Dollar-Cost Averaging: A Risky Retirement Gamble

Dollar-cost averaging is a popular investment strategy that involves investing a fixed amount of money into an investment at regular intervals, typically monthly or bi-weekly. It is often touted as a way to reduce risk and boost returns. However, despite its popularity, dollar-cost averaging may not be the best strategy for retirement investing.

Here's why:

Lump-sum investing often produces higher returns than dollar-cost averaging

According to data from Northwestern Mutual, lump-sum investing outperforms dollar-cost averaging almost 75% of the time, regardless of asset allocation. For portfolios with 100% bonds, the rate of outperformance was 90%. For portfolios with 100% stocks, the return on lump-sum investing outperformed 75% of the time.

Lump-sum investing can be the best option if you are comfortable with risk, as investing a large sum of money all at once puts more risk than holding some of your investment funds in cash. However, it can also mean more time to maximize returns. On the other hand, dollar-cost averaging may be the preferred choice for investors who are worried about taking on immediate risk.

Dollar-cost averaging can help shield investors from losses by spreading out investments over time and through market fluctuations. It also mitigates timing risk by spreading out investments and aiming to balance out the average price per share between higher and lower share prices. However, opportunity risk may limit your gains, as holding off on investing can mean missing out on growth.

Overall, lump-sum investing often produces higher returns than dollar-cost averaging, but it is important for investors to consider their risk tolerance and investment goals when deciding which strategy to use.

Dollar-cost averaging is inefficient at protecting against risk

Dollar-cost averaging involves investing a consistent dollar amount in the same investment at regular intervals, such as monthly or bi-weekly. This strategy aims to reduce emotional reactions to market fluctuations and avoid the challenge of timing the market. However, it can also result in missed opportunities for higher returns. For example, if you invest a lump sum of $10,000 in a stock with a 10% annual increase at the beginning of a 10-year period, you will earn more than if you had invested the same amount slowly over time (e.g., $1,000 per year). In this case, investing the lump sum would result in earnings of $15,937.42, while the slow-but-steady approach would yield only $7,531.17.

Additionally, dollar-cost averaging may not be suitable for all investors. It is designed for those investing for the long term who don't have a large lump sum to invest all at once or those who want to avoid the challenge of timing the market. If you have a large sum to invest and are interested in short-term investments, other strategies may be more appropriate.

Furthermore, dollar-cost averaging requires selecting good underlying investments. Investing in a poor investment through dollar-cost averaging will not improve the outcome. The strategy works best with broad-based funds, such as an S&P 500 index fund, which has historically performed well over extended periods.

In summary, while dollar-cost averaging can help minimize risk and make investing more accessible, it may not provide optimal returns, especially over the long term. It is important for investors to consider their financial goals, risk tolerance, and investment options before deciding on a strategy.

Dollar-cost averaging contradicts asset allocation decisions

Dollar-cost averaging is a strategy that can help lower the amount you pay for investments and minimise risk. It involves investing a fixed amount of money in a target security at regular intervals over a certain period of time, regardless of price. This strategy is particularly useful for those who want to set up their investments and not have to worry about them frequently.

Firstly, it contradicts the asset allocation decision by effectively changing the allocation mix over time. For example, if an investor decides to allocate 60% of their portfolio to stocks and 40% to bonds, dollar-cost averaging would result in a more conservative allocation initially, as the money is gradually invested. This goes against the investor's original decision to allocate more heavily to stocks.

Secondly, dollar-cost averaging can delay getting to the desired asset allocation. By investing gradually, it takes longer to reach the intended allocation mix. This delay could result in missing out on potential gains, as the money is not invested according to the desired allocation from the start.

Thirdly, dollar-cost averaging may not be suitable for all market conditions. In a steadily rising market, investing a lump sum upfront is likely to result in higher returns compared to investing smaller amounts over time. Dollar-cost averaging assumes that prices will fluctuate and presents an opportunity to buy at lower prices. However, if the market is consistently trending upward, investing through dollar-cost averaging may not be optimal.

Finally, dollar-cost averaging may not be the best strategy for those with a large lump sum to invest. In this case, getting to the desired asset allocation as soon as possible is preferable, rather than spreading out investments over an extended period.

In conclusion, while dollar-cost averaging can be a useful strategy for certain investors, it is important to recognise how it may contradict or delay the desired asset allocation. It is essential for investors to carefully consider their investment goals, risk tolerance, and market conditions before deciding on an investment strategy.

Dollar-cost averaging may result in higher transaction costs

Dollar-cost averaging (DCA) is an investment strategy that involves buying a fixed amount of a target security at regular intervals, regardless of price. While this strategy can help investors manage risk and make investing more manageable, it may also result in higher transaction costs for several reasons.

Firstly, DCA typically involves investing smaller amounts of money over a more extended period. When investing in assets with transaction costs, such as brokerage fees, these costs can quickly add up and eat into returns. For example, if an investor incurs a $20 brokerage fee for each transaction and invests $500 every two weeks, the 4% cost of the brokerage fee is higher than the expected return of 0.23% on that $500 investment over two weeks. In this case, the transaction costs outweigh the benefits of having the money invested earlier.

Secondly, DCA removes the need to time the market, but it can also result in missed opportunities for higher returns. By investing a lump sum when the market is rising, investors can take advantage of compound interest and generate higher returns over time. With DCA, investors are less likely to achieve outsized returns because they are investing smaller amounts over a more extended period, potentially missing out on market gains.

Additionally, DCA requires investors to be disciplined and committed to their investment plan. If investors deviate from their plan or fail to invest regularly, they may end up with higher transaction costs without realising the benefits of DCA. For example, if an investor plans to invest $100 every month but skips a few months, they will incur the same transaction costs as if they had invested the full amount each month, reducing the effectiveness of the strategy.

Finally, DCA may result in higher transaction costs when investors use it as a delayed investment strategy for a large sum of money. In this case, the frequent transactions and associated costs can outweigh the benefits of having the money invested earlier. While DCA can be a useful strategy for investing smaller amounts regularly, it may not be optimal for investing large sums and could result in higher transaction costs without providing the intended benefits.

Dollar-cost averaging is not a substitute for identifying good investments

Dollar-cost averaging is a passive strategy that does not allow for dynamic portfolio management. If you opt for this approach, you will not be responding to fluctuations in the market, good or bad. For example, if you hear that a company is making an acquisition that will add to its earnings, you might want to increase your investment. However, dollar-cost averaging does not allow for this kind of flexibility.

Additionally, the market tends to rise over time, so investing a lump sum earlier is likely to generate better returns than investing smaller amounts over a long period. For instance, if you invest $10,000 in a stock that goes up about 10% annually at the beginning of a 10-year period, you will earn more than if you had invested the same amount more slowly over time, say $1,000 per year.

Therefore, it is important to identify good investments and do your research, even if you opt for the dollar-cost averaging approach. If the asset you choose is a bad pick, you will only be investing steadily into a losing investment.

Frequently asked questions