Big Companies' Fear Of Crypto Investing

While an increasing number of companies are using Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies for investment, operational, and transactional purposes, there are still some big companies that are not investing in cryptocurrency. For instance, despite bold calls in the media, none of the world's ten largest asset managers, including Blackrock, Fidelity, Vanguard, and Goldman Sachs, have directly bought Bitcoin. Most of the top hedge fund managers also continue to swear off Bitcoin.

Regulatory, accounting, and tax issues

The regulatory landscape for digital assets is rapidly evolving. In the US, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) classifies cryptocurrencies and other digital assets as property, with standard property tax rules applying. This means that realized capital losses or gains typically determine crypto tax liability.

The IRS treats crypto assets as properties and has made them subject to rules for transactions of properties. For example, companies that receive crypto assets as payment for goods and services must include the fair value of the crypto assets in their earnings. Companies that sell crypto assets generally recognize capital gain or loss upon the sale.

The US is not alone in this regulatory shift. In the United Kingdom, lawmakers and regulators are making moves to classify cryptocurrency as a regulated asset. In contrast, jurisdictions like Hong Kong are opening up to attract more crypto and web3 businesses.

The lack of clear and consistent global regulation has been a key issue for big companies considering investing in cryptocurrencies. The regulatory landscape is changing quickly, and companies will need to ensure they remain compliant to avoid penalties.

The accounting profession is also facing challenges due to the rise of cryptocurrencies. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) does not have any standards on cryptocurrencies. This lack of clear guidance has led to companies needing to classify crypto assets as indefinite-lived intangible assets on their balance sheets.

The accounting processes for crypto assets are complex and differ from those for traditional assets. For example, companies need to maintain separate accounts for each acquisition of crypto assets to track their different cost bases.

The tax treatment of cryptocurrencies is also a challenge for companies. The rules vary depending on whether the company is holding, trading, spending, or earning cryptocurrency. For example, a company that sells crypto assets may need to recognize an impairment charge if the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying value.

The tax treatment of tokens produced by initial coin offerings (ICOs) also varies across jurisdictions. In some cases, receiving a token via an ICO may be treated as income, while in others, it may be classed as a capital asset subject to capital gains tax only when sold.

The regulatory, accounting, and tax issues surrounding cryptocurrencies are complex and rapidly evolving. Big companies will need to stay abreast of these changes to ensure compliance and effectively manage their crypto investments.

High volatility

Volatility is a statistical measure of the size of price changes experienced by an investment over a given period. The higher the volatility, the larger the price moves. Volatility is usually associated with investment risk.

Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile assets. For example, Bitcoin, the top cryptocurrency, was considered too volatile and fringe to be embraced by serious businesses. However, this taboo has been broken in recent years, with institutional investors like MicroStrategy, Tesla, and Coinbase embracing Bitcoin.

The high volatility of cryptocurrencies can be attributed to various factors, including regional and national economic factors, changes in inflation trends, and industry and sector-specific circumstances. For instance, a scandal or loss of competitive edge by a company can significantly impact the volatility of its stock.

The impact of high volatility on businesses is complex. While it can create opportunities for short-term profits through swing trading, it also increases investment risk. Volatility can make it challenging for companies to make accurate predictions about the performance of their investments or the market as a whole.

Additionally, high volatility can affect companies' investment strategies, particularly for those with a shorter investment timeframe. For example, an individual looking to cash in their pension may be negatively impacted by a surge in volatility if it leads to lower prices. On the other hand, companies with a long-term investment horizon can benefit from volatility by buying shares at lower prices, potentially leading to higher returns.

Lack of regulatory clarity

The lack of regulatory clarity is a significant roadblock to institutional crypto adoption. Institutional investors typically require certainty of regulations, regulatory oversight, and legal clarity before committing significant funds. However, the cryptocurrency space has long been plagued by ambiguity regarding the regulatory status of digital assets. This ambiguity has deterred many large institutions from entering the crypto market.

The regulatory ambiguity surrounding cryptocurrencies stems from the challenge of categorizing them within existing frameworks. Crypto can be classified as a security, a utility, a commodity, a currency, or even a tulip mania. This uncertainty has led to a lack of clear guidelines for companies looking to invest in or utilize cryptocurrency.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been at the center of the regulatory debate. Some critics argue that the SEC has failed to provide the crypto ecosystem with the necessary "regulatory clarity." In response, the SEC has asserted its belief that most cryptocurrencies are securities and has taken enforcement actions against alleged violators of securities laws. However, the crypto industry has pushed back against specific regulatory proposals and frequently calls for more clarity.

The lack of regulatory consensus is not limited to the U.S. but is a global issue. Countries like Estonia, Malta, and Singapore are seen as having a first-mover advantage in financial technology due to their more lenient regulatory environments. On the other hand, regions like the EU, Japan, and Russia have started expanding their regulatory frameworks to manage the risks posed by unregulated crypto markets.

The absence of clear regulations has significant implications for institutional investors. Institutional and corporate interest in cryptocurrencies, DeFi, Web3, and blockchain technology has reached new heights. However, the lack of regulatory clarity, coupled with liquidity and security concerns, has kept many institutions on the sidelines. While some institutional investment has entered the crypto space, it represents only a fraction of the total funds managed by large institutions.

To unlock the floodgates of institutional investment, regulatory bodies must work with the crypto community to establish mutually agreed-upon rules. A robust and dynamic regulatory framework is needed to manage the evolving crypto landscape and provide the clarity that institutions require. This approach will help foster innovation while protecting investors and the broader economy.

Speculative nature of crypto

The speculative nature of cryptocurrencies is one of the main reasons why big companies are hesitant to invest in them. This is because the price of cryptocurrencies is largely driven by speculation and investor attention rather than fundamental economic factors. While cryptocurrencies have seen huge growth in popularity and market capitalisation, their prices are extremely volatile and subject to speculative bubbles. This makes them a risky investment, especially for large companies with significant amounts of capital at stake.

The speculative nature of cryptocurrencies can be attributed to several factors:

• Investor Attention and Sentiment: The price of cryptocurrencies is heavily influenced by investor sentiment and market psychology. News, social media trends, and celebrity endorsements can drive up prices as more people buy into the hype. Similarly, negative news or fear of missing out (FOMO) can lead to panic selling and price crashes.
• Media and Social Media Influence: Cryptocurrencies are often promoted and discussed extensively on social media platforms and in the news. This constant media coverage can fuel speculation and influence investor behaviour.
• Limited Regulatory Oversight: Cryptocurrencies are not widely regulated by governments or financial institutions. This lack of regulatory oversight can lead to price manipulation and increased speculation.
• High Volatility: The value of cryptocurrencies can fluctuate drastically in a short period. This volatility is often fuelled by speculation and can make cryptocurrencies a risky investment for large companies.
• Limited Adoption: Cryptocurrencies are yet to gain widespread adoption as a medium of exchange. Their value is largely speculative, based on the expectation of future adoption and usage.
• Technological Factors: The underlying technology of cryptocurrencies, such as blockchain, is still evolving. This can lead to uncertainty and speculation about the future of cryptocurrencies.

While the speculative nature of cryptocurrencies poses risks, it also offers potential opportunities. Some companies view cryptocurrencies as a way to diversify their portfolios and hedge against inflation. Additionally, the high growth potential and liquidity of the cryptocurrency market attract investors. However, the speculative nature of this emerging market needs to be carefully considered by large companies before making significant investments.

Lack of understanding of blockchain technology

A simple Google search reveals a plethora of reasons why big businesses are hesitant to enter the cryptocurrency market, and one of the key factors is a lack of understanding of blockchain technology. Blockchain is a relatively new and complex concept, and its decentralised nature goes against traditional business models and practices.

At its core, blockchain is a digital ledger system that allows for secure, transparent, and tamper-proof transactions. It is a peer-to-peer system, removing the need for middlemen and central authorities. For businesses, this technology can revolutionise supply chain management, smart contracts, and secure data sharing. However, the very nature of blockchain also presents a threat to traditional business structures, as it removes the need for central control and can disrupt existing processes.

The decentralised aspect of blockchain technology is often misunderstood and can be seen as a threat to established businesses. The lack of central control and the distributed nature of blockchain ledgers can seem like a recipe for anarchy to those unfamiliar with the technology. In reality, blockchain provides a secure and transparent way to conduct business, but it does require a shift in mindset and a willingness to adapt to a new model.

Another concern for businesses is the regulatory uncertainty surrounding blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The legal and tax implications are still being understood and defined by governments and regulatory bodies. This lack of clarity makes it difficult for businesses to plan and strategise, especially for those operating in multiple jurisdictions. The volatile nature of cryptocurrency values also presents a challenge. The rapid fluctuations in value can make it difficult for businesses to price their goods and services, and the lack of widespread acceptance means that it is not yet a viable option for most mainstream companies.

To address these concerns, businesses need education and time. They need to understand the benefits and drawbacks of blockchain technology and how it can be applied to their specific industry. This may involve investing in research and development, as well as trialling private blockchains to understand the technology's potential. As blockchain gains more mainstream attention and its benefits become clearer, we may see a shift in corporate mindset, leading to wider acceptance and adoption.

In summary, the lack of understanding of blockchain technology is a significant hurdle for the widespread adoption of cryptocurrency by large businesses. It requires a paradigm shift in thinking and a move away from traditional centralised models. With time, education, and regulatory clarity, businesses may become more comfortable with this innovative technology and its potential to revolutionise global commerce.

Frequently asked questions