War Fears: Investing Amid India-Pakistan Tensions

The ongoing conflict between India and Pakistan has its roots in the 1947 Partition of British India, which created a Muslim-majority Pakistan and a Hindu-majority India. The conflict has been ongoing for decades and has resulted in several wars and countless skirmishes. Both nations are nuclear powers, and the potential for a nuclear war is a very real threat. In the event of a war, investors should consider the potential impact on global food supplies, particularly cereal crops, which are expected to suffer significant declines in production. A war between India and Pakistan would also likely result in global famine, with many countries in the Global South experiencing food shortages and starvation.

The impact of nuclear weapons

The potential use of nuclear weapons is a critical factor in the conflict between India and Pakistan. Both countries have a history of tensions and conflicts, and the introduction of nuclear weapons in 1974 raised the stakes of any confrontation. With ongoing border disputes, militant activity, and political tensions, the possibility of a nuclear conflict cannot be ruled out. The impact of nuclear weapons in this context would be devastating and far-reaching.

In the event of a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan, the direct fatalities would be catastrophic, with an estimated 50 to 125 million deaths. The use of nuclear weapons would result in massive destruction and loss of life in the targeted areas. The blast radius of nuclear weapons is extensive, and the resulting heat, radiation, and blast effects would cause immediate casualties and infrastructure damage. The impact would not be limited to the immediate blast zones, as the release of radioactive particles and fallout would contaminate a wide area, leading to long-term health issues and environmental degradation.

Beyond the immediate physical destruction, the broader consequences for the region and the world would be profound. The detonation of nuclear weapons would generate massive amounts of smoke and debris, releasing 16 to 36 teragrams of black carbon into the atmosphere, according to a study by Cheryl S. Harrison, Lili Xi, and Nicole Lovenduski. This would block out sunlight and lead to a significant drop in global temperatures and precipitation. The study projects a decrease in global average precipitation by 15% to 30% and a decline in plant productivity by 15% to 30% on land and 5% to 15% in oceans. Such disruptions would have severe implications for agriculture and the global food supply, threatening mass starvation and economic crises.

The potential impact on the global climate is a critical concern. The aforementioned study also suggests that a nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan could jeopardize the entire planet. The release of massive amounts of smoke and particulate matter into the atmosphere could lead to a "nuclear winter" scenario, causing sharp drops in temperatures and sunlight reaching the Earth's surface. This would have far-reaching consequences for global agriculture, potentially leading to widespread crop failures and food shortages. The environmental impact would be long-lasting, with effects persisting for years or even decades after the initial detonations.

The political and economic fallout of a nuclear conflict would also be significant. The use of nuclear weapons would likely lead to a breakdown of diplomatic relations and increased global tensions. The potential for escalation and the involvement of other nuclear-armed states cannot be ruled out. The economic consequences would be severe, with disruptions to trade, supply chains, and financial markets. The impact on global energy supplies and prices could also be significant, given the region's importance in energy markets.

In summary, the impact of nuclear weapons in a conflict between India and Pakistan would be devastating and far-reaching. The direct human and physical destruction would be catastrophic, and the broader consequences for the global climate, environment, politics, and economy would be severe. The potential use of nuclear weapons adds a critical layer of complexity and urgency to the ongoing tensions between the two countries.

The role of the US in mediating tensions

The United States has a history of attempting to mediate tensions between India and Pakistan, with varying levels of success. During the 1965 war between the two countries, the US and the UK provided military supplies to India, and supported a UN resolution calling for an end to the fighting and negotiations on the settlement of the Kashmir problem. The US and the UK also cut off arms supplies to both belligerents, which had a greater impact on Pakistan due to its weaker military position. This led to a ceasefire, but tensions remained high, and the conflict was not resolved.

In the 1960s, the United States and the United Kingdom held six rounds of talks to resolve the Kashmir dispute, but these were largely unsuccessful. However, US intervention in the Kargil War of 1999 was credited with averting nuclear war and laying the groundwork for post-Cold War relations between the US and India.

The United States' relationships with India and Pakistan have evolved over time. US-Pakistani relations have historically been more consistently positive, with the US government viewing Pakistan as a moderate Muslim state and a key ally in counterterrorism and regional stability, particularly after the 9/11 attacks. On the other hand, the US has had ambivalent relations with India, due to India's involvement in the non-aligned movement during the Cold War. However, in recent years, US-India relations have strengthened, with the two countries deepening their defense cooperation.

The US's parallel relationships with India and Pakistan have limited its credibility as an impartial mediator in the dispute. Additionally, the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, compounded by Pakistan's domestic unrest and increasing ties with China, has further complicated the dynamics between the three countries.

China's involvement in the region

Historically, China and Pakistan have had close military and strategic relations. After the 1965 war between India and Pakistan, Pakistan signed the Sino-Pakistan Agreement to delineate their mutual border. China has also increased its military, political, and economic cooperation with Pakistan through initiatives like the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). CPEC includes infrastructure projects such as hydroelectric power stations and fiber-optic cabling along the disputed Kashmir territory.

However, China has also been increasingly assertive in its border disputes with India, particularly in the Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh regions. Clashes broke out in the Galwan Valley in 2020, and another skirmish occurred in Arunachal Pradesh in 2022. China's renaming of places in Arunachal Pradesh in 2023 further escalated tensions.

China's collaboration with Pakistan and its border disputes with India have prompted greater militarization along the disputed borders, and India now fears the prospect of a conflict with both countries. China's involvement in the region has important geopolitical implications and influences the dynamics between India and Pakistan.

The economic impact of war

Disproportionate Impact:

While the Indian economy would suffer a setback, the very existence of Pakistan's economy would be threatened. Pakistan's GDP is approximately $305 billion, and the country faces challenges such as high debt, inflation, a falling currency, and a fiscal deficit. In contrast, India's GDP is $2.7 trillion, placing it among the top five economies globally. A war would disrupt both economies, but Pakistan's smaller and weaker economy would be more vulnerable to the negative consequences.

Increased Debt:

Both countries already have significant debt. Pakistan relies heavily on borrowing to sustain its economy, and if support from nations like Saudi Arabia and China were to cease, its survival would be at stake. War would deplete the resources of an already fragile Pakistan. India also faces a fiscal deficit, and the cost of conflict would exacerbate this issue. The previous Kargil war cost India almost $1 billion per week, and the current conflict is estimated to cost $1 billion per day. This would lead to a substantial increase in the fiscal deficit, requiring higher taxes, which would, in turn, make Indian products less competitive globally.

Increased Defence Spending:

Pakistan is known for its military focus, with approximately 26% of its budget attributed to military spending during peacetime. In the event of war, almost their entire budget would need to be diverted to military efforts, leaving no room for social or economic programs. India would also experience a dramatic increase in military spending to recoup losses, compensate survivors, and rehabilitate injured soldiers and civilians.

Loss of Investment:

Businesses and investors tend to avoid war zones due to instability, higher taxes, and security concerns. Both India and Pakistan's economies are heavily dependent on foreign investment, and a conflict would likely lead to a significant loss of investment, negatively impacting both countries.

In summary, the economic fallout from a war between India and Pakistan would be significant, with Pakistan's economy potentially facing existential threats and India's growth and development being set back by years. The fragile economies of both countries would suffer, and the consequences would be felt most acutely by the ordinary people as resources are diverted from social programs towards military spending.

The likelihood of war

Historical Context

India and Pakistan have a history of conflict and tension since the partition of British India in 1947, which resulted in the creation of the dominions of India and Pakistan. The partition was intended to establish a clean divide between a secular, Hindu-majority India and a Muslim-majority Pakistan. However, the princely states, including the largest state of Jammu and Kashmir, were given the choice to accede to either country or remain independent. This decision sparked the First Kashmir War in 1947-48, which ended with a UN-mediated ceasefire and the division of Kashmir between the two countries.

Since then, India and Pakistan have engaged in multiple wars and conflicts, primarily centred around the disputed region of Kashmir. The Second Kashmir War occurred in 1965 when Pakistani forces attempted to infiltrate Jammu and Kashmir, leading to a full-scale military attack by India. The conflict ended with a ceasefire negotiated by the Soviet Union and the USA. The 1971 war was precipitated by the Bangladesh Liberation War in erstwhile East Pakistan, resulting in the independence of Bangladesh with Indian support. Other notable conflicts include the Kargil War in 1999, initiated by Pakistani incursions across the Line of Control, and various border skirmishes and standoffs in the following decades.

Territorial Disputes and Border Tensions

The dispute over Kashmir remains the predominant cause of conflict between India and Pakistan. Both countries claim Kashmir based on religious and strategic considerations, and the region has witnessed insurgency, cross-border terrorism, and military confrontations. India has also accused Pakistan of supporting militant groups carrying out attacks across India, while Pakistan has accused India of causing the insurgency in Balochistan with the help of Baloch leaders and terrorist organisations.

In recent years, border tensions have escalated with frequent exchanges of fire along the Line of Control. In 2019, India revoked Article 370 of its constitution, removing the special status of Jammu and Kashmir and further angering Pakistan. The Indian government's push for centralised control over the region and its crackdown on independent media and redrawing of the electoral map have contributed to the ongoing tensions.

Nuclear Capabilities

Both India and Pakistan are nuclear powers, with India testing its first nuclear weapon in 1974 and Pakistan achieving the same milestone two decades later. The introduction of nuclear weapons raised the stakes of any confrontation and has been a significant deterrent against all-out war. However, it is important to note that both countries have a history of conducting airstrikes and engaging in military skirmishes along the disputed border.

While a full-scale war between India and Pakistan is unlikely due to the presence of nuclear weapons, the possibility of limited military confrontations, border skirmishes, and proxy conflicts fuelled by territorial disputes and ideological differences cannot be ruled out. The complex dynamics between the two countries, shaped by historical tensions and competing interests, contribute to a volatile relationship that could escalate if not carefully managed.

Frequently asked questions