Savings Surplus: Impact On Economy And Investment Opportunities

When savings exceed investment, there are several potential outcomes for the economy. Firstly, national income may rise, fall, or remain unaffected. Additionally, according to the loanable funds theory, an excess of savings over investment can lead to a decline in interest rates as the supply of funds increases. This theory, supported by most economists, suggests that savings provide the source of funds for investments. However, critics argue that this theory neglects the role of money as a means of finance. Instead, they propose a monetary theory, where household savings do not release new funds for investment but simply redistribute existing funds. This perspective highlights that savings can impact the IS-curve, representing the relationship between interest rates and the economy, but do not directly influence the financial system depicted by the LM-curve.

National income rises

The impact of savings exceeding investment on national income is a complex issue that can be analysed through both "real analysis" and "monetary analysis" frameworks. While it is generally accepted that a higher propensity to save can lead to a decline in interest rates, the effect on national income is multifaceted and depends on various factors. Here is an examination of the scenario where national income rises when savings exceed investment:

In this scenario, when savings exceed investment, it indicates that individuals or households are choosing to save more of their income rather than spend it on consumption or investment goods. This increased saving rate can lead to a rise in national income through several mechanisms. Firstly, higher savings can lead to an increase in aggregate demand as individuals may be saving for significant purchases or investments in the future. This deferred consumption can lead to a buildup of demand, which businesses will eventually need to meet by increasing production. As a result, businesses will require more labour, capital, and resources, leading to higher economic output and, consequently, a rise in national income.

Secondly, higher savings can lead to an increase in investment. While it may seem counterintuitive, excess savings in the hands of financial institutions can lead to increased lending and investment activities. Banks and financial institutions play a crucial role in this process, as they can utilise the excess savings to provide loans or invest in various projects. This increase in investment will stimulate economic growth, create jobs, and contribute to a rise in national income.

Additionally, it is important to consider the impact of savings on investment from a "monetary analysis" perspective. In this framework, savings do not directly release new funds for investment but instead redistribute existing financial funds from firms to households. When households save more, their money holdings increase, while the money holdings of firms decrease. This redistribution of funds can stimulate investment activity as firms seek to maintain or expand their operations. As firms invest in new projects, expand their capacity, or develop new products, the economy grows, leading to a rise in national income.

Furthermore, the excess savings can have a positive impact on the country's net financial position. A higher level of savings indicates that individuals or households are contributing more to the overall financial resources available in the economy. This increase in financial assets can lead to improved financial stability and reduced reliance on external borrowing. As a result, the country's balance of payments may improve, and the overall economic outlook may become more favourable, contributing to a rise in national income.

Lastly, it is worth noting that the relationship between savings and investment is complex and subject to various economic factors and policies. While excess savings can lead to a rise in national income, it is not a straightforward cause-and-effect relationship. Other factors, such as interest rates, government policies, and external economic conditions, can also influence the impact of excess savings on national income. Therefore, it is essential to consider the broader economic context when analysing the effects of savings exceeding investment.

National income falls

When savings exceed investment, it can lead to a decrease in national income. This occurs through a combination of factors related to consumption, inventory, and output production.

Firstly, when savings are higher than investment, it implies that individuals are consuming less. In other words, the desired level of consumption is not met, resulting in an excess of savings. This can be attributed to various factors such as a decrease in disposable income, a shift in consumer preferences, or an increase in financial prudence.

Consequently, firms are faced with the challenge of reducing output production. This is because the unplanned increase in inventory levels due to lower consumption must be cleared. As a result, they may opt to decrease production to match the reduced demand, which, in turn, impacts the overall national income negatively.

Additionally, in a monetary analysis framework, savings do not directly contribute to investment. Instead, they redistribute existing financial funds from firms to households. This means that when a household decides to save more, their money holdings increase, while the money holdings of the firm decrease, without impacting the aggregate money supply. This can lead to a decrease in the propensity to invest for firms, further exacerbating the decline in national income.

It is important to note that the relationship between savings, investment, and national income is complex and subject to various economic factors and theories. While an excess of savings over investment can lead to a decrease in national income, there may be other factors at play that influence the overall economic outcome.

National income is unaffected

The impact of savings exceeding investment on national income is a complex issue that can be analysed through both "real analysis" and "monetary analysis" frameworks. According to one source, national income can remain unaffected when savings exceed investment. However, this scenario can also lead to rising or falling national income, depending on various factors.

From the perspective of real analysis, savings are considered the source of investment funds. In this view, an increase in savings leads to a higher supply of funds, which can stimulate investment and contribute to economic growth, potentially leading to a rise in national income.

However, critics of real analysis, including prominent economists like Larry Summers and policymakers like Mario Draghi, argue that this perspective overlooks the role of money as a means of finance. They favour a monetary analysis framework, which posits that household savings do not release new funds for investment but simply redistribute existing financial resources from firms to households. In this view, savings can affect the IS-curve, impacting consumption and investment decisions, but do not directly influence the financial system represented by the LM-curve.

The monetary analysis framework also highlights the role of banks and financial markets in investment financing. In this paradigm, investment is financed by money created by banks or provided by individuals holding liquid money balances, rather than relying solely on funds released by savers. This distinction is crucial in understanding how savings and investment interact within the economy and their potential impact on national income.

Furthermore, monetary analysis allows for multiple equilibria displayed by the IS-curve, indicating that various outcomes are possible when savings exceed investment. While it may lead to a rise in national income, as suggested by the real analysis framework, it is equally plausible that national income could fall or remain unchanged.

In conclusion, while the impact of savings exceeding investment on national income is multifaceted, it is important to recognise that the monetary analysis framework offers a more comprehensive understanding by considering the role of money and financial institutions. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that national income may remain unaffected in such scenarios, depending on the specific economic conditions and the interactions between various economic factors.

Excess saving leads to low interest rates

There is a consensus among economists that the global decline in real interest rates can be attributed to a higher propensity to save, largely due to demographic reasons. This view is supported by the loanable funds theory (LFT), which holds that saving is the source of investment, as the abandonment of consumption makes funds available for investment. According to this theory, an increase in the propensity to save increases the supply of funds and leads to a reduction in interest rates.

However, this consensus has been criticised for relying on a commodity theory of finance, which is inadequate for analysing real-world phenomena. Instead, a monetary theory of finance argues that household saving does not release new funds for investment but simply redistributes existing funds. In this view, saving does not directly affect interest rates, as it does not change the overall amount of money in an economy.

The empirical evidence for 'excess saving' is weak. At the global level and in the United States, net saving rates and gross household saving rates have declined significantly since the 1980s. This decline in saving rates contradicts the argument that an increase in saving has caused a decline in interest rates.

While the link between interest rates and saving is not always clear, changes in interest rates can impact saving behaviour. An increase in interest rates can make saving more attractive, as savers will receive higher interest payments on their deposits. Conversely, a decrease in interest rates can reduce the rewards of saving and discourage saving. However, the relationship between interest rates and saving is complex and influenced by various factors, such as economic confidence, financial conditions, wealth, and real wage growth.

Household saving does not release funds for investment

The monetary theory of finance is in contrast to the loanable funds theory, which is considered by most economists to be an adequate representation of the financial system in a modern economy. In the loanable funds theory, saving creates investment. However, this theory has been criticised for its systematic neglect of money as a means of finance.

In the monetary theory, investment is financed with money that is created by banks or provided by individuals holding liquid money balances. This theory also states that banks create deposits by making loans, and that banks are not fundamentally different from other financial intermediaries. Financial intermediaries, in contrast, redistribute existing funds.

The monetary theory of finance also provides an explanation for the global decline in real interest rates, which can be attributed to a higher propensity to save, primarily for demographic reasons.

Frequently asked questions