Bitcoin: Dumb Investment Or Smart Bet?

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have become increasingly popular in recent years, with some people viewing them as the future of finance and a way to build wealth. However, others argue that investing in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin is a dumb or stupid decision. So, what's the deal? Well, it's complicated. On the one hand, Bitcoin has been criticised for its negative environmental impact, potential to destabilise world finance, facilitation of crime, and its volatile and complex nature. On the other hand, some people argue that it's a groundbreaking innovation that offers a decentralised and secure way to transfer value. The truth probably lies somewhere in between, and it's essential to do your research and understand the risks before investing in anything, especially something as volatile and unregulated as cryptocurrency.

Bitcoin's negative environmental impact

Firstly, Bitcoin mining is a highly electricity-intensive process. Miners compete to solve complex cryptographic puzzles, requiring dedicated software and specialized computer hardware. The energy-intensive nature of Bitcoin mining stems from the design of the transaction validation process, which relies on the computational power of thousands of computers to maintain the security of the blockchain. This high energy consumption has a notable environmental impact, with Bitcoin mining using more energy than some small countries. For instance, the Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index estimates that Bitcoin mining uses approximately 140 Terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity annually, which is around 0.63% of global electricity production. This energy consumption is greater than that of countries such as Pakistan and Ukraine.

Secondly, Bitcoin mining relies heavily on fossil fuels for electricity generation, contributing to carbon emissions. According to the United Nations University, 67% of the electricity consumed for Bitcoin mining in 2020-2021 was produced from fossil fuels, with coal being the primary source, accounting for 45% of the energy mix. This heavy reliance on fossil fuels has a significant carbon footprint. To offset the carbon emissions from Bitcoin mining in 2021-2022, it is estimated that 3.9 billion trees would need to be planted, covering an area comparable to the Netherlands, Switzerland, or 7% of the Amazon rainforest.

Thirdly, Bitcoin mining also has a substantial water footprint. The water consumption associated with Bitcoin mining is considerable, with its global water footprint in 2020-2021 reaching 1.65 km3. This water usage exceeds the domestic water needs of over 300 million people in rural sub-Saharan Africa.

Lastly, Bitcoin mining generates significant electronic waste. The specialized computer hardware used for Bitcoin mining has a short lifespan due to continuous hardware obsolescence, resulting in substantial electronic waste. The amount of e-waste generated by Bitcoin mining is comparable to that produced by the Netherlands.

In conclusion, Bitcoin's negative environmental impact is evident in its high energy consumption, carbon emissions, water usage, and electronic waste generation. These impacts have drawn the attention of regulators and led to incentives or restrictions in various jurisdictions. Urgent regulatory interventions and technological advancements are needed to mitigate the environmental consequences of Bitcoin and the broader digital currency sector.

Bitcoin's potential to destabilize world finance

Bitcoin has the potential to destabilize world finance in several ways. Firstly, it can undermine the role of governments and central banks in the financial system. Bitcoin's decentralized nature eliminates the need for intermediaries such as banks and financial institutions, which are traditionally used by governments to distribute, regulate, and tax the flow of money in an economy. This can potentially disrupt the existing financial infrastructure and reduce the government's ability to manage and regulate economic policy.

Secondly, Bitcoin can be used to circumvent capital controls imposed by governments. For example, in China, citizens have an annual limit on the amount of foreign currency they can purchase. However, through the use of Bitcoin, Chinese citizens may have converted local currency to Bitcoin and transferred it across borders, bypassing government regulations. This can lead to a loss of control over a country's currency and economy.

Thirdly, Bitcoin has been associated with illicit activities and criminal enterprises. Its pseudonymous nature and the lack of regulatory oversight make it attractive for illegal transactions, such as ransomware attacks, darknet activities, and sanctioned entity transactions. This can undermine the trust in the financial system and potentially lead to increased criminal activities.

Additionally, Bitcoin has been criticized for its negative environmental impact, with mining operations consuming massive amounts of energy and generating significant electronic waste. This has led to concerns about the sustainability and long-term viability of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

While Bitcoin has its advantages, such as streamlining transactions and reducing fees, its potential to destabilize world finance cannot be overlooked. The lack of regulation, circumvention of capital controls, association with criminal activities, and environmental concerns pose significant challenges to the stability and integrity of the global financial system.

Bitcoin's facilitation of crime

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have become increasingly popular in recent years, but their use also extends to the facilitation of criminal activities. The anonymous and decentralised nature of blockchain technology has made it easier for criminals to operate, stalling financial investigations and allowing for the increased use of crypto in crimes.

One of the most prominent uses of cryptocurrency in crime is in ransomware attacks. In these attacks, hackers infiltrate a system and threaten to release sensitive data or prevent system access unless a ransom is paid. Cryptocurrency enables borderless transactions among multiple anonymous parties, making it an ideal tool for hackers to receive ransom payments. The U.S. Justice Department announced in early 2023 that it had disrupted the Hive ransomware group, which had received over $100 million in crypto ransomware payments.

Another way criminals use cryptocurrency is through scams. Cryptocurrencies are an ideal vehicle for scams as they are instant, anonymous, borderless, and require no formality between parties. One of the most well-known scams is the Ponzi scheme PlusToken, which defrauded millions of victims out of $2.35 billion.

Darknet marketplaces are another form of cryptocurrency crime, where illicit goods and services such as drugs, stolen data, arms, and human trafficking are bought and sold. These marketplaces are hosted on the dark web and can only be accessed through specific browsers, allowing for secured and anonymous browsing. Darknet marketplaces and fraud shops accounted for over $1.5 billion worth of cryptocurrency transactions in 2022.

Cryptocurrency theft is also a significant issue, with hackers employing various tactics to steal cryptocurrency from victims. In 2022, hackers stole a total of $4 billion worth of crypto, with the largest crypto hack being the $625 million heist from the Ronin Network.

Terrorist organisations also exploit cryptocurrency to fund their operations, soliciting requests for funds on their websites, social media, encrypted messaging applications, and the dark web. In June 2023, Israel seized crypto accounts linked to two terror groups, confiscating $1.7 million in terror funds.

The anonymous and borderless nature of cryptocurrency makes it challenging for law enforcement and security agencies to catch crypto criminals. However, authorities are constantly developing new methods to enhance their investigations and bring criminals to justice.

Bitcoin's poor product design

Bitcoin is a prototype for what is now known as cryptocurrency. It was the first of its kind, designed by someone (or a group) going by the name Satoshi Nakamoto. The original paper outlining the proposal for the currency is well-written but reads more like a working paper – an initial proposal, not a fully thought-out master plan.

Bitcoin was created as a medium of exchange, not an investment. The whole philosophy underlying the technical implementation is based on the idea that an equivalent for cash that can be transferred over the internet as a means to pay for goods or services is desirable. However, its product design has some inherent flaws.

Firstly, Bitcoin was designed so that new Bitcoins are created ('mined') at a predetermined and gradually decelerating speed. This limited supply was supposed to be a clever design feature, but it has turned Bitcoin into a speculative asset. The problem is that the amount of the currency doesn't increase in line with the number of people using it. This has resulted in Bitcoin users wanting to use Bitcoin as a speculative investment rather than as a means of payment.

Secondly, Bitcoin rewards the creators of the currency (the 'miners') and early adopters who have become very wealthy, along with speculators who sit on their coins rather than spending them. This means that those who benefit from the currency are not those who use it to trade in the real economy, i.e., people who produce real value and make Bitcoin a viable and usable currency.

Thirdly, Bitcoin is less secure than national currencies. If someone gets access to your password ('private key'), they can spend all your funds. One user left his private key on a hard drive that went to landfill and then saw the value of the coins appreciate to hundreds of thousands of pounds. For all the arguments that Bitcoin is 'safer' because it has no central authority, it is not yet safer in practical terms.

In conclusion, while Bitcoin has some interesting features, its poor product design, including a limited supply that encourages speculation, a reward system that benefits creators and early adopters rather than users, and security issues, make it a risky and unwise investment choice.

Bitcoin as a pyramid scheme

Bitcoin has been described as a Ponzi scheme by JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, who has also called the cryptocurrency a “pet rock”, a “scam”, and a “waste of time”. In a similar vein, Pasadena Star News published an opinion piece that likens Bitcoin to a Ponzi scheme, deeming it "nonsense", a "scam", and a "prank".

The characterization of Bitcoin as a Ponzi scheme is not without merit. A Ponzi scheme is a form of financial fraud in which early investors are paid with funds sourced from new investors, creating the illusion of returns and profitability. This is achieved by continuously bringing new investors into the fold, thereby sustaining the scheme. In the case of Bitcoin, the value of the cryptocurrency is derived from a form of recursive speculation, where investors speculate that more people will invest in Bitcoin, driving up its value. This can be likened to a game of musical chairs, where investors hope that they will not be left without a chair when the music stops.

The “postmodern” twist to the Bitcoin Ponzi scheme lies in the public nature of the operations and the role of media in perpetuating a haze of obscurantism, distrust in experts, and confusion. While sophisticated investors understand the mechanism of the fraud, the scheme thrives on the collective ignorance or overconfidence of individuals who believe they can time their market exit properly. This is akin to gamblers who feel their spin on the roulette wheel is lucky.

Furthermore, Bitcoin shares similarities with multi-level marketing schemes, which are considered scams due to their underlying economic structure. In the case of Bitcoin, software developers perpetuate a narrative of disruptive software that will generate vast wealth for early adopters, enticing them to convince others to invest as well.

The economic structure of Bitcoin has also been criticized as unsound, with critics arguing that it produces nothing, has no assets, income, customers, cash flow, or dividends. The net present value of Bitcoin is argued to be zero, and it is unsuitable for monetary purposes or transactions as a unit of exchange.

Frequently asked questions