Understanding Levered Etfs: Investor Hesitancy Explained

Leveraged ETFs are a type of security that uses financial derivatives and debt to amplify the returns of an underlying index or other assets it tracks. While they can offer high returns, they also come with high risks and expenses, making them unsuitable for long-term investments.

Leveraged ETFs are designed for short-term trading and day-to-day speculation, aiming to take advantage of quick, daily movements in financial markets. They are not meant for buy-and-hold strategies as their value tends to decay over time, even if the underlying price movements are favourable.

The main risk with leveraged ETFs is that they can amplify losses just as much as gains. This is due to the daily rebalancing or resetting of these funds to maintain their target leverage ratio. When the underlying index moves in the opposite direction of the bet, losses can be multiplied, and it becomes harder to recover from these losses. Additionally, leveraged ETFs have higher fees and expense ratios compared to traditional ETFs, which can add up to significant costs over the long term.

While leveraged ETFs can offer the potential for significant gains, they also come with the risk of significant losses. As such, investors need to carefully consider the associated risks and have a thorough understanding of how these complex financial instruments work before investing.

Leveraged ETFs are designed for short-term trading, not long-term investing

Leveraged ETFs are designed for short-term trading and are not suitable for long-term investing. This is due to several factors, including the impact of daily resets, high fees and expenses, and the potential for significant losses.

Daily resets, also known as rebalancing, are necessary for leveraged ETFs to maintain their target leverage ratio. This means that the fund's portfolio is adjusted at the end of each day, which can lead to higher transaction costs and a divergence from the simple multiplier of the underlying index's returns over longer periods. The sequence of daily gains and losses matters due to this daily reset mechanism, making it challenging to achieve consistent returns over time.

Additionally, leveraged ETFs tend to have high fees and expense ratios compared to traditional ETFs. These expenses can add up over time, eroding potential gains. For example, the ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ), a 3x leveraged ETF tracking the Nasdaq 100, has a gross expense ratio of 0.98%, while the Invesco QQQ (QQQ), a non-leveraged ETF tracking the same index, has an expense ratio of only 0.20%.

Moreover, leveraged ETFs can lead to significant losses that exceed the underlying index or assets. The use of leverage magnifies both gains and losses, and in volatile markets, compounding can result in substantial declines. For instance, during the first half of 2020, the ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO), a 3x leveraged ETF, lost 40% of its value while the S&P 500 only declined by 5%.

Furthermore, leveraged ETFs are typically used by day traders and are not designed for long-term strategies. The derivatives used for leverage, such as futures contracts and options, are not long-term investments, making it challenging to hold leveraged ETFs for extended periods.

In summary, while leveraged ETFs offer the potential for significant gains, they also come with higher risks and expenses. They are intended for short-term trading and are not suitable for long-term investing due to the impact of daily resets, high fees, and the potential for substantial losses.

They carry high fees and expenses

Leveraged ETFs are considered riskier than other investment options due to their high fees and expenses. These costs can significantly impact long-term returns, making them less attractive for investors seeking steady, long-term gains.

Triple-leveraged (3x) ETFs, for example, have high expense ratios, typically around 1% per year. This is significantly higher than typical stock market index ETFs, which often have low expense ratios. For instance, the Invesco QQQ (QQQ), a non-leveraged ETF tracking the Nasdaq 100, has an expense ratio of 0.20%. In contrast, the ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ), a 3x leveraged ETF on the same index, has a gross expense ratio of 0.98%.

The higher fees associated with leveraged ETFs are due to the use of derivatives, such as futures contracts, swaps, and options, which introduce additional risks. These derivatives are necessary for the daily rebalancing that leveraged ETFs require. The frequent trading of these derivatives incurs transaction costs and interest expenses, which further add to the overall fees.

Additionally, leveraged ETFs may also have management and transaction fees, further increasing the overall costs for investors. These expenses can quickly add up, especially for investors holding leveraged ETFs over extended periods.

The impact of high fees and expenses on long-term returns cannot be overstated. Even a small difference in expense ratios can result in substantial losses for investors over time. This is why investors need to carefully consider the fees associated with leveraged ETFs before investing.

While leveraged ETFs offer the potential for higher returns, it is crucial to remember that these gains come at a cost. The high fees and expenses associated with these investment vehicles can significantly impact long-term returns, making them less attractive for investors seeking steady, long-term gains. Therefore, investors should thoroughly evaluate the costs involved before investing in leveraged ETFs.

They are highly volatile and can amplify losses

Leveraged ETFs are highly volatile and can amplify losses due to their daily rebalancing mechanism. This means that while they can generate significant gains in a bull market, they can also lead to substantial losses in a down market.

The daily rebalancing process, also known as a "reset", is a critical feature of leveraged ETFs. It involves the fund adjusting its portfolio at the end of each day to maintain its target leverage ratio. For example, if a 2x leveraged ETF experiences a 5% loss in a day, it will need to trade derivatives to increase its exposure and get back to its target 2:1 ratio. This process can be costly and erode the fund's returns over time.

Additionally, the compounding effect of gains and losses in a leveraged ETF can lead to permanent losses in volatile markets. This is because the impact of a loss is greater than the impact of an equivalent gain. For instance, a 20% loss on a $100 investment would require a gain of 25% to recoup the original $100. This makes it challenging to recover from catastrophic losses.

The high fees and expense ratios associated with leveraged ETFs further compound the risks. These funds often charge around 1% per year, which can add up to significant costs over the long run.

Overall, the volatility and daily rebalancing of leveraged ETFs can lead to amplified losses, making them unsuitable for long-term investing. They are designed for short-term trading strategies and are best suited for experienced traders who can tolerate the increased risk of loss.

They are complex and unpredictable

Leveraged ETFs are complex and unpredictable, and their performance can deviate significantly from their daily targets. They are designed for very short holding periods, such as intraday, and their value tends to decay over time even if the underlying price movements are favourable.

The inherent volatility of leveraged ETFs often leads to returns that diverge markedly from their daily targets. This is known as volatility decay or volatility drag. Volatility in a leveraged fund can quickly lead to losses for an investor.

For example, consider the period from February 2020 to January 2023: while the QQQ, which tracks the Nasdaq-100, appreciated by approximately 30.76%, the TQQQ, a 3x leveraged version of the same index, actually declined by 11.37%.

Leveraged ETFs are designed to amplify the daily returns of an underlying index. They are only intended for very short holding periods. Over time, their value will tend to decay even if the underlying price movements are favourable.

Compounding—the cumulative effect of applying gains and losses to a principal amount of capital over time—is a clear risk for 3x ETFs. Traders calculate compounding with mathematical formulas, and this process can cause significant gains or losses in leveraged ETFs.

For example, assume an investor has placed $100 in a triple-leveraged fund. If the price of the benchmark index goes up 5% one day and down 5% the next trading day, the 3x leveraged fund goes up 15% and down 15% on consecutive days. After the first day of trading, the initial $100 investment is worth $115. The next day after trading closes, the initial investment is now worth $97.75. That represents a loss of 2.25% on an investment that would normally track the benchmark without the use of leverage.

The daily reset mechanism causes LETFs to rebalance their portfolios daily to maintain their leverage. Thus, they won't necessarily work for a buy-and-hold strategy since their returns are a function of maintaining debt-to-equity within each fund. This resetting effect allows the ETF to seek 3x leverage daily but can cause longer-term returns to diverge significantly from simply compounding the underlying index's returns.

The sequence of daily gains and losses matters because of the daily reset mechanism. While useful for very short-term trading strategies, LETFs like FAS generally should not be expected to achieve a consistent 3x return compared with the tracked index or assets for longer periods.

The complex nature and the impact of daily rebalancing make leveraged ETFs unsuitable for longer-term investments. Investors should use caution, as these ETFs entail higher risk and volatility than traditional ETFs. Because of their sensitivity to market fluctuations and the costs associated with their operation, LETFs should be used with a clear understanding of their mechanisms and potential impacts on investment portfolios.

They are subject to regulatory scrutiny

Leveraged ETFs are subject to regulatory scrutiny due to their potential impact on market volatility. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) first allowed LETFs in 2006, and since then, market analysts have expressed concern about their effect on overall market volatility. The concern is that LETFs, by design, can magnify major swings in the market.

The complex nature of LETFs, their use of derivatives, and the impact of daily rebalancing make them unsuitable for longer-term investments. They are intended for day-to-day trading, and their results over longer periods are unpredictable. The daily reset mechanism, or constant leverage trap, can cause longer-term returns to diverge significantly from simply compounding the underlying index's returns. This resetting effect allows the ETF to seek a higher daily return, but it can also lead to substantial losses.

Additionally, LETFs are considered risky because they utilise more leverage to achieve higher returns. The more leverage used, the greater the potential for significant gains or losses. The inherent volatility of leveraged ETFs can lead to returns that deviate markedly from their daily targets, a phenomenon known as volatility decay or volatility drag.

The risks associated with LETFs have prompted cautionary statements from financial news outlets and regulatory bodies, such as the SEC, which has tried to balance product availability with mitigating the risk of misuse.

Frequently asked questions