China's Strategic Snub: Why India Loses Out On Investments

India has become an attractive investment destination for Chinese companies, with bilateral relations valued at over $85 billion in the 21st century. However, tensions between the two countries have led to increased scrutiny of Chinese investments in India, with concerns about national security and money laundering. Despite this, Chinese companies continue to seek opportunities in the Indian market due to its size and potential for growth. The Indian government's Make in India policy and efforts to reduce dependence on China have further complicated the relationship. The future of Chinese investments in India remains uncertain, with ongoing debates about the potential benefits and challenges of such investments.

India's investment climate is unfavourable to Chinese companies due to stringent rules and regulations

• India's Enforcement Directorate (ED) has conducted raids and taken punitive actions against Chinese companies over alleged money laundering, fraud, tax evasion, and operating shell companies. This has created a climate of uncertainty and scrutiny for Chinese businesses operating in India.
• India's foreign direct investment (FDI) norms have been revised, requiring governmental approval for investments from countries sharing a land border with India, including China. This has made it more challenging for Chinese companies to invest in India.
• India has banned hundreds of Chinese apps, including popular social media, gaming, and e-commerce platforms, citing national security concerns. This has impacted Chinese companies' ability to reach Indian consumers and conduct business.
• India has excluded Chinese companies from participating in certain sectors and projects, such as highway construction and telecommunications. This limits the opportunities for Chinese companies to bid for lucrative contracts and contribute to India's economic development.
• India has implemented policies to promote local manufacturing and reduce its dependence on Chinese imports, such as the production-linked incentive (PLI) scheme. While this may benefit India's domestic industry, it makes the investment climate less favourable for Chinese companies.
• India's income tax department has conducted tax investigations and compliance reviews of Chinese mobile phone brands, creating a perception of increased scrutiny and regulatory burden for Chinese businesses.
• India's regulatory environment and land acquisition processes can be complex and time-consuming, especially for foreign companies. This can deter Chinese investors who are used to a more streamlined and efficient approval process in their home country.
• India's economic reform process has been slower than China's, and the Indian state faces budgetary constraints and limited taxation capabilities. This can impact the country's ability to invest in infrastructure and create a favourable business environment.

Overall, India's stringent rules and regulations, coupled with geopolitical tensions and a push for self-reliance, have made the investment climate less favourable for Chinese companies. Chinese businesses face increased scrutiny, regulatory hurdles, and limitations on their operations in India, which has impacted their ability to invest and operate freely in the country.

India's economic growth is dependent on its demographic advantage, which China lacks

China's youth population is declining, and the aging population is rising, leading to concerns about employment and stability. In contrast, India's young population contributes to economic growth and development, offering a demographic dividend for sustained economic growth with investments in education, skills, and job creation.

The large working-age population in India relative to the dependent population translates into increased productivity, higher savings, greater economic output, and increased consumption. The young population also represents a significant consumer market, stimulating economic activity and demand.

Additionally, India's edge over China is evident in the job market. China's youth are facing challenges in securing jobs, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Official statistics show a high jobless rate for urban youth, with one out of every five young urbanites in China without work.

India's demographic advantage provides a window of opportunity to harness the potential of its young workforce. Effective policies and investments in education, skill development, healthcare, job creation, and infrastructure are necessary to maximize this advantage.

In summary, India's economic growth is closely tied to its demographic advantage of a young and growing population. This provides a productive workforce and a large consumer market, driving economic development and growth. China, on the other hand, faces challenges due to its aging population and declining youth population.

India's infrastructure, investment and manufacturing sectors are underdeveloped compared to China's

India's infrastructure, investment, and manufacturing sectors are critical for its economic growth, but they face challenges when compared to China's more developed system. Here are some key points to consider:

Infrastructure

India's infrastructure sector, including transport, power, and urban development, is essential for its growth target of a $5 trillion economy by 2025. The government has been working towards enhancing infrastructure, with projects like the National Infrastructure Pipeline and "Smart Cities Mission." India has the world's third-largest road network, spanning over 3.3 million km, but there are concerns about the conditions of these roads, with 40% being unpaved. This affects the flow of traffic and commercial trade. India is investing heavily in strengthening its infrastructure; between 2008 and 2017, the government spent $1 trillion, and it plans to invest a further $1.4 trillion in the next five years.

Investment

India has attracted significant Chinese investment in various sectors, including electronics, automobiles, and power. Chinese companies have found India's market attractive due to its size and the country's push for self-reliance with the \"Make in India\" initiative. However, tensions between the two countries and India's desire to reduce its dependence on China have led to increased scrutiny of Chinese investments, with India imposing restrictions and even banning certain Chinese apps.

Manufacturing

India's manufacturing sector contributes 16% to its GDP, with plans to increase it to 25% by 2022 through the "Make in India" initiative. India offers cost-effective manufacturing alternatives, especially for labor-intensive products, due to its lower wages compared to China. However, companies also face challenges in India, such as a skills gap and inadequate infrastructure. India ranks 44th on the World Bank's Logistical Performance Index, while China ranks 26th, highlighting the differences in the quality and timeliness of infrastructure. India's government is working to improve this by increasing capital investment in infrastructure, which is expected to boost the sector's growth.

In summary, while India's infrastructure, investment, and manufacturing sectors offer significant opportunities, they also face challenges when compared to China. India is taking steps to address these issues, but it has a long way to go to catch up with China's more developed system.

India's democratic system creates challenges for implementing economic reforms

India's democratic system has created challenges for implementing economic reforms, which may be a factor in China's hesitancy to invest in the country. While India has been an attractive destination for Chinese companies, with its large market and manufacturing capabilities, India's democratic structure has, at times, hindered economic reforms.

Since the early 1990s, India has been committed to constitutionally mandated reforms to establish democratic local governance structures. This process of democratic decentralisation aimed to empower local governments to pursue grassroots planning and development. However, there is a growing consensus that this project may not have achieved its intended goals. State governments have been reluctant to devolve powers, and there have even been instances of proactive decentralisation steps being reversed. This reluctance is partly due to a lack of political will within the ruling elite, and the influence of the larger political economy, which unfolded in the 1990s with the adoption of economic reforms, liberalisation, privatisation, and globalisation.

The economic reforms in India have been characterised as a triumph over democratic decentralisation. The reforms, driven by the ruling elite, aimed to integrate India's economy with the global capitalist system and address the prevailing macroeconomic crisis. However, critics argue that these reforms, imposed from outside, have failed to address poverty and inequality and have emerged as a threat to democracy and local governance decentralisation.

The contradictory nature of economic reforms and democratic decentralisation lies in their underlying theoretical and developmental paradigms. While democratic decentralisation is based on distributive justice, economic reforms, particularly those aligned with neo-liberalism, tend to be centralising and driven by an accumulation paradigm. As a result, economic reforms can lead to the growth of monopoly and oligopolistic tendencies, accentuating resource concentration and inequalities. Additionally, the state's role may be severely undermined as it panders to the owners of global capital, leading to the de-politicisation of decision-making.

Furthermore, economic reforms introduce new principles of governance that can compromise the autonomy of local governments. The focus on maintaining sound fiscal balance under reforms curtails the resources of governments at various levels, resulting in expenditure compression, particularly in the social sectors. The market-based approach of reforms also introduces new mechanisms that emphasise individual rationality in resource and service management, potentially turning citizens into consumers.

Despite these challenges, successive Indian governments have remained committed to market-oriented reform. This commitment has been characterised by political manoeuvring, where governing elites have utilised a range of tactics to divide the opponents of reform. While India's democracy survives through these political tactics, the implementation of economic reforms has been hindered, creating a complex environment for foreign investment.

China's Belt and Road Initiative has made investing in India a new consensus among Chinese enterprises

China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been a significant factor in Chinese enterprises' growing interest in investing in India. The BRI, launched in 2013, is a global infrastructure development strategy that aims to invest in over 150 countries and international organizations. This initiative has created new markets for Chinese firms and channelled excess industrial capacity overseas, increasing China's access to resources and strengthening its ties with partner countries.

The BRI's impact on Chinese investment in India is evident in the following ways:

• India has become an attractive destination for Chinese companies due to its large market size and complete financial system.
• Chinese companies have sought to capitalise on India's manufacturing potential and invest in various sectors, including consumer electronics, high-end services, pharma, and digital technology.
• Chinese investment in India's power sector: Chinese companies have become major suppliers of power generation equipment to India, with India's power sector importing a significant amount of equipment from China.
• Chinese companies have invested in India's mobile phone market, with well-known smartphone brands such as Xiaomi, Vivo, and Oppo capturing a substantial market share.
• Chinese car companies have invested in India's growing auto parts and components industry, with companies like SAIC and Great Wall Motors establishing factories in the country.

Despite the growing investment, there are also tensions between China and India, including border disputes and India's concerns over the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which passes through the disputed territory of Kashmir. These issues have led to increased scrutiny of Chinese investments in India and efforts by the Indian government to reduce dependence on Chinese companies in certain sectors.

Frequently asked questions