor. Actively managed funds try to beat market returns with investments hand-picked by professional money managers. Active investing is highly involved and requires a hands-on approach, typically by a portfolio manager or other active participant. The fund manager has more involvement in the decision-making process, actively looking after which stocks and bonds go in and out of a mutual fund portfolio and when.

A fund of funds is an example of an actively managed fund. Actively managed funds can be beneficial for investors who want to beat the market and are willing to take on more risk. However, it is important to note that active investing can be more costly due to higher fund management fees and more frequent trading.

Active investing is more expensive

Active investing is generally more expensive than passive investing. Active investing involves a fund manager who is actively involved in the decision-making process, selecting investments based on an independent assessment of their worth. The goal of active investing is to "beat the market" and outperform certain benchmarks. This process requires the expertise of a fund manager and a team of analysts, who will charge higher fees for their services. These fees can include the expense ratio, management fees, and transaction costs incurred by active buying and selling.

The Investment Company Institute reports that the average expense ratio for an actively managed equity fund is 0.68%, compared to only 0.06% for a passive equity fund. These higher fees can eat into investment returns over time.

In contrast, passive investing involves buying and holding investments that mirror a specific market index, such as the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Passive investing does not require the same level of active management and, therefore, tends to have lower fees. Passive funds simply need to replicate the index they track, resulting in ultra-low fees.

While active investing may offer more flexibility and the potential for higher returns, it comes at a cost. The higher fees associated with active investing can make it more challenging for active managers to outperform their passive counterparts consistently. As a result, passive investing has often outperformed active investing due to its lower fees.

However, it is important to note that the decision between active and passive investing depends on various factors, including an investor's risk tolerance, financial goals, and time horizon. Some investors may be willing to pay higher fees for the potential of higher returns, while others may prioritize lower costs and a more passive approach. Ultimately, the choice between active and passive investing should be based on an investor's individual circumstances and preferences.

Actively managed funds can be riskier

The higher fees of actively managed funds can eat into returns, and historically, these funds have often underperformed their passive counterparts. Research by Wharton faculty and others has shown that, in many cases, active investment managers' stock picks do not justify their high fees. Over a 10-year period, active mutual fund managers' returns trailed passive funds consistently. After-tax returns for managers of large- and mid-sized companies were lower than those of their index-style competitors 97% of the time, while managers of small-cap stocks trailed 77% of the time.

However, actively managed funds can have advantages in certain situations. They offer more flexibility because managers are not required to hold specific stocks or bonds. They also provide hedging capabilities through short sales and put options, and they can employ strategies for risk management and tax management tailored to individual investors. Additionally, actively managed funds can have a better chance of outperforming during periods of market volatility.

When considering actively managed funds, investors should evaluate the fund manager's track record over several years to assess performance across different market cycles. It is also crucial to review the fund's holdings to ensure they align with the investor's goals and do not merely mirror an index, which would resemble passive investing.

In summary, actively managed funds introduce the risk of underperformance due to the potential for human error in investment decisions. This risk, along with higher fees, can make these funds riskier than passively managed funds. However, they may be suitable for investors seeking active management and willing to take on higher risk for the potential of higher returns.

Passive investing has lower fees

Passive investing is an investment strategy that aims to maximise returns by reducing the costs of buying and selling securities. It is typically done by investing in a mutual fund or exchange-traded fund (ETF) that mimics the index's holdings. Passive investing is less expensive and complex than active management, and it often produces superior after-tax results over medium to long time horizons.

Passive investing methods seek to reduce the costs of selecting investments by simplifying the portfolio construction process and reducing the fees triggered by frequent trading. Index mutual funds are larger on average than actively managed funds, so economies of scale help lower relative costs.

• Relying on rigid formulas to pick securities eliminates costly research, so index funds tend to be less expensive to operate than actively managed funds.
• Passive funds are not required to hold specific stocks or bonds, so they avoid the transaction costs associated with active trading.
• Passive funds are not subject to the same extensive research and analysis required to beat index returns, so they do not need to charge higher fees to cover these costs.

The benefits of passive investing include:

• Very low fees
• Good transparency
• Tax efficiency
• Lower risk
• Simplicity

However, there are also some drawbacks to passive investing, such as lack of flexibility and smaller potential returns. It is important to consider the trade-offs involved when deciding between passive and active investing.

Active investing is more hands-on

Active investing is a strategy that seeks to beat the market and generate higher returns than passive investing. It involves a more hands-on approach, with investors or fund managers actively buying and selling stocks or other investments based on their performance or expected performance. This requires a deeper analysis of qualitative and quantitative factors and expertise in knowing when to enter or exit a particular investment.

In contrast, passive investing involves holding investments for the long term, often by purchasing shares of index funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track a market index such as the S&P 500 or Dow Jones Industrial Average. Passive investors aim to duplicate the market's performance rather than trying to outperform it. This strategy is often favoured by those who want to take a hands-off approach and keep costs low.

Active investing requires a portfolio manager or active participant to oversee the investments. They will usually have a team of analysts who examine various factors and use established metrics to decide when and if to buy or sell. This hands-on approach allows active investors to react more nimbly to changes in the broader economy, such as prolonged volatility or higher-risk equities.

The hands-on nature of active investing also means that investors can access a broader range of investment options, such as private equity, real estate, hedge funds, or philanthropic organisations. It also allows investors with high concentrations or legacy positions in a particular organisation or industry to correct exposure and reduce risk by rebalancing their portfolio while retaining their existing positions.

Additionally, active investing provides access to other financial resources and services offered by financial institutions, such as estate planning, escrow and trust services, private banking, and commercial banking solutions. It is a more flexible strategy, allowing investors to hedge their bets using techniques like short sales or put options and exit specific stocks or sectors when risks become too significant.

However, active investing generally comes with higher fees, typically ranging from 0.2% to 2% of the assets under management (AUM) annually. These higher fees are due to the extensive research, analysis, and transaction costs associated with active investing.

In summary, active investing is a more hands-on approach that requires investors or fund managers to actively manage their portfolios by buying and selling investments based on performance. This strategy aims to beat the market and generate higher returns but comes with higher fees and a greater commitment of time and resources.

Passive investing is better for well-researched markets

Passive investing is an investment strategy that aims to maximise returns by minimising the costs of buying and selling securities. It is typically done by investing in a mutual fund or exchange-traded fund (ETF) that mimics the index's holdings. This strategy is called passive investing because the fund managers do not have to actively hunt for investments; they simply buy and sell the investments that their target benchmark trades.

• Lower fees: Passive funds have lower expense ratios compared to active funds. According to Sebi regulations, the expense ratio for ETFs cannot exceed 1%, whereas actively managed funds typically have higher operating costs. The higher fees of active funds are due to the greater human input and the need to pay for expensive managers.
• Broader market exposure: Passive funds, such as indices like the Total Market Index, give investors access to a wide range of stocks with a single investment. This provides a broader view of the stock market and helps investors diversify their portfolio.
• Tax efficiency: Passive funds that use a buy-and-hold strategy typically generate low or no taxable capital gains annually for shareholders. This is because the index fund's buy-and-hold style does not trigger large annual capital gains taxes.
• Simplicity: Owning an index or group of indices is easier to implement and understand than a dynamic strategy that requires constant research and adjustment. Passive funds are run by algorithms that track the performance of an index, so they are not reliant on the abilities of a stock-picking manager.
• Performance: While passive funds rarely beat their benchmark index, they can still provide moderate returns that may be equal to or slightly lower than the benchmark's returns. This is because passive funds are designed to closely track their benchmark index rather than outperform it.

In well-researched markets, where there is relatively little differentiation, passive investing offers an easy and low-cost way to invest. It is important to note that the choice between active and passive investing depends on the investor's profile and goals. Some investors may prefer the flexibility and potential for higher returns offered by active investing, while others may prefer the lower costs and simplicity of passive investing.

Frequently asked questions