A Guide To Investing In Sustainable Funds

Sustainable investing is an increasingly popular approach that seeks out investment opportunities that also benefit the natural environment. It involves investing in companies that are solving the world's biggest challenges, pioneering better ways of doing business, and creating a future that is environmentally, socially, and economically sustainable. This can include companies in the renewable energy sector, such as wind, solar, and hydropower, as well as those that focus on electric vehicles, pollution control, sustainable agriculture, and water infrastructure. Sustainable investing is not just a do-gooder approach, but it is also a financially prudent strategy. Major investment firms, such as BlackRock and J.P. Morgan, recognize the potential for sustainable investing to drive outperformance and long-term structural shifts in global investor preferences. This trend is expected to continue, with more and more investors seeking to align their investments with their values and priorities.

ESG integration

ESG stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance. ESG integration is the practice of incorporating ESG information into investment decisions to enhance risk-adjusted returns. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to ESG integration, but it generally involves making research, data, and insights available to portfolio managers and working with them to identify potential process enhancements across all investment activities.

When assessing a company's ESG performance, investors consider a range of environmental, social, and governance factors. Environmental criteria may include a company's climate policies, energy use, waste management, and natural resource conservation. Social criteria evaluate a company's relationships with internal and external stakeholders, including labour standards, employee health and safety, and community impact. Governance factors relate to a company's leadership, executive pay, accounting methods, transparency, and shareholder rights.

By integrating ESG information into investment decisions, investors can build portfolios that align with their values and contribute to positive environmental and social outcomes.

Impact investing

There are two main approaches to impact investing: socially responsible investing (SRI) and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing. SRI involves eliminating or selecting investments according to specific ethical guidelines, such as avoiding companies involved in producing or selling alcohol, tobacco, or firearms. ESG investing, on the other hand, focuses on companies with ethical governance, prioritizing the well-being of workers in their supply chain, or working towards positive environmental outcomes and sustainable business practices.

When considering impact investing, it is important to clarify your motivations and goals. Some impact investors are driven by social impact, innovation, or a priority on self-sustaining operating models. Others are attracted to the power of market forces to create social good or focus on financial returns with a secondary focus on social impact. It is also important to consider your risk tolerance and desired time horizon for both social change and financial returns.

Examples of impact investment funds include the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Soros Economic Development Fund, and the Ford Foundation. These organizations have invested in ventures that align with their goals, such as improving health, education, gender equality, democracy, and legal reforms.

Socially responsible investing

SRI involves investing in companies that are considered socially responsible due to the nature of the business they conduct. This could include companies engaged in social justice, environmental sustainability, and alternative energy/clean technology efforts.

SRI has two inherent goals: social impact and financial gain. However, these two goals do not always go hand in hand. When considering an SRI strategy, investors should carefully weigh the potential for financial returns along with the social impact.

There are two main approaches to SRI: negative screening and positive screening. Negative screening involves avoiding investments in companies that are seen as not socially beneficial, such as those involved in weapons, defence, tobacco, or fossil fuel extraction. Positive screening, on the other hand, involves actively choosing to support companies that implement positive social and environmental policies.

The demand for SRI has been increasing in recent years. According to a 2019 Morgan Stanley survey, 85% of individual investors expressed interest in sustainable investing. This trend is also reflected in the growing number of SRI funds available to investors.

When building an SRI portfolio, it is important to first decide on your values and what specific social or environmental issues you want to focus on. You can then research and choose individual stocks or invest in mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that align with your values. It is important to carefully review the holdings and expense ratios of any fund before investing.

Some examples of SRI mutual funds and ETFs include the Parnassus Core Equity Fund (PRBLX), which incorporates environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into its decision-making, and the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN), which invests in socially responsible companies focused on clean energy.

In conclusion, SRI allows investors to align their investments with their values and create positive social change while also pursuing financial returns. By carefully researching and selecting investments, investors can build an SRI portfolio that reflects their personal definitions of social responsibility.

Sustainable funds

There are a few different types of sustainable investing strategies. One is dedicated sustainable investing products, which can involve eliminating certain companies or sectors associated with increased ESG (environmental, social, and governance) risk or which violate the asset owner's values. Another strategy is ESG integration, which is the practice of incorporating ESG information into investment decisions to enhance risk-adjusted returns. Impact investing is another strategy, which aims to generate specific, beneficial social or environmental effects alongside financial gains.

There are a number of ways to take an ESG-style investing approach, including ETFs that track indices and specialty funds that do not include stocks related to areas like tobacco and fossil fuels. There are also sustainable funds offered by top fund companies like Vanguard and Fidelity. When considering a sustainable fund, it's important to research the fund's criteria to ensure that its values align with your own.

Some examples of sustainable funds include iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF, iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, and Putnam Sustainable Leaders. When evaluating specific stocks, it can be tricky to judge the holistic picture of a company's sustainability profile. It's important to consider a company's sustainability practices and how well they manage sustainability risks and opportunities.

ESG shareholder activism

ESG shareholder activists aim to prompt change within companies by undertaking a spectrum of activities, including proxy contests and shareholder resolutions. While activism has traditionally focused on governance topics such as board composition and executive remuneration, the recent surge in campaigns with environmental and social objectives indicates a shift in investor priorities.

The success of Engine No. 1, a small hedge fund that acquired a stake in ExxonMobil and launched a proxy contest to address the company's approach to climate change, is a notable example of ESG shareholder activism. Engine No. 1 gained the support of large institutional shareholders and secured three seats on Exxon's board, signalling a victory for those advocating for the integration of climate risk and financial risk.

The rise of ESG shareholder activism has important implications for companies. Firstly, companies should recognize that investors are increasingly demanding transparency and accountability on environmental, social, and governance issues. This includes detailed reporting on sustainability initiatives and a commitment to addressing social inequalities, such as diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Secondly, companies should be prepared to engage with activist shareholders respectfully and be responsive to criticism, particularly regarding ESG-related issues. It is crucial for companies to have a well-developed ESG strategy and be able to articulate how they are addressing relevant environmental, social, and governance topics.

Additionally, companies should continuously strive to improve their ESG performance and disclosures, staying aligned with industry peers and meeting the expectations of investors and stakeholders. This includes enhancing decision-making processes to incorporate ESG considerations and ensuring that ESG is a component of strategic decision-making.

Furthermore, companies should be cautious when making changes to governance or policy in response to ESG-themed activist campaigns. While it is important to address the concerns raised by activists, making hasty or superficial changes can be perceived as insincere and may backfire.

In conclusion, ESG shareholder activism is an increasingly prominent force in the investment landscape. Companies must recognize the importance of addressing ESG issues and be prepared to engage with activists to avoid becoming targets for criticism and potential board changes. By proactively integrating ESG into their business strategies and disclosures, companies can demonstrate their commitment to creating long-term value for all stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, and communities.

Frequently asked questions