Private Equity Firms: Public Securities Investment Strategies

Private equity firms are investment partnerships that buy and manage companies before selling them. They are typically not open to small investors and are instead funded by institutional investors and very wealthy individuals. Private equity funds often focus on long-term investments, and their investment time horizon is typically 10 or more years. They usually do not hold stakes in companies that remain listed on a stock exchange.

Public equity, on the other hand, refers to equity in publicly traded companies, which are available to anyone with an investment account.

This raises the question: do private equity firms invest in public securities?

Private equity firms' interest in public companies

Private equity firms are interested in public companies for a variety of reasons. Firstly, they can acquire undervalued or under-managed public companies, restructure them, and resell them at a profit. Private equity firms aim to increase the value of these companies through various means, such as cost-cutting, restructuring, or improving operations. They typically take a controlling interest in the company and actively manage it to maximize returns.

Another reason for private equity firms' interest in public companies is the potential for higher returns compared to public equity investments. Private equity investments have historically generated higher returns than stocks, although they come with higher risk, fees, and lower liquidity. Private equity firms often focus on long-term investments, with investment horizons of 10 years or more, and seek to add value to the companies they acquire before exiting through a sale or initial public offering (IPO).

Additionally, private equity firms may be attracted to public companies that operate in industries with high barriers to entry, generate consistent profits, have strong market positions, or are underperforming relative to their peers. By acquiring such companies, private equity firms can implement operational improvements and strategic changes to increase their value.

It is worth noting that private equity firms typically do not hold stakes in companies that remain listed on a stock exchange. They may acquire public companies and take them private through leveraged buyouts or other means. Overall, private equity firms' interest in public companies stems from the opportunity to generate higher returns by acquiring, restructuring, and reselling undervalued or under-managed businesses.

The role of private equity in the healthcare industry

Private equity plays a significant and growing role in the financing of healthcare in the United States. Private equity firms have long been active in hospital, nursing home, and home care settings, but recently, acquisitions of physician practices have skyrocketed, especially in high-margin specialties like dermatology, urology, gastroenterology, and cardiology.

Private equity firms prioritize short-term profits, typically moving on from their health care investments within three to seven years. While their involvement in health care may improve operational or technological efficiencies, there are concerns about the effects on cost, quality, and utilization of care. Research has found that private equity involvement in health care has led to changes in the workforce, increased costs and utilization, mixed effects on quality of care, and a lower percentage of Medicare patient discharges, implying an increase in privately insured patients with higher reimbursement rates.

Private equity's common business model of buying, growing through acquisition or "roll-up", and selling for above-average returns has caused concern. Their focus on short-term profits over patients' health can lead to aggressive cost management and heavy debt loads for companies, which can result in neglect of vital but non-revenue-generating aspects of an investment and overconsolidation.

However, private equity also brings innovation to healthcare through new delivery models, technologies, and operational efficiencies. It is an important source of capital for many healthcare entities, and some private equity firms have begun offering equity to workers of the companies they acquire.

Private equity funds' long-term investment opportunities

Private equity funds are known for their long-term investment horizons, typically exceeding 10 years. This long-term focus allows them to pursue strategic opportunities that may take time to bear fruit.

One of the key strategies employed by private equity funds is to acquire controlling interests in portfolio companies and actively manage and direct their operations to increase their value. This approach, often termed "buying to sell," involves seeking out undervalued or under-managed companies, making improvements, and then selling them for a maximum return. By contrast, public companies often follow a "buying to keep" strategy, diluting their returns by holding onto businesses even after the growth in value tapers off.

Private equity funds can also invest in startups or fast-growing companies, taking a minority position and acting as silent partners. This approach allows them to benefit from the high growth potential of these companies while mitigating the risk associated with controlling interests.

The long-term horizon of private equity funds provides several advantages. Firstly, it enables them to focus on long-term prospects without the public pressure for short-term results. This freedom allows them to implement strategic changes, such as cost-cutting measures, operational improvements, and management restructuring, which may take time to show results.

Additionally, the long-term nature of private equity investments attracts a certain type of investor. Private equity funds are typically open only to accredited investors and qualified clients, including institutional investors and high-net-worth individuals. These investors understand that private equity investments are often illiquid and require a long-term commitment.

Furthermore, the long-term horizon allows private equity funds to align their interests with those of the portfolio companies. By working closely with company executives, private equity firms can make strategic decisions that may not provide immediate returns but aim to increase the company's value over time.

Overall, the long-term investment opportunities offered by private equity funds provide a unique approach to generating higher returns. By focusing on the long-term potential of their portfolio companies, private equity funds can create value through operational improvements, efficient management of resources, and strategic restructuring.

Private equity firms' use of debt

Private equity firms use debt to finance their acquisitions. This is known as a leveraged buyout. The use of debt in this way amplifies a private equity firm's expected returns on its investments. This is because the US government allows interest payments on debt to be tax-deductible.

Private equity firms typically borrow up to 2-4 times the EBITDA (net profits) of a business. This number can be even higher. For example, in the 1980s, deals were frequently consummated at 90% debt-to-enterprise value ratios. In the 1990s, this fell to around 70%. Now, typical leverage ratios are in the 50-60% range.

Private equity firms are able to use debt in this way because they are investing money from outside investors. This means they can take on greater risk than if they were investing their own money.

The use of debt in private equity deals can have a significant impact on the risk of rollover equity and the ability of the company to finance future growth. It can also affect the equity returns of the owners of the company being acquired.

Critics of private equity firms argue that they weigh down acquired companies with substantial debt. This can lead to neglect in vital but non-revenue-generating aspects of the investment and overconsolidation. It can also result in aggressive cost management, layoffs, and furloughs for employees.

Private equity funds' conflicts of interest

Private equity funds conflicts of interest refer to situations where private equity firms pursue self-serving agendas at the expense of other stakeholders, including investors and acquired companies. Here are some paragraphs discussing this issue in detail:

Private equity funds are known to have conflicts of interest due to their complex structure and multiple stakeholders. The funds' managers, typically private equity firms, act as general partners and make all investment decisions. They contribute a small percentage of the fund's capital while raising the rest from investors, known as limited partners. This dynamic can create a conflict between the interests of the fund managers and the limited partners. Fund managers may focus on generating high returns in the short term to maximise their profits, even if it means taking on excessive risks or adopting strategies that may not be in the best long-term interests of the investors.

Another conflict of interest arises when private equity firms acquire a portfolio company. The private equity firm's primary goal is to increase the company's value to sell it at a profit later. This objective may lead to conflicts with the acquired company's management and employees. Private equity firms are known for their aggressive cost-cutting measures, operational changes, and job layoffs to boost efficiency and profitability. Such actions can negatively impact the company's long-term health and the well-being of its employees, even if they generate short-term gains.

Additionally, private equity firms often use significant amounts of debt to finance their acquisitions, known as leveraged buyouts. This strategy can burden the acquired company with unsustainable debt levels. The interests of the private equity firm and the company may diverge in such cases, as the former seeks to maximise its returns, while the latter struggles under the weight of debt. This conflict can lead to the company's decline or even bankruptcy if debt levels become unmanageable.

Furthermore, private equity funds are not subject to the same level of regulatory scrutiny as public companies. While they are exempt from certain regulations, private equity firms are still subject to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and anti-fraud provisions of federal securities laws. The lack of stringent regulation can create a conflict of interest as private equity firms operate with more flexibility and less oversight than public companies, potentially leading to unethical or harmful practices without sufficient accountability.

Lastly, conflicts of interest can arise when private equity firms sell or exit their investments. The firms aim to generate high returns for themselves and their investors through initial public offerings (IPOs) or sales to other investors. However, this can create a conflict with the acquired company's long-term interests, as private equity firms may focus on short-term gains rather than sustainable growth. Additionally, the sale of a portfolio company may dilute the ownership stakes of existing shareholders, further exacerbating the conflict between the private equity firm and the company's stakeholders.

Frequently asked questions