Private Equity: Nursing Homes' Savior Or Villain?

Private equity firms have been making headlines by buying nursing homes, altering their operations for higher profits, and then selling the businesses for a higher price. In 2022, it was estimated that 5% of nursing homes enrolled in Medicare were owned by private equity investors. This has raised concerns about the quality of care and transparency in the industry, especially as the data on nursing home ownership is often incomplete or difficult to access, making it challenging to identify private equity ownership accurately.

Private equity investment in nursing homes has been associated with an increase in patient mortality rates

The study analyzed Medicare and Medicaid data covering more than 18,000 US nursing homes between 2004 and 2019, with 1,700 of these homes purchased by private equity firms during this period. The researchers found that the increased mortality rate was concentrated among patients who were relatively healthier. They suggested that sicker patients have more regimented treatment that will be followed regardless of who owns the facility, while healthier patients may be more susceptible to changes under private equity ownership.

One factor contributing to the higher mortality rate could be staff cuts. Private equity-owned nursing homes often reduce staffing levels to cut costs, with a particular focus on reducing the hours of frontline caregivers such as clinical nursing assistants and licensed practical nurses. The study found an average reduction in staffing of 1.4% and a 3% drop in the number of hours spent providing basic services such as hygiene, infection management, and monitoring. These routine tasks are critical to the well-being and health outcomes of older patients.

Another factor could be the increased use of antipsychotic medication in private equity-owned nursing homes. The study found a 50% increase in the use of these drugs, which are known to increase mortality in older, institutionalized patients with dementia. The combination of fewer nurses and more antipsychotic medications is likely a "lethal combination" that accounts for the spike in deaths.

Private equity-owned nursing homes face different financial considerations than their for-profit and non-profit competitors. Private equity buyouts are often financed with substantial borrowing, leading to increased interest and lease payments. To generate cash for investors, private equity managers may sell the nursing facility's property and lease it back, resulting in higher lease payments. These financial pressures can lead to cost-cutting measures that negatively impact patient care and outcomes.

The higher fees associated with private equity-owned nursing homes do not translate into better care. Patients in these facilities experience a decline in mobility and increased levels of pain. The study also found that patients in private equity-owned nursing homes were 50% more likely to be placed on antipsychotic medication, which can be used to reduce staffing needs by sedating patients instead of providing behavioral therapy.

The researchers warn that the success of private equity in other sectors does not necessarily translate to healthcare. The focus on maximizing profits can lead to detrimental outcomes for patients, and regulators and decision-makers have a critical duty to address these incentives to ensure that the welfare of patients is aligned with the profit motives of owners.

Private equity ownership of nursing homes can lead to a decline in patient mobility

Private equity ownership of nursing homes has been associated with a decline in patient mobility, as well as higher patient mortality rates, fewer caregivers, and higher management fees. This can be attributed to the cost-cutting measures implemented by private equity firms to increase profits and generate cash for investors.

Private equity firms typically finance buyouts through substantial borrowing, which results in increased interest payments and lease payments for nursing homes. To cut costs, these firms reduce staffing levels, particularly among frontline caregivers such as clinical nursing assistants and licensed practical nurses. This reduction in staff directly impacts the level of care and attention that patients receive, including assistance with mobility.

Research has shown that private equity-owned nursing homes experience a 3% decline in hours worked by frontline nursing assistants, who provide crucial mobility assistance to patients. As a result, patients may not receive the necessary help with walking, transferring, or other activities that promote physical movement and independence. This decline in patient mobility can have significant physical and psychological consequences, impacting their overall well-being and quality of life.

Additionally, private equity firms often sell nursing facility properties and lease them back, resulting in increased lease payments. This further contributes to cost-cutting measures, as firms may reduce expenditures on equipment, supplies, or other resources that could enhance patient mobility, such as physical therapy or rehabilitation services.

The decline in patient mobility under private equity ownership is a concerning trend that underscores the potential negative impact of profit-driven decisions on patient care and outcomes. It highlights the need for regulatory oversight and accountability to ensure that cost-cutting measures do not compromise the quality of care and the well-being of residents in nursing homes.

Private equity firms' complex ownership structures make it difficult to trace the flow of funds within nursing homes

Private equity firms have been acquiring nursing homes and modifying their operations to increase profits. However, their complex ownership structures make it difficult to trace the flow of funds within these nursing homes.

Nursing homes can have intricate ownership structures, with one or more owners, each of which may, in turn, have one or more owners themselves. This complexity is further compounded when private equity firms are involved, as they often operate through investment funds established on behalf of institutional and accredited investors. The funds they manage are not listed on public exchanges, making it challenging to ascertain the specific ownership details.

The ownership of nursing homes by private equity firms has raised concerns among government agencies, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). CMS is responsible for ensuring that nursing homes enrolled in the Medicare program meet certain quality standards. However, identifying the ownership structure of these nursing homes is challenging due to the complex nature of private equity ownership.

The impact of private equity ownership on nursing homes is significant. Private equity-owned nursing homes face different financial considerations compared to their for-profit and non-profit competitors. They are often financed with substantial borrowing, leading to increased interest payments and lease payments. To generate cash for investors, private equity managers may sell the nursing facility's property and lease it back, resulting in higher costs.

Private equity ownership in nursing homes has been associated with higher patient mortality rates, reduced staffing levels, and increased charges for patients. The complex ownership structures of private equity firms make it difficult to trace the flow of funds within these nursing homes, raising concerns about the impact on patient care and the prioritization of profits over people's well-being.

Private equity buyouts of nursing homes often result in staff reduction and unexpected facility closures

Private equity buyouts of nursing homes have become increasingly common in recent years, with these firms acquiring long-term care facilities at an accelerated rate since 2016. This trend has raised concerns among public health officials and researchers, who have found that private equity ownership often leads to staff reduction and unexpected facility closures.

The primary goal of nursing homes is to provide quality care for vulnerable individuals. However, private equity firms are driven by profit motives, which often results in cost-cutting measures that compromise patient well-being and staffing levels. Research has shown that resident outcomes are significantly worse at private equity-owned nursing homes, with higher mortality rates and a decline in patient mobility. For example, frontline caregivers see a 3% decline in hours compared to the industry average, while registered nurses, who make up a smaller segment of the care staff, see an 8% increase. This shift in staffing allocation can have detrimental effects on the quality of care provided to residents.

Private equity firms also employ complex ownership structures, making it difficult to trace the flow of funds within nursing homes. They often separate property assets, such as real estate, into different entities and lease them back to the nursing homes at inflated rates. These excessive rent payments divert money away from resident care and into the pockets of private equity investors. Additionally, private equity firms charge substantial management fees and service contracts, further straining the financial stability of nursing homes and limiting their ability to allocate resources to resident care.

The financial pressures and cost-cutting measures imposed by private equity ownership can lead to unexpected facility closures. In some cases, once a nursing home has been burdened with excessive debt and lease payments, it may file for bankruptcy. The license to operate the facility is then sold to another group, the real estate is sold, and the previous ownership group moves on to another target. This leaves residents in jeopardy, with their care often suffering as a result.

To address these challenges, increased transparency and robust regulatory oversight are necessary. The Biden administration has taken steps in this direction by finalizing a rule requiring nursing homes to disclose their owners, trustees, and companies providing administrative, clinical, and financial services. This rule will help families make informed decisions about care and hold nursing homes accountable for the service they provide. Additionally, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has released ownership data for Medicare-certified hospitals and nursing homes, providing valuable insights into the complex world of private equity ownership in the healthcare sector.

Private equity investment in nursing homes may bring financial resources but can undermine the core mission of providing quality care

Private equity investment in nursing homes has been a growing trend over the past decade. This trend has significant implications for the financial resources and quality of care in these facilities. On the one hand, private equity firms can bring much-needed capital and business acumen to nursing homes, which can potentially improve their operations. However, the primary goal of private equity is to maximize profits, which can often come at the expense of patient care and undermine the core mission of providing quality care.

The impact of private equity investment in nursing homes has been a subject of recent studies, which have revealed concerning trends. One notable study found that patient mortality rates during a nursing home stay and the subsequent 90 days were 10% higher in private equity-owned facilities compared to skilled nursing facilities overall. Additionally, private equity-owned nursing homes were associated with fewer caregivers, higher management fees, and a decline in patient mobility. These findings suggest that cost-cutting measures implemented by private equity firms, such as reduced staffing levels, can have detrimental effects on the quality of care provided to residents.

Furthermore, private equity ownership has been linked to increased charges for services, with overall bills being more than 10% higher for patients in these facilities. The higher fees do not necessarily translate into better care, as measured by key indicators. Patients in private equity-owned nursing homes are also 50% more likely to be placed on antipsychotic medication, indicating a potential over-reliance on sedation as a cost-saving measure. Additionally, these facilities perform below average in key metrics of well-being, such as patient mobility and pain management.

The financial considerations of private equity-owned nursing homes differ significantly from their for-profit and non-profit competitors. Private equity buyouts are often financed with substantial borrowing, leading to increased interest payments and lease payments. To generate cash for investors, private equity managers may sell the nursing facility's property and lease it back, further increasing costs. These financial pressures can result in cost-cutting measures that directly impact patient care, such as reduced staffing levels and decreased investment in necessary resources, such as personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic.

While private equity investment in nursing homes can bring financial resources, it is crucial to carefully consider the potential impact on the quality of care. The core mission of nursing homes should always be to provide the best possible care for their residents, and decisions should be made with this goal in mind. Striking a balance between financial sustainability and quality care is essential, and regulatory oversight plays a critical role in ensuring that patient well-being remains the top priority.

Frequently asked questions