Mortgage-Backed Securities: Catalyst Of The Financial Crisis

The 2007-2008 financial crisis was the worst recession since the 1930s. It was caused by a combination of factors, including the collapse of the US housing market bubble, risky lending practices, and the securitization of mortgages. Mortgage-backed securities (MBS) are financial products that pool together many mortgages and are then sold to investors. MBS contributed to the financial crisis by exposing a large number of financial institutions to risky mortgages. When borrowers began to default on their mortgages, the value of MBS fell, causing significant losses for banks and investors and triggering a wider financial crisis.

Securitization of bad loans

Securitization, specifically the packaging of mortgage debt into bond-like financial instruments, was a key driver of the 2007-08 global financial crisis. Securitization involves the packaging of products, in this case, mortgages, into a financial asset that is similar to a bond, for investors to purchase and receive an income stream from the mortgage payments. Securitization of mortgage debt in bond-like investments such as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations was a significant cause of the financial crisis.

The securitization of mortgages into asset-backed securities fueled risk-taking and eventually brought Wall Street to its knees when the U.S. real estate bubble burst. The securitization of home mortgages fueled excessive risk-taking throughout the financial sector, from mortgage originators to Wall Street banks. When U.S. housing prices began to fall, mortgage delinquencies soared, leaving Wall Street banks with enormous losses on their mortgage-backed securities. The housing market was in free fall, and the banks holding mortgage-backed securities were in trouble, scrambling to get rid of them as their value plummeted.

The securitization process resulted in banks taking on excessive risk and passing that risk onto investors. Securitization allows for more credit to be available in the economy, meaning banks can lend more. When banks make loans, there are only so many loans they can make that are supported by their balance sheet. Banks and other lenders who issued mortgages to homebuyers then sold those mortgages to bigger banks for repackaging into mortgage-backed securities and CDOs. Over time, because lenders issuing the loans passed them along to big banks for securitization, they were no longer at risk if the homeowner defaulted. So lending standards fell dramatically. This meant that many unqualified or under-qualified borrowers—known as subprime borrowers—were able to secure risky loans.

The securitizations owned the subprime mortgage loans that eventually defaulted and caused a banking crisis. The number of loans originated in the 2000-2006 period was unusually large because of a real estate bubble in the United States. The banks that held these securitizations as investments lost tens of billions of dollars, almost causing the U.S. banking system to collapse.

Faulty risk ratings

The financial crisis of 2007-2008 was a result of several factors, but one of the most widely accepted reasons is the securitization of bad loans that were then rated AAA and sold to investors. The process of securitization involves pooling together financial products, in this case, mortgages, and packaging them into financial assets that resemble bonds. These are then sold to investors who receive an income stream from the mortgage payments.

The fault, in this case, lies with the rating agencies that improperly rated mortgage-backed securities as AAA, the highest rating a financial product can receive. This gave investors a false sense of security, as they believed these securities to be safe investments. The reality, however, was that these securities were backed by subprime mortgages, given to borrowers who were unqualified or under-qualified, also known as weak borrowers. The high number of defaults on these mortgages led to a decrease in the value of the securities, which in turn eroded the net worth and financial health of banks.

The question arises as to why these securities were rated so highly. One reason could be the complex nature of these securities, which made it difficult to assess their true value. The derived securities were hard to value, and even more so for the securities derived from tranches of derived securities. This uncertainty about the value of the securities, coupled with the large number of financial institutions holding them, meant that a significant number of balance sheets were affected by this uncertainty.

Additionally, the bundling of these mortgages was believed to reduce investors' risk, as the risk was spread across a large number of mortgages. This belief was further reinforced by the stellar ratings assigned by credit rating firms. As a result, investors were willing to use these securities as leverage to control much larger sums of money than the face value of the underlying assets.

The performance of these securities has since been re-evaluated, with some arguing that they were not as bad as initially assumed. While the losses from these securities were not insignificant, they were also not large enough to solely cause the financial crisis. Further research and updated data are needed to fully understand the impact of these securities on the crisis.

Excessive risk-taking

The securitization of mortgages into bond-like financial instruments, such as mortgage-backed securities (MBS), was a significant driver of the 2007-2008 global financial crisis. Securitization fuelled excessive risk-taking, which ultimately brought many major financial institutions to their knees when the US real estate bubble burst.

Mortgage-backed securities were introduced after the Housing and Urban Development Act in 1968. Banks provided mortgages to homebuyers, and these loans were secured by the properties being purchased. Banks and other lenders then sold these mortgages to larger banks, which repackaged them into mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). The larger banks were then no longer at risk if the homeowner defaulted, so lending standards dropped, and many underqualified borrowers—known as subprime borrowers—were able to secure risky loans.

The subprime mortgages in MBS and CDOs were attractive to big investors because they generated higher returns due to the higher interest rates subprime borrowers paid. The bundling of these mortgages was also believed to reduce investors' risk, and the assets consistently received high ratings from credit rating firms. As a result, the assets were used as leverage to control trillions of dollars—many times the face value of the underlying assets.

However, when the housing market faltered, the value of MBS plummeted, leading to significant financial losses. This misjudgment of risk, combined with excessive reliance on credit and financial engineering, created the conditions for the eventual collapse. The financial crisis was in full swing, with banks scrambling to get rid of their mortgage-backed securities as their value plummeted.

Housing bubble collapse

The housing bubble collapse, which occurred between 2007 and 2010, was a significant contributor to the financial crisis. It was characterised by a sharp decline in housing prices, which triggered a chain reaction of adverse events. As housing prices decreased, borrowers faced challenges in making mortgage payments, leading to an increase in default rates. This resulted in mass foreclosures, further driving down housing prices and eroding the financial stability of banks, as the value of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) declined.

The collapse of the housing bubble was closely linked to the proliferation of subprime lending. Subprime lending contributed to a surge in homeownership rates and heightened demand for housing, driving up prices. However, many borrowers relied on adjustable-rate mortgages with initial grace periods, expecting to refinance after a year or two of appreciation. As housing prices depreciated, refinancing became more challenging, and borrowers struggled to keep up with higher monthly payments.

The securitisation of mortgages, particularly the packaging of loans into MBS and collateralised debt obligations (CDOs), played a pivotal role in the housing bubble collapse. Securitisation fuelled excessive risk-taking by financial institutions, as it allowed them to pass on the risk of default to investors. The complex nature of securitised assets made it difficult to assess their true value, and they were often incorrectly rated by credit rating agencies, giving investors a false sense of security.

As the financial crisis unfolded, the value of MBS plummeted, causing significant losses for banks and investors. The interconnection of financial institutions, both within and across countries, amplified the impact, as the uncertainty and losses affected a large number of balance sheets. The decline in MBS values, coupled with decreasing housing prices, contributed to a downward spiral that severely impacted the global economy.

While there were multiple factors at play, the housing bubble collapse, fuelled by subprime lending and securitisation practices, was a critical component of the financial crisis. The interplay between risky lending, complex financial instruments, and declining housing prices created a perfect storm that led to widespread economic instability and the severe recession that followed.

Subprime lending

The subprime lending crisis was a key factor in the 2007-2009 financial crisis. Subprime lending refers to loans made to high-risk borrowers with poor credit histories, low income, or small down payments. In the early to mid-2000s, a combination of factors led to a significant increase in subprime lending.

Firstly, the US government implemented policies aimed at expanding homeownership, which resulted in a surge in demand for housing. This was further exacerbated by speculation from many home buyers, who were taking advantage of the booming economy and low-interest rates.

Secondly, lenders offered more loans to these high-risk borrowers, fuelled by the increased availability of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). MBS and CDOs are financial products that pool together and repackage mortgages as securities to be sold to investors. The use of MBS and CDOs allowed lenders to pass on the risk of default to investors, reducing their exposure. As a result, lending standards dropped, and subprime borrowers who would not have qualified for traditional mortgages were able to secure risky loans.

Additionally, credit agencies and rating firms were overly optimistic about these non-traditional loans, assigning them coveted AAA ratings. These ratings gave investors a false sense of security, leading them to believe that these securities were safe investments.

As the housing market peaked, refinancing and selling homes became less viable for borrowers to settle their mortgage debts. When a large number of borrowers began defaulting on their loans, it triggered a wave of foreclosures. This, in turn, caused a downward spiral in house prices, which further increased mortgage loss rates for lenders and investors.

The collapse of the housing market and the failure of financial institutions like Lehman Brothers led to a credit crunch and a severe global recession. The shockwaves of the subprime lending crisis rippled through the financial system, contributing significantly to the 2007-2009 financial crisis.

Frequently asked questions