Mortgages: Put Option-Like Security For Homeowners

A put option is a financial contract that gives the buyer the right to sell an asset at a specific price by a specific date. While mortgages are not option contracts, they took on the characteristics of options contracts during the Great Housing Bubble. Homeowners who viewed their mortgages as put options could exercise their put option and sell their homes back to the lender at a strike price, avoiding the cost of using a realtor. This is similar to how a put option allows the holder to sell an underlying security at a set price.

Put options as insurance for the buyer

Put options can function like a form of insurance for the buyer. A put option is a financial contract that gives the buyer the right to sell an asset at a specific price by a specific date. The buyer pays the seller a pre-established fee per share (a "premium") to purchase the contract. This premium acts as a form of insurance for the buyer. If the stock price falls, the buyer can still sell the shares at the higher strike price instead of the lower market price, thus offsetting the risk of loss. This is known as a "protective put".

For example, if an investor buys a put option for a stock currently trading at $50 per share, with a strike price of $50 and an expiration date of six months, they have the right to sell the stock at $50 per share within those six months. If the stock price falls to $40 during that time, the put option allows the investor to sell at $50, protecting them from a $10 loss per share.

Put options are often used in a risk management strategy called a protective put, where the investor buys a put option to hedge downside risk in a stock held in their portfolio. This ensures that losses in the underlying asset do not exceed the strike price. If the option is exercised, the investor sells the stock at the put's strike price, limiting their potential loss.

In the context of mortgages, some people have viewed their mortgage contracts as having "put" options. During the Great Housing Bubble, some homeowners exercised their "put" option, allowing them to put their property back to the bank at a higher price than the purchase price. This resulted in a profit for the homeowner, similar to the protective put strategy in stock trading. However, it is important to note that mortgage contracts in the US are not technically options contracts, and the "put" option is not explicitly stated in the contract.

Speculators' views on mortgages

Speculators view mortgages as a type of "put" option. A put option is a financial contract that gives the buyer the right (but not the obligation) to sell an asset at a specific price by a specific date. The seller sets the terms of the contract, including the fee per share (or "premium") that the buyer pays to purchase the contract. Each contract typically represents 100 shares of the underlying stock. Importantly, investors don't need to own the underlying stock to buy or sell a put option.

In the context of mortgages, the "put" option allows the homeowner (the buyer) to sell their house (the underlying asset) to the bank (the seller) at a specified price (the "strike price") by a certain date. This is similar to a mortgage in that the homeowner has the right to sell their house to the bank in exchange for paying off the remaining mortgage balance.

From a speculator's perspective, mortgages can be viewed as a type of put option because they provide a way to limit potential losses on a home purchase. For example, if a homeowner buys a house with a mortgage and the value of the house decreases, they can still sell the house to the bank at the strike price specified in the mortgage contract. This limits their loss to the down payment and any other fees or interest paid on the mortgage.

Additionally, speculators may view mortgages as a form of insurance or hedge against the risk of loss from a decline in the value of the home. By obtaining a mortgage, the homeowner effectively locks in a sale price for the home, regardless of future market fluctuations. This can be particularly attractive in a declining housing market, as it provides a floor for the homeowner's investment.

However, it is important to note that mortgages are not technically option contracts, and lenders do not typically view them as such. The comparison between mortgages and put options is primarily from the perspective of speculators and homeowners, who may see the mortgage as a way to manage their risk and limit potential losses on their home purchase.

The 'optionality' of a mortgage contract

The optionality of a mortgage contract refers to the idea that mortgages have characteristics similar to those of put options. A put option is a financial contract that gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to sell an asset (usually a security) at a specific price (strike price) by a specific date. This means that if the price of the asset falls, the buyer can choose to sell it at the higher strike price, limiting their losses. Similarly, a mortgage contract gives the borrower the right, but not the obligation, to buy a house with a loan from a lender. If the value of the house falls, the borrower can choose to walk away and default on the loan, effectively "putting" the house back to the lender, as seen during the Great Housing Bubble.

The optionality of a mortgage contract can be seen as a form of insurance for the borrower. Just as a put option protects the buyer from falling asset prices, a mortgage contract protects the borrower from negative equity. If the value of the house falls below the loan amount, the borrower can choose to default and return the house to the lender, limiting their losses to the down payment and any fees incurred. This is similar to how a put option allows the buyer to sell an asset at a higher strike price if its market price falls.

However, it is important to note that mortgage contracts are not technically option contracts. While they may exhibit some similar characteristics, there are key differences. Mortgage contracts do not explicitly include "put" or "call" options, and lenders do not typically view themselves as selling option premiums. Nevertheless, borrowers and speculators may treat mortgages as options, using them for hedging or speculative purposes.

The optionality of a mortgage contract can have significant implications for lenders and the broader housing market. During the Great Housing Bubble, for example, speculators took advantage of 100% financing to walk away with profits, leaving lenders with significant losses. This resulted in a wave of ruthless defaults and negative consequences for the housing market. To mitigate these risks, lenders may need to increase the costs of mortgage credit or implement tighter guidelines and loan limits.

In conclusion, the optionality of a mortgage contract refers to the similarities between mortgage contracts and put options. While mortgage contracts do not include explicit "put" options, they can provide borrowers with the ability to limit their losses in the event of falling house prices. This optionality has been exploited in the past, leading to ruthless defaults and negative impacts on the housing market. As such, it is important for lenders and policymakers to carefully consider the implications of mortgage optionality when designing loan products and setting industry regulations.

The absence of a 'put' or 'call' in mortgage contracts

A put option is a financial contract that gives the buyer the right to sell an asset—without any obligation to do so—at a specific price within a specific time frame. A call option, on the other hand, gives the holder the right to buy an asset at a specified price. Put and call options are traded on various underlying assets, including stocks, currencies, bonds, commodities, futures, and indexes.

Mortgages took on the characteristics of options contracts during the Great Housing Bubble. However, mortgages are not option contracts, and lenders did not view themselves as selling option premiums to profit from the premium payments. Nevertheless, speculators viewed mortgages in this manner and treated them accordingly.

The absence of a put or call in mortgage contracts means that the contract holder does not have the right to force the contract writer to buy or sell a particular asset at a given price. In the context of mortgages, the contract writer is typically the lender, and the contract holder is the borrower. Without a put or call option, the lender is not obligated to sell the mortgage to the borrower at a specific price, and the borrower does not have the right to force the lender to buy back the mortgage from them.

The absence of these options in mortgage contracts means that the borrower is committed to the full value of the loan and is responsible for repaying it over the specified term. It also means that the lender does not have the same level of flexibility to buy or sell the mortgage contract and is instead locked into the agreement with the borrower.

The absence of put and call options in mortgage contracts can impact the level of risk and flexibility for both the lender and the borrower. Without these options, the borrower may face a higher risk of default if they are unable to keep up with the loan repayments. Additionally, they may have limited options for early repayment or refinancing without incurring additional fees or penalties.

In summary, the absence of a put or call in mortgage contracts means that the contract holder does not have the right to force the contract writer to buy or sell an asset at a given price. This can result in a higher level of commitment and risk for the borrower and a reduced level of flexibility for both parties involved in the mortgage contract.

The impact of exercising the put on mortgage pricing

A put option is a financial contract that gives the buyer the right to sell an asset at a specific price by a specific date. In the context of mortgages, the borrower can be viewed as the holder of a put option, with the lender being the seller. The borrower has the right to sell the house to the lender (the bank) at a predetermined price (the mortgage value) by a specific date (the maturity of the mortgage).

Secondly, exercising the put option can influence the pricing of mortgages offered by the lender in the future. When a lender takes back possession of a house through foreclosure or short sale, it incurs various costs, including legal fees, maintenance expenses, and potential losses on the sale of the property. To mitigate these costs, lenders may increase the pricing of their mortgages or adjust their lending criteria to reduce the likelihood of similar occurrences in the future.

Additionally, the exercise of a put option by a borrower can impact the lender's risk assessment and underwriting process. The lender may reevaluate the risk profile of similar mortgages and adjust their pricing accordingly. For example, if a particular geographical area experiences a high number of put option exercises, the lender may increase the interest rates or down payment requirements for mortgages in that region to compensate for the perceived higher risk.

Furthermore, the exercise of a put option can have a reputational impact on the lender. If a lender is perceived as being too lenient or accommodating in allowing borrowers to exercise their put options, it may attract additional speculators seeking similar opportunities. This could lead to a moral hazard problem, where borrowers take on excessive risk knowing that they can offload the property to the lender at a later date. To mitigate this risk, lenders may respond by tightening their lending criteria or increasing mortgage pricing across the board.

In summary, the exercise of a put option in the context of mortgages can have a direct impact on the pricing of the underlying asset, influence future mortgage pricing, affect the lender's risk assessment and underwriting process, and potentially impact the lender's reputation and business practices. These factors collectively contribute to the overall impact on mortgage pricing and the broader housing market.

Frequently asked questions