Etfs: The Future Of Passive Investing?

Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are a popular investment vehicle that offers investors diversified exposure to various asset classes, sectors, and markets. When it comes to passive investing, ETFs are a common tool used to implement this strategy. Passive ETFs aim to replicate the performance of a specific index or benchmark, such as the S&P 500 or Nasdaq, by holding the same assets as the index. This passive approach involves limited transactions and a long-term buy-and-hold strategy, aiming to mirror the index's performance rather than outperform it. Passive ETFs are known for their low costs, transparency, and tax efficiency compared to actively managed funds, making them an attractive option for investors seeking a simple, low-cost way to gain diversified exposure to the market.

Passive ETFs vs Active ETFs

Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have become an increasingly popular investment vehicle since their introduction in the 1990s. They provide investors with access to a diversified portfolio of securities across various markets, sectors, and asset classes. ETFs can be categorised as either passive or active. While both types of ETFs have similarities, there are also some key differences that investors should understand when making investment decisions.

Passive ETFs are designed to track a specific index, such as the S&P 500 or Nasdaq, and aim to replicate the performance of that index. The fund manager of a passive ETF does not make active allocation decisions but instead focuses on holding securities that mirror the chosen index. This approach results in lower costs and greater transparency compared to active ETFs. Passive ETFs are often favoured by investors who prefer a long-term, buy-and-hold strategy and do not seek to outperform the market.

On the other hand, Active ETFs involve a fund manager who actively selects and manages the ETF's portfolio of securities. The goal of active ETFs is to outperform a benchmark index rather than simply replicate its performance. Active ETFs provide the potential for higher returns but also come with higher management fees and expenses. The performance of active ETFs depends on the skill and expertise of the fund manager in making investment decisions. This type of ETF may be more suitable for investors seeking returns above the broad market and other indexes.

While passive ETFs tend to have lower fees, active ETFs offer more flexibility in terms of stock selection and the ability to adapt to market conditions. Passive ETFs are generally considered less risky due to their passive nature, whereas active ETFs rely on the fund manager's decisions and expertise.

In summary, the choice between passive and active ETFs depends on an investor's goals, risk tolerance, and investment style. Passive ETFs offer a simple, low-cost way to gain diversified exposure to a particular index, while active ETFs aim to beat the market but come with higher fees and potential risks.

Benefits of passive investing

Passive investing is a long-term, buy-and-hold strategy that aims to track the performance of a market index. It is a popular approach for investors seeking a convenient, low-cost way to implement passive investment management. Here are some benefits of passive investing:

Lower Costs and Fees

Passive investing typically involves lower management fees compared to active investing. Passive funds are often operated automatically, eliminating the need for a fund manager, which significantly reduces their running costs. Passive ETFs, for example, have lower expense ratios than actively managed funds, resulting in lower costs for investors.

Instant Diversification

Passive investing provides instant diversification for an investment portfolio. Through passive funds or ETFs, investors gain exposure to a wide range of assets, sectors, or markets in a single transaction. This diversification is challenging to achieve through stock-picking, where investors select individual stocks they believe will outperform the market.

Transparency

Passive funds and ETFs provide greater transparency than active alternatives. Passive ETF providers regularly disclose fund weightings, allowing investors to identify duplicate investments and limit strategy drift. This transparency helps investors make more informed decisions and manage their portfolios effectively.

Tax Efficiency

Passive investments generally have lower turnover, resulting in fewer transaction costs and realized capital gains. This tax efficiency can lead to significant savings for investors when filing taxes.

Long-Term Performance

While active investing aims to beat the market, passive investing seeks to match the market's performance over the long term. Passive investing advocates believe that consistently outperforming the market is challenging, and therefore, focus on replicating its returns. Historical data shows that most actively managed funds fail to beat their benchmarks or passive ETF counterparts, especially over extended periods.

Risks of passive investing

Passive investing is a popular strategy, particularly for investors who prefer a long-term, buy-and-hold approach. However, there are several risks associated with passive investing in exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

Firstly, passive ETFs are subject to total market risk. When the overall stock market or bond prices fall, passive ETFs that track a designated index will also decline in value since they mirror the holdings of that index. This lack of flexibility means that passive ETF providers cannot make defensive changes to portfolios to protect against losses during a market downturn.

Secondly, passive ETFs generally lack the flexibility to adapt to changing market conditions. The hands-off approach means that passive ETF providers cannot make dynamic investment decisions or adopt strategies to mitigate risks. Critics argue that this can be detrimental, especially during bear markets, as passive funds are forced to absorb the full impact of negative market movements.

Thirdly, passive ETFs often track capitalization-weighted indices, which means that larger stocks with higher market capitalisation are given a higher weight in the investment portfolio. This approach can reduce diversification and leave passive ETFs heavily weighted towards large-cap stocks.

Another risk to consider is liquidity risk, where there may be thin trading in an ETF, making it challenging to sell your holdings when desired.

Finally, passive ETFs may underperform active ETFs in certain market conditions. While passive ETFs aim to replicate the performance of a specific index, they do not provide any opportunity for outperformance. Active ETFs, on the other hand, utilise a portfolio manager's investment strategy and have the potential to deliver above-average returns.

In summary, while passive investing in ETFs offers benefits such as lower costs and increased transparency, it is important to be aware of the risks involved, including market risk, lack of flexibility, reduced diversification, liquidity risk, and the potential for underperformance relative to active ETFs.

Passive ETFs and transparency

Passive ETFs are a type of financial instrument that seeks to replicate the performance of a designated index by holding the assets listed on the index. They are subject to total market risk and lack flexibility. They are also heavily weighted towards the highest-valued stocks in terms of market cap.

Passive ETFs are often compared with active ETFs, which are managed by a fund manager who can adapt the fund to changing market conditions. Active ETFs can alter sector rotation, make market-timing trades, and engage in short selling or buying on margin. However, passive ETFs are more transparent than their actively managed counterparts. Passive ETF providers publish fund weightings daily, allowing investors to limit strategy drift and identify duplicate investments.

The popularity of passive ETFs has grown since their introduction in 1993, with influential figures such as Warren Buffett endorsing passive investing vehicles. In August 2019, passive ETFs and mutual funds surpassed their active counterparts in assets under management (AUM). This shift can be attributed to the low returns posted by actively managed funds and the lower costs associated with passive investing.

Passive ETFs offer several benefits, including lower expense ratios, increased transparency, and greater tax efficiency. They are also a way to achieve instant diversification for an investment portfolio, as they provide exposure to a broad range of shares, sectors, or geographic regions in a single trade. However, one of the drawbacks of passive ETFs is their lack of flexibility. Providers of these vehicles cannot make changes to portfolios or adopt defensive measures during a market downturn.

In terms of transparency, passive ETFs are subject to regulations that require disclosure of certain information. For example, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has mandated that mutual fund asset management companies (AMCs) disclose the tracking error and tracking difference of their ETFs. The tracking error refers to the difference between the expected and actual returns of an ETF, while the tracking difference is the variation in annualised daily returns between the underlying index and the net asset value (NAV) of the ETF.

Passive ETFs and management fees

Passive ETFs are a type of exchange-traded fund (ETF) that mirrors the performance of a designated market index. They are called "passive" because they are not actively managed by a fund manager, but instead, follow the underlying index or sector. Passive ETFs have become increasingly popular due to their lower fees, increased transparency, and greater tax efficiency when compared to actively managed funds.

Management Fees for Passive ETFs

Passive ETFs typically have lower management fees than actively managed funds. This is because passive funds do not require a fund manager to actively select stocks and other securities for the portfolio. Instead, they simply mirror the holdings of a designated index, which reduces the need for expensive research departments and high levels of trading that come with active fund management.

The management fees for passive ETFs cover expenses such as manager salaries, custodial services, and marketing costs. These fees are included in the total management expense ratio (MER) of the fund. The MER for passive funds is generally lower than that of active funds.

According to Morningstar, the average asset-weighted expense ratio for passively managed funds was around 0.37% in 2022. This means that investors can expect to pay around $3.70 for management costs for every $1,000 of investment value. It's important to note that brokerage houses may also charge a commission for ETF trades, typically around $20 per trade.

While passive ETFs have lower management fees than actively managed funds, it's important to consider other costs that may be associated with them. For example, if an investor deposits small amounts of capital regularly into a passive ETF, brokerage fees can become a significant expense over time. Additionally, passive ETFs may not offer the same level of protection from market volatility as actively managed funds, as they are subject to total market risk and lack the flexibility to adapt to changing market conditions.

Frequently asked questions