Equity Investment: Factors Leading To Decreased Funding

Equity investment refers to the ownership of a company, either by individuals or entities. There are several reasons why equity investment might decrease. For example, a company might lose money during the normal course of business, prompting owners to move their equity into normal business operations. A decrease in equity investment can also occur when an owner withdraws money for personal use, or when an unusual event – such as a natural disaster – requires owners to invest equity in replacing assets. A negative shareholders' equity, where a company's debts exceed its assets, is often a warning sign for investors.

Loss of ownership, influence or control

Loss of Ownership, Influence, or Control

Equity refers to the ownership of a company, be it by individuals or entities. Owners' equity can be generated through paid-in capital or retained earnings. When starting a company, owners often pay for part of it with their own money and receive shares proportionate to their investments. However, owners' investments are not limited to their original investment amounts. Owners can increase their investment once the company is operational, thus garnering additional shares.

A decrease in ownership, influence, or control can occur in several ways. Firstly, an investor may lose a controlling financial interest in an investee but retain a non-controlling investment that still holds significant influence. In such a case, the investor should apply the equity method to their retained interest. This change in interest transactions generally results in the recognition of a gain or loss in net income for the sale of the controlling interest and the remeasurement of any retained non-controlling investment at fair value.

Secondly, an investor that applies the equity method of accounting may reduce its ownership interest in the investee by selling a portion of its shares or through an investee transaction. When disposing of a portion of an equity method investment, the investor needs to determine the applicable gain or loss on disposition. A gain or loss on disposal is recorded when the selling price per share differs from the investor's carrying amount per share.

Thirdly, an investor may lose significant influence over the investee entity due to several factors, including the sale of a portion of its investment, the issuance or purchase of shares by the investee, or changes to the investee's governing documents. If an investor loses significant influence, they should discontinue accruing their share of earnings or losses of the investee. The investor would no longer have a say in the investee's decision-making, thus reducing their ownership influence or control.

Lastly, an investor may fully dispose of an equity method investment. For the calculation of the gain or loss of the investment sold, the carrying amount of the stock sold would include a proportionate share of the investor's basis differences. A full disposal of an investment would result in a complete loss of ownership, influence, or control for the investor.

Accumulated losses over time

Accumulated losses over several quarters or years can result in negative shareholders' equity. This is a red flag for stock investors, as it indicates that a company's debts exceed its assets. In other words, the company's financial distress means that shareholders would receive nothing if the company declared bankruptcy and was forced to liquidate its assets.

The balance sheet's shareholders' equity section includes retained earnings, which indicate the balance left over from profits, or net income. This is the money that can be set aside to pay dividends, reduce debt, or reinvest in the company. After a net loss, the deficit is carried over into retained earnings as a negative number and deducted from any balance left from prior periods.

Retained earnings are the cumulative profits a company has earned over its history that have not been distributed as dividends. As a result, a negative stockholders' equity could mean a company has incurred losses for multiple periods, to the extent that the existing retained earnings and any funds received from issuing stock have been exceeded.

For investors, a negative stockholders' equity is a traditional warning sign of financial instability. It can damage a company's ability to secure financing or investment. It can also make it difficult for investors to assess the company's financial health using traditional metrics since a negative stockholders' equity can skew important financial ratios like the debt-to-equity ratio.

Large dividend payments

Companies may issue large dividends for various reasons, such as a short-term stock boost, meeting investor expectations, competitive pressure, or overconfidence in future earnings. However, this can be a warning sign for investors, suggesting financial distress and a potential risk of bankruptcy.

Additionally, large dividend payments can deplete retained earnings, especially when combined with financial losses in subsequent periods. This can further contribute to a negative balance in shareholders' equity and negatively impact the company's financial health and stability.

To avoid negative shareholders' equity, companies might consider issuing new shares to raise funds instead of paying out large dividends. However, this approach can dilute the value of outstanding shares, potentially leading to a drop in share prices. Therefore, companies must carefully consider their financial situation and future earnings projections before deciding on dividend payments to ensure they do not negatively impact equity investment.

Excessive debt

Moreover, excessive debt makes a business unattractive to prospective lenders, creditors, and investors. The business has limited flexibility to find new financing or buy new equipment or supplies on credit. The business may also struggle to expand or grow without profit or funding sources.

On a broader scale, there are at least four separate consequences of rising debt that can adversely affect the economy: transfers, financial distress, bezzle (or fictional wealth), and additional spillover adjustment costs termed hysteresis. When rising government debt creates an imbalance between total demand and total supply, there must be an adjustment mechanism to restore equilibrium by transferring income from one sector of the economy to another. This transfer mechanism can distort the economy and directly undermine growth.

Rising debt can also indirectly undermine economic growth by causing uncertainty about how debt-servicing costs will be allocated. This uncertainty can lead to behavioural changes that protect certain sectors of the economy, which in turn can undermine growth, increase financial fragility, or both.

Additionally, excessive debt can encourage the creation of fictitious wealth or "bezzle", which can distort economic behaviour. This can take the form of soaring asset prices, such as stocks and real estate, that exceed their fundamental value, or non-productive investment that is capitalised instead of expensed, artificially boosting net income and wealth.

Finally, rising debt can create a kind of hysteresis, where the adjustment mechanism to equilibrate demand and supply leads to additional future adjustment costs. For example, rising government debt can trigger a financial crisis, resulting in debt-driven deflation or a political crisis.

In summary, excessive debt can decrease equity investment by making a business less attractive to investors and constraining its ability to expand and grow. On a broader scale, excessive debt can undermine economic growth and stability, creating an unfavourable environment for equity investment.

Natural disasters

Direct Economic Costs: Natural disasters can cause extensive damage to physical assets, including commercial buildings, homes, roads, and power lines. The cost of renovating and rebuilding can be substantial, and these direct expenses fall on businesses, individual property owners, and governments. For example, Hurricane Harvey in 2017 resulted in approximately $125 billion in damage, with costs covered by various public and private sources.

Disruption to Businesses: Natural disasters can disrupt business operations, leading to lost revenue and decreased productivity. Businesses may suffer direct expenses, such as the cost of repairing damaged property and equipment, as well as indirect costs due to interruptions in production and sales. Major storms can be particularly detrimental to local businesses, including stores and restaurants that rely on the local customer base.

Impact on Financial Markets: Natural disasters can also influence financial markets and stock prices. Research has shown that natural disasters cause the greatest damage to the economy among different types of negative events. Stock indices tend to decrease on the day of a natural disaster and remain lower in the following days. This provides arbitrage profit opportunities for investors, who can short-sell the index during and immediately after the disaster.

Human Capital and Socio-Economic Factors: Natural disasters can have a significant impact on human capital, which in turn affects economic growth. They can lead to casualties and displacement of people, disrupting the workforce and affecting businesses' ability to operate. Additionally, socio-economic policies play a crucial role in mitigating the economic losses caused by natural disasters, especially in vulnerable and poor settlements in developing countries.

Frequency and Severity: The frequency and severity of natural disasters have been increasing due to climate change and the expansion of human settlements into vulnerable areas. As a result, the financial impact of these disasters is becoming more costly. According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there has been a rise in the number of climate and weather events causing damage of $1 billion or more in recent years.

Overall, natural disasters can decrease equity investment by causing economic damage, disrupting businesses, influencing financial markets, and impacting human capital. The recovery process often involves significant expenses and can take time, especially in regions with limited resources and inadequate infrastructure.

Frequently asked questions