Govt Id: A Necessary Evil For Bitcoin Investment?

Bitcoin was initially hyped as a way to divorce identity from spending, but the demand that you show ID to buy and sell altcoins has caused a disconnect. Most governments consider altcoins as money and have implemented regulations to prevent money laundering and terrorism financing. As a result, exchanges must collect personal information on all customers and report potentially fraudulent activities. However, if you want to buy bitcoins from non-money transmitters, such as via peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms, the ID requirement is usually waived. Additionally, you can use a Bitcoin ATM, which often doesn't require an ID and can pay in cash.

Anti-money laundering and counter-financing of terrorism laws

Bitcoin was created in 2008 to serve as an alternative payment mechanism for the under-banked, un-banked, or those in regions where the formal financial system is inefficient or highly corrupt. However, criminals and terrorists quickly took advantage of its peer-to-peer nature and pseudo-anonymity to facilitate extensive terrorist financing and money laundering schemes.

Money laundering is the process of making the proceeds of criminal activity appear to have been obtained legally. Terrorist financiers and other criminals use the formal financial system, new payment methods such as bitcoin, traditional methods of value transfer such as hawala, trade-based money laundering, and cash couriers, especially in countries with weak or non-existent national anti-money laundering/counter-financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) laws.

AML/CFT policies and measures are designed to prevent and combat these crimes and protect the integrity and stability of financial markets and the global financial system. Effective AML/CFT policies are key to the stability of member countries' economies and the international financial system.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank estimate that criminals launder $2 trillion to $4 trillion each year. This has far-reaching consequences, including destabilizing "hot money" resulting from inflows and outflows, banking crises, ineffective revenue collection, broader governance weaknesses, reputational risks for international financial centers, and the loss of correspondent banking relationships (CBRs).

To address these issues, most governments have classified cryptocurrencies as money. For example, in the United States, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, a bureau of the US Department of the Treasury, considers bitcoin a "decentralized convertible virtual currency." This means that bitcoin transmitters must follow the same federal rules as fiat currency transmitters, especially regarding AML/CFT protections as defined by the Bank Secrecy Act.

As a result, exchanges must collect personal information on all customers, report potentially fraudulent activities, and take decisive action to prevent money laundering, including denying service. These measures are known as Know-Your-Customer (KYC) regulations.

While some people prefer to remain anonymous when buying and selling bitcoin, they can do so via peer-to-peer (P2P) trading, non-exchange-hosted wallets, P2P trading websites, non-exchange bitcoin ATMs, or in-person trades with local bitcoin enthusiast groups. However, it is important to note that these services may charge higher prices and surcharges, and it is crucial to be aware of the risks and relevant laws regarding the purchase and exchange of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

Know-Your-Customer Regulations

Know-Your-Customer (KYC) regulations are a set of guidelines and regulations that require financial services professionals to verify the identity, suitability, and risks involved in maintaining a business relationship with a customer. The procedures fall within the broader scope of anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) regulations.

KYC processes are employed by companies of all sizes to ensure that their customers, agents, consultants, or distributors are anti-bribery compliant and are who they say they are. While initially, these regulations were only imposed on financial institutions, non-financial industries, fintech, virtual asset dealers, and even non-profit organizations are now included in the regulations in many countries.

In the United States, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Rule 2090 states that financial institutions must use reasonable diligence to identify and retain the identity of every customer and any person acting on their behalf. To enforce this rule, organizations are expected to collect all information essential to knowing their customers. This includes the Customer Identification Program (CIP), Customer Due Diligence (CDD), and Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD).

The Customer Identification Program, as outlined in Section 326 of the USA Patriot Act, requires banks and other financial institutions to collect four pieces of identifying information about its customers, including an identification number and customer due diligence.

The Bank Secrecy Act, also known as the Currency and Foreign Transaction Reporting Act of 1970, established the customer due diligence (CDD) rule to improve financial transparency and deter money laundering. The CDD rule has four core requirements:

• Identify and verify the identity of customers.
• Identify and verify the identity of the beneficial owners of companies opening accounts.
• Understand the nature and purpose of customer relationships to develop customer risk profiles.
• Conduct ongoing monitoring to identify and report suspicious transactions and, on a risk basis, maintain and update customer information.

Enhanced due diligence is required when initial identity checks have been completed and high-risk factors have been identified for an individual or business. This involves additional due diligence, including a source of wealth and funds check, additional identity research, and risk identification and assessment.

KYC regulations are in place to protect businesses and consumers engaged in digital currency trading and to prevent banks from being used for money laundering activities. While some may view these regulations as an invasion of privacy, they are essential to ensuring legal compliance, protecting the community, and ensuring trust and safety online.

Protecting businesses and consumers

The requirement for government-issued ID to buy and sell bitcoin is primarily driven by regulations aimed at protecting businesses and consumers engaged in digital currency trading. Most governments view bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as money, and therefore, businesses dealing in bitcoin are subject to anti-money laundering and know-your-customer (AML/KYC) regulations. These regulations are designed to prevent money laundering, fraud, and other financial crimes. By collecting personal information and verifying the identity of customers, exchanges can better comply with these regulations and mitigate potential risks.

The case of Mutum Sigillum, the US subsidiary of Mt. Gox, illustrates the importance of KYC regulations. In 2014, Mt. Gox, which handled over 70% of the world's bitcoin transactions, was shut down after nearly 850,000 bitcoins were stolen. Mutum Sigillum was found to have used an American bank account to accept and pay fiat currency for Mt. Gox transactions without registering with the US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) or collecting the required AML/KYC documentation. This resulted in the seizure of Mutum Sigillum by FinCEN, highlighting the need for strict customer identification and verification procedures to protect businesses and consumers from financial crimes.

Additionally, the volatile nature of cryptocurrency prices poses challenges for government agencies that routinely seize and sell valuable assets. The US government, for example, has been criticized for selling bitcoins at low prices due to the time lag between obtaining the necessary permissions and the actual sale. This volatility can impact the profits generated from the sale of confiscated bitcoins, affecting government budgets and creating novel situations that existing regulations may not fully address.

To comply with AML/KYC regulations and protect their businesses and customers, bitcoin exchanges must collect personal information, including government-issued IDs, from their customers. This allows them to verify the identity of their users and mitigate potential risks associated with financial crimes and fraudulent activities. By implementing these measures, exchanges can better protect themselves and their customers from potential losses and legal consequences.

While some users may prefer to maintain anonymity when purchasing bitcoin, the need to protect businesses and consumers from financial crimes and ensure compliance with government regulations takes precedence. The use of government-issued IDs helps create a safer and more transparent environment for all participants in the digital currency trading ecosystem.

Anonymity and privacy

Bitcoin is often described as a way to transact anonymously. However, it is more accurate to say that Bitcoin provides pseudonymity, rather than anonymity. This is because identities are not recorded in the Bitcoin protocol itself, but every transaction performed with Bitcoin is visible on the distributed electronic public ledger known as the blockchain.

Bitcoin's pseudonymity is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it is a point of attraction for those seeking financial privacy. On the other hand, it poses a challenge for financial regulation, particularly with regard to compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) statutes and know-your-customer (KYC) controls.

For many users, their participation in Bitcoin entails linking their personal identity to their Bitcoin holdings, effectively eliminating any anonymity. However, for those who wish to take advantage of Bitcoin's intrinsic pseudonymity, alternative entry points are available, such as acquiring Bitcoin through private transactions, as compensation for goods or services, or as a reward for mining.

Various techniques can be employed to enhance anonymity when using Bitcoin. These include avoiding address reuse, using wallets that do not leak information, broadcasting transactions over the Tor network, and utilising additional privacy-preserving tools such as CoinJoin and Lightning Network.

It is important to note that achieving complete anonymity with Bitcoin is challenging, and even dedicated users willing to go to great lengths may find their identities and activities compromised at some point due to the open nature of the blockchain and the possibility of deanonymization techniques.

Country-specific regulations

The legal status of Bitcoin varies from country to country. While it is legal in most developed countries, including the US, Japan, the UK, and Canada, it is banned in other countries, such as China, Morocco, Iraq, and Qatar. Some countries, like India, have not completely banned cryptocurrencies but have imposed regulations and taxes on their use.

In the US, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) considers bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as property and has issued guidelines for taxpayers. The US Treasury has also defined Bitcoin as a convertible currency with an equivalent value in real currency or one that can act as a substitute. Under current US laws, any entity that administers or exchanges Bitcoin is subject to the Bank Secrecy Act and must register with the US Treasury and file reports on transactions over $10,000.

In the UK, the government has allowed the use of cryptocurrencies since their introduction and has been working on developing a framework for crypto asset regulation. In 2023, the UK updated its Financial Services and Markets Act to guide the regulation of digital assets, allowing the government to designate and regulate crypto asset activities with reporting, operational, and consumer protection requirements.

Canada maintains a generally bitcoin-friendly stance, similar to the US. The Canada Revenue Agency defines Bitcoin as a crypto-asset that is taxed based on the circumstances in which it was used. Any income or capital gain from a Bitcoin transaction must be reported. Cryptocurrency exchanges in Canada are considered money service businesses and fall under the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act. As a result, these exchanges must register with the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) and comply with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regulations.

The European Union (EU) has not passed specific legislation regarding Bitcoin as a currency but has stated that VAT/GST is not applicable to the conversion between traditional currency and Bitcoin. While the majority of EU countries have opted for a soft regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, the EU has been working on legislation to regulate virtual assets and keep financial regulatory frameworks from fragmenting.

In contrast, some countries have completely banned the use of cryptocurrencies. For example, in China, the People's Bank of China prohibited financial institutions from handling Bitcoin transactions in 2013 and effectively banned cryptocurrency exchanges in 2017. India has also imposed restrictions on cryptocurrencies, with the Reserve Bank of India banning banks from dealing in Bitcoin and leaving the overall legal status unclear.

Frequently asked questions