Index Funds: Utopia Or Dystopia For Investors?

Index funds are a popular investment choice, but what would happen if everyone invested in them? Some experts, like Nobel Prize-winning economist Robert Shiller, have questioned the value of index investing and raised concerns about the potential impact on the market if 100% of investors adopted this strategy. While this scenario is unlikely, it's worth exploring its potential consequences. One concern is that active traders are essential for price discovery and market efficiency, and without them, the market could break down. Additionally, with everyone investing in index funds, there would be no market capitalization and investors might end up owning overvalued stocks. However, others argue that this concern is overblown and that active managers dropping out of the market could even lead to a more efficient market.

The market would be broken

If everyone invested in index funds, the market would be broken.

Firstly, the market capitalization would cease to exist. Market capitalization is the process by which active traders decide which stocks are the most valuable and which show little promise. Without active traders, there would be no one to determine the value of stocks. This would result in a mispricing of stocks, with some being wildly overvalued and others undervalued. This would be detrimental to investors, as they would be unable to make informed decisions about which stocks to invest in.

Secondly, the absence of active traders would mean that stock prices would no longer reflect the fair value of companies. Instead, stock prices would be determined solely by the inflow of funds to indexes. This would disrupt the supply and demand dynamics that typically drive stock prices.

Additionally, the lack of active traders could lead to a decrease in competition among companies. Active traders create competition by putting pressure on companies to maximize their value. Without this pressure, companies may become less competitive, which could harm consumers and hinder industry innovation.

Furthermore, the market would suffer from a lack of fundamental analysis on securities. Active traders conduct extensive research and analysis to beat the market. Without this level of scrutiny, it would be challenging to identify promising investments, and capital may flow towards bad investments.

Finally, the market would lose its function as a "market." The stock market relies on the constant interaction between buyers and sellers to set stock prices. If everyone invested in index funds, there would be no buyers and sellers actively negotiating prices, and the market mechanism would break down.

No market capitalization

If everyone invested in index funds, there would be no market capitalization. Market capitalization is dependent on active traders who decide which stocks are the most valuable and which show little promise. Without these active traders, it is impossible to value stocks.

Index funds do not engage in price discovery, which is an essential aspect of the market. While index funds reflect the total market and own every stock, they do so in the percentage for each fund's market cap. If there were no index funds, the entire market would be actively managed.

Currently, approximately 20% of all stocks are owned by index funds, leaving 80% actively traded. This means that even if 100% of investor assets were invested in index funds, it would still be relatively easy to identify which stocks are over or undervalued.

If everyone invested in index funds, active managers would likely leave the industry, resulting in only mediocre passive managers remaining. This would harm the market's overall performance as investors would be unable to determine the true value of a security, leading to mispricing.

In summary, a shift to 100% index fund investing is unlikely to occur as it would result in a broken market where stock prices are not accurately valued.

Total investor portfolios won't equal total market value

The total portfolios of all investors and managers must equal the market's entire value. Index funds reflecting the total market own every stock, but in the percentage for each fund's market cap. If there were no index funds, the entire market would be actively managed.

Mathematically, active managers will always fall behind the market, on average. Before trading costs and other fees are added in, the return for the actively managed dollar will equal the return for the passively managed dollar. However, the active manager pays those costs, which lessens the return, while the passive manager does not.

Additionally, a passive manager of an index fund holds every security in that particular index. In contrast, an active manager will have a different portfolio at least some of the time. Active managers conduct a lot of trades, but the number of active managers regularly beating the market is close to non-existent.

If everyone were to invest in index funds, the result could be that only mediocre passive managers would remain, harming the market's overall performance. Not many professionals would stay to perform the kind of work inherent to market efficiency, such as the necessary fundamental analysis of each security.

As a result, investors, even passive ones, would essentially be flying blind when it came to the true value of a security, and mispricing would boom. This means that index fund investors would own shares of stock that are wildly overvalued. Adequate valuation of securities would prove virtually impossible. The result is not just a lethargic market, but capital not flowing into promising investments. Indeed, capital would head towards bad investments on an equal level with good investments.

Active manager dropout

One of the main concerns about a potential shift to index funds is the impact on active managers and their role in the market. Active managers are responsible for buying and selling stocks, driving price discovery, and ensuring efficient market functioning. However, with the rise of index funds, there is a possibility that many active managers may drop out of the market, leading to potential issues.

Firstly, active managers play a crucial role in determining the market value of stocks through their buying and selling decisions. Without active traders, the market capitalization of stocks would be challenging to ascertain. While index funds track market capitalization, they do not participate in price discovery to the same extent as active traders. As a result, if everyone invested solely in index funds, the market for buyers and sellers would no longer set the fair market price of stocks, disrupting the efficient functioning of the market.

Additionally, the presence of active managers contributes to market efficiency by conducting fundamental analysis and research on individual securities. With more investors shifting to index funds, there could be a decrease in the number of active managers performing this crucial work. This could result in investors, even passive ones, having less information about the true value of securities, leading to potential mispricing and overvaluation of stocks.

However, it is important to note that the impact of active manager dropout may not be entirely negative. The active managers who remain in the market are likely to be more skilled and better at their jobs, as the poor performers are the ones who tend to drop out. This could lead to a more efficient market, as the remaining managers are more capable of identifying and capitalising on valuable investments.

Furthermore, the concern about active manager dropout leading to market inefficiency may be overblown. The likelihood of 100% of investors shifting to index funds is highly unlikely, and even with the increasing popularity of index funds, active managers still drive most price discovery due to their higher trade volume. Additionally, if market inefficiencies arise due to a high proportion of index fund investors, it will create opportunities for active managers to exploit these inefficiencies, potentially rebalancing the market towards active investing.

In conclusion, while the dropout of active managers may lead to challenges in market capitalization and security valuation, it is unlikely to completely disrupt the market. The remaining active managers are likely to be more skilled, and the self-correcting nature of the market will encourage a shift back to active investing if inefficiencies arise.

Mispricing would be common

If everyone invested in index funds, mispricing would be common. This is because active traders, who decide which stocks are the most valuable, would cease to exist. Without active traders, there would be no market capitalization, and it would be impossible to value stocks. This would result in investors, even passive ones, flying blind when it came to the true value of a security, and mispricing would boom.

Index funds do not participate in the price discovery process like the traditional practice of buying and selling individual stocks. They are pools of money that buy groups of stocks in certain proportions at the current stock market price. They do not take a view on what the price of a stock should be. Therefore, if every investor in the world only purchased the same index fund, the market of buyers and sellers would no longer set the fair market price of the stocks. The stock market would no longer be a "market".

As a result, investors in index funds would own shares of stock that are wildly overvalued. Adequate valuation of securities would be virtually impossible, and capital would flow into bad investments on the same level as good investments. The market would become lethargic, and investors would miss out on promising investments.

However, it is important to note that this scenario is purely theoretical and unlikely to occur. Currently, index funds only own a small percentage of the stock market, and most investors still actively manage their investments. Additionally, active managers who remain in the market would likely be more skilled, improving market efficiency.

Frequently asked questions