Recourse Loans: Impact On Partnership Basis

When a partnership takes out a loan, the character of the liability as recourse or non-recourse affects how the loan is allocated among the partners. This, in turn, impacts the basis of the partnership. The basis of a partnership is reported annually on a K-1 form, which details each partner's share of liabilities for that year. There are three types of liabilities that are allocated: non-recourse, qualified non-recourse financing, and recourse. Non-recourse liabilities are those for which no partner bears the economic risk of loss. In contrast, recourse liabilities are those for which a partner bears the economic risk of loss. If a partnership has recourse liabilities that become non-recourse liabilities, the partners' bases in their partnership interests may change.

Allocation of recourse debt in LLCs

Allocating liabilities in an LLC is generally straightforward. Because LLC members are not personally responsible for the liabilities of the partnership, all LLC liabilities are generally nonrecourse. However, this changes when an LLC member enters into a Deficit Restoration Obligation (DRO) or personally guarantees the debt.

Under Regs. Sec. 1.752-2(a), LLC members share recourse liabilities in the same proportions in which they bear the economic risk of loss with respect to the liability. In other words, members are allocated basis from recourse debt to reflect the way they would be legally obligated to bear the burden of discharging the liability if the LLC were unable to do so.

For example, assume G and H form GH, LLC, and share all profits and losses 60/40. G has personally guaranteed all LLC liabilities. G contributes $60 to the LLC, and H contributes $40. The LLC uses the $100 of cash, borrows another $100 on a recourse basis, and buys a building for $200. In this case, the $100 recourse liability would be allocated $60 to G and $40 to H, because each partner is required to pay their respective amounts to the lender in satisfaction of the loan.

It is important to note that limited partners, whether in a limited partnership or an LLC, are generally not allocated any portion of a recourse debt because they have no personal liability for the debts of the partnership under state law. However, if a limited partner personally guarantees the debt with no right to reimbursement, that portion of the debt will be treated as recourse.

To properly determine the members' economic risk of loss, the practitioner should review the LLC's articles of organization, the operating agreement, and the appropriate state LLC statute. Members with a deficit restoration obligation may, in certain situations, be allocated a share of LLC recourse debt.

Risk of loss analysis

A risk of loss analysis is a crucial aspect of understanding the impact of recourse loans on a partnership basis. This analysis helps determine the economic risk of loss among partners in the event of partnership liabilities or liquidation.

When a partnership incurs liabilities, it is essential to allocate these obligations among the partners to understand their individual economic risk of loss. This allocation is particularly important for tax purposes and debt repayment strategies.

In a partnership, the allocation of liabilities can vary depending on the type of partnership and the specific agreements in place. For example, in a limited partnership, limited partners are generally shielded from personal liability for partnership debts unless they enter into a Deficit Restoration Obligation (DRO) or personally guarantee the debt. On the other hand, general partners typically bear personal liability for partnership debts.

Recourse loans further complicate the risk of loss analysis. A recourse loan is when a partner personally guarantees a loan or when the loan is made directly by a partner. In this case, the partner becomes personally responsible for repaying the loan if the partnership defaults. This scenario significantly impacts the risk of loss analysis as the partner who took out the loan or guaranteed it is now personally liable.

To conduct a comprehensive risk of loss analysis, one must consider the partnership agreement, the type of partnership, state laws, and the specific loan agreements. By analyzing these factors, it is possible to allocate liabilities among the partners and determine their individual economic risk of loss. This analysis ensures that each partner understands their potential financial exposure in the event of partnership liabilities or dissolution.

Non-recourse loans

In the context of partnerships, non-recourse liabilities must be allocated to each partner according to their share of the "partnership minimum gain." This applies if the partnership owns depreciable property secured by the non-recourse loan. If a partner personally guarantees a portion of the debt, that portion will be treated as recourse and allocated to that partner.

It is important to note that the treatment of non-recourse loans can vary depending on the state and the type of partnership. For example, in the United States, most states permit recourse for residential mortgages, but a few states require non-recourse mortgages. Additionally, limited partners in a limited partnership or an LLC are generally not allocated any portion of a recourse debt, as they are not personally liable for the debts of the partnership under state law.

Lender's rights

Lenders' rights in the context of recourse loans refer to the legal right of the lender to collect the borrower's pledged collateral if the borrower defaults on their debt obligation. This is known as "recourse". Recourse loans give lenders the right to pursue additional assets beyond the collateral if the debt's balance surpasses the collateral's value. This means that the lender can seize other assets or garnish the borrower's wages to recoup the remainder of the debt.

Recourse loans can be full or limited. Full recourse means that the lender can seize any of the borrower's assets to cover the entire amount of the outstanding loan, not just specific assets. Limited recourse debt, on the other hand, restricts the lender to claiming only the specific assets listed in the loan contract ahead of time.

Non-recourse loans, in contrast, limit the lender to claiming only the specific asset pledged as collateral. In the event of default on a non-recourse loan, the lender cannot attempt to recover the balance by seizing the borrower's other assets. The lender only has a legal right to the pledged collateral. Because of this distinction, recourse debt is considered less risky for lenders and is, therefore, the more common form of debt.

In terms of partnership liabilities, if a partner makes a loan to the partnership, they are responsible for that loan. If the partnership fails to pay, the partner loses. This is true regardless of the nature of the debt or the type of entity. However, limited partners are generally not allocated any portion of a recourse debt because they have no personal liability for the debts of the partnership under state law. There are exceptions to this, such as when a limited partner personally guarantees the debt with no right to reimbursement.

Tax implications

The tax implications of recourse loans and partnership basis are complex and depend on various factors, including the type of partnership, the jurisdiction, and the specific terms of the loan. Here is an overview of some key considerations:

Allocation of Liabilities

The allocation of liabilities among partners plays a crucial role in determining the tax consequences. In a partnership, liabilities can be classified as recourse or non-recourse. Recourse liabilities are those where one or more partners bear the economic risk of loss if the partnership defaults on its obligations. Non-recourse liabilities, on the other hand, are those where no partner is personally liable, and only the creditor bears the economic risk of loss.

Limited Partnerships

In a limited partnership, limited partners are generally not allocated any portion of a recourse debt because they are not personally liable for the partnership's debts under state law. However, if a limited partner personally guarantees the debt without the right to reimbursement, that portion of the debt will be treated as recourse and allocated to them.

General Partnerships

In contrast to limited partnerships, general partners in a general partnership are personally liable for the partnership's debts. Therefore, any recourse liabilities would typically be allocated to the general partners based on their share of the partnership.

Basis Adjustments

Recourse loans can impact the basis of partners in a partnership. If a partnership has recourse liabilities that convert into non-recourse liabilities, the sharing ratios change, and the partners' bases must be adjusted accordingly. If a decrease in a partner's share of liabilities exceeds their basis, they may need to recognize a gain on the excess amount.

Tax Treatment of Losses

Recourse liabilities are essential in calculating a partner's basis for deducting partnership losses. Partners can use their share of recourse liabilities to offset taxable income or claim tax deductions, depending on the specific tax regulations in their jurisdiction.

Interest Rates and Costs

Recourse loans typically have lower interest rates than non-recourse loans. However, in the event of default, lenders of recourse loans may pursue additional assets beyond the collateral to recoup their losses. This increased risk may result in higher overall costs for borrowers who opt for recourse loans.

In summary, the tax implications of recourse loans in a partnership context depend on the allocation of liabilities, the type of partnership, basis adjustments, the treatment of losses, and the interest rates and potential costs associated with the loans. It is important to consult with a tax professional or accountant to understand the specific tax consequences based on your partnership structure and loan agreements.

Frequently asked questions