Biden's Retirement Investment Rule: A Game-Changer For Americans' Golden Years

President Biden's retirement investment rule is designed to protect Americans' retirement savings by cracking down on junk fees and ensuring financial advisers act in the best interests of their clients. The rule expands the definition of a fiduciary to include any financial services provider who offers investment advice for a fee and claims to act in their client's best interest. This means that financial advisers must provide “prudent, loyal, honest advice free from overcharges” and avoid recommendations that favour their interests over their clients'. The Biden administration argues that the previous definition, written in 1975, was outdated and needed updating to reflect changes in the retirement landscape. The new rule has faced opposition from some who argue that it will cause people to lose access to investment advice, while others support it for closing loopholes in the retirement advice industry.

Closing loopholes to ensure advice is in the saver's best interest

On October 31, 2023, the Biden administration proposed a new rule to close loopholes and ensure that the financial advice Americans receive for retirement is in their best interest. The rule, called the Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment Advice Fiduciary, updates the definition of an investment advice fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code.

The proposed rule would require financial advisors, brokers, and insurance agents to adhere to the fiduciary standard on rollover IRAs. This means that they would have to provide advice that is in the best interest of the saver, regardless of the product being recommended or the nature of the advice. Currently, advice on purchasing securities such as mutual funds must be in the saver's best interest, but this does not extend to commodities or insurance products like fixed index annuities. The new rule would ensure that advice on all types of investments would have to be in the saver's best interest.

Closing these loopholes is important because it can increase retirement savers' returns by between 0.2% and 1.2% per year, adding up to 20% more in retirement savings over a lifetime. Additionally, it would prevent conflicts of interest where brokers recommend "suitable" investments that pay them more at the expense of the customer.

The Biden administration's rule also addresses the issue of "junk fees", which are fees that are not in the best interest of the saver and can reduce their lifetime savings. For example, fixed index annuities, which are based on a particular market index, have additional costs and fees compared to mutual funds, and brokers may be incentivized by the higher commissions to recommend these products even if they are not in the best interest of the investor. The White House Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) estimates that as much as $5 billion is lost annually due to "conflicted investment advice" on fixed index annuities.

The Retirement Security Rule is part of the Biden administration's larger effort to crack down on "junk fees" across various industries, including banking and air travel. While the rule has been praised by liberals and industry critics for closing existing loopholes, it has also faced opposition from some who argue that it will limit people's access to investment advice.

Removing the requirement for fiduciaries to provide regular advice

The Biden administration's Retirement Security Rule removes the requirement for fiduciaries to provide advice on a regular basis, bringing one-time advice under the rule. This is part of an update to the definition of an investment advice fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code.

The previous definition, written in 1975, stated that a fiduciary must provide advice to the plan, plan fiduciary, or IRA owner on the value of securities or other property, or make recommendations as to the advisability of investing in, purchasing, or selling securities or other property. This advice must serve as the primary basis for investment decisions and be individualized based on the particular needs of the plan or IRA.

The new rule expands the definition of a fiduciary to include any financial services provider who offers investment advice to a retirement investor for a fee and who claims to be acting as a fiduciary or who a reasonable investor understands to be a trusted adviser acting in their best interest. This change brings one-time financial advice, such as that given for 401(k) rollovers, under the fiduciary standard.

The Biden administration has argued that the previous definition was outdated and did not adequately protect Americans' retirement savings. The new rule aims to ensure that financial advisors are providing trustworthy advice and that retirement savings are not being eaten away by junk fees.

The removal of the requirement for fiduciaries to provide regular advice is intended to provide greater protection for retirement investors, particularly those receiving advice on rollover transactions. It gives financial institutions and investment professionals more flexibility in providing advice and ensures that they adhere to stringent standards, acting in the best interest of their clients.

The rule's impact on the financial industry

Biden's Retirement Security Rule will have a significant impact on the financial industry. The rule expands the fiduciary standard, which traditionally covers advice on purchasing securities, to include new types of non-securities, such as fixed index annuities, and one-time advice for transactions like 401(k) rollovers. This expansion will bring about greater regulatory oversight of Wall Street firms and require them to comply with costly disclosure exemptions.

The rule also targets "junk fees" in retirement products, which could provide billions in savings for Americans. Junk fees refer to the additional costs and fees associated with certain financial products, such as fixed index annuities, which can eat away at retirement savings over time. By cutting these fees, the rule will make it more affordable for individuals to seek financial advice and better protect their retirement savings.

Furthermore, the rule will hold financial advisers to a higher standard of conduct by requiring them to provide "prudent, loyal, and honest advice free from overcharges." This means that advisers must put their clients' interests first and avoid recommendations that favour their own interests at the expense of their clients. This updated definition of a fiduciary will ensure that retirement investors receive unbiased and trustworthy advice.

The Biden administration's rule has been met with opposition from some industry groups, who argue that it will limit people's access to investment advice by narrowing their options to fiduciary advisors, who typically work with clients who have significant amounts of money to invest. However, liberals and industry critics support the rule, claiming that it closes existing loopholes that allowed advisers to provide conflicted advice.

Overall, Biden's Retirement Security Rule seeks to strengthen protections for Americans saving for retirement by ensuring they receive sound financial advice, lowering junk fees, and providing greater peace of mind about their retirement portfolios.

The Biden administration's argument for the rule

The Biden administration's argument for the Retirement Security Rule is that it will strengthen protections for Americans saving for retirement. The rule, proposed by the Department of Labor, aims to close loopholes and ensure that financial advice for retirement is in the best interest of the saver.

Under the current system, financial advisers are allowed to recommend investments that pay higher commissions but may not be the best choice for their clients. The Biden administration contends that this creates conflicts of interest, where advisers may be incentivized to recommend investment products that generate lower returns for savers. These conflicts of interest can result in substantial losses for investors, with the White House Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) estimating a loss of up to $5 billion annually due to "conflicted investment advice" on fixed-index annuities alone.

The Retirement Security Rule seeks to address these issues by expanding the fiduciary standard. This standard, which currently covers advice on purchasing securities like mutual funds, will be extended to include new types of non-securities, such as fixed-index annuities, one-time advice for transactions like 401(k) rollovers, and advice to employers and plan fiduciaries. By requiring advisers to act as fiduciaries in a broader range of situations, the rule aims to ensure that recommendations are always made in the best interest of the saver rather than chasing the highest payday.

The Biden administration also emphasizes that the rule will cut down on "junk fees" in retirement products, potentially providing billions more in savings for those saving for retirement. These junk fees, often hidden within complex financial products, can eat away at the retirement savings of Americans. By minimizing these fees and promoting competition, the rule aims to protect the retirement security of American workers and ensure they can retire with dignity.

Opposition to the rule

Biden's Retirement Security Rule has faced opposition from several quarters, including politicians, industry groups, and critics who argue that it could negatively impact retirement savers and the financial industry.

One of the main arguments against the rule is that it represents "dangerous federal overreach." Senator Joe Manchin and 15 Republican senators introduced a resolution to overturn the rule, claiming that it would cause people to "lose access to investment advice due to how broadly the rule defines fiduciary." They argue that the rule could limit people's options for professional financial guidance, as it leaves retirement savers with fiduciary advisors as their only option. Fiduciary advisors typically work with clients who have a significant amount of money to invest, often requiring a minimum of $100,000. This could make it more challenging for individuals with smaller retirement savings to access the advice and guidance they need.

Industry groups, including the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI), the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors (NAIFA), and the Insured Retirement Institute (IRI), have also voiced their opposition to the rule. They argue that it will negatively impact the retirement savings industry and limit the options available to savers. They claim that the rule is a "fiduciary-only approach" that disregards the evidence of its adverse impact on retirement savers. The industry groups also allege that the rule is similar to previous regulations that were struck down in court, suggesting that it may face legal challenges again.

Another criticism of the rule is that it could reduce access to quality financial advice. By requiring advisors to provide advice that is in the best interest of the saver, some argue that it may discourage advisors from offering certain types of advice or recommending specific investment products. This could limit the range of options available to retirement savers and potentially impact their ability to make informed decisions about their financial future.

Some critics also argue that the rule could lead to increased costs for consumers. By requiring advisors to adhere to stricter standards and avoid conflicts of interest, there may be additional fees or charges associated with seeking financial advice. This could particularly impact individuals with smaller retirement savings, who may struggle to afford the potentially higher costs of financial advice.

Overall, the opposition to Biden's Retirement Security Rule stems from concerns about reduced access to financial advice, limited options for retirement savers, and potential negative impacts on the retirement savings industry. Critics argue that the rule could have unintended consequences that ultimately harm the very people it aims to protect.

Frequently asked questions