Index Investing: Why The Hate?

Index investing is a popular investment strategy, but it also has its detractors. Some investors dislike the lack of control over their portfolios and the inability to react to market changes. Index funds are set portfolios, meaning investors cannot choose specific companies they like or want to own. This can be frustrating for those who want to invest in particular industries or have moral objections to certain companies. Index investing also prevents investors from seizing opportunities outside of the index and can result in lower personal satisfaction due to the passive nature of the strategy. Additionally, index funds may hurt investors in the long run by driving up stock prices and reducing returns.

Lack of control over holdings

Index funds are set portfolios, which means that investors have no control over the individual holdings in the portfolio. If an investor has specific companies that they like and want to own, such as a favourite bank or food company that they have researched and want to buy, they cannot do so with index funds.

Similarly, an investor may have ill feelings toward other companies for moral or personal reasons. For example, an investor may have issues with the way a company treats the environment or the products it makes. As a result, they may want to avoid investing in that company specifically. However, with index funds, investors cannot choose to exclude certain companies from their portfolios.

Index funds can also make it difficult for investors to align their investments with their values. For example, an investor who cares about environmental or social issues may want to invest in companies that are leaders in these areas. However, with index funds, investors do not have the ability to choose which companies they invest in, which can make it challenging to align their investments with their values.

Additionally, index funds can limit an investor's ability to express their views on corporate governance. For example, an investor may want to vote on shareholder proposals or influence the selection of candidates for a company's board of directors. However, with index funds, this level of involvement in corporate governance may not be possible.

Overall, the lack of control over holdings in index funds can be a significant disadvantage for investors who want to have a more active role in managing their investments and ensuring their portfolios align with their personal values and preferences.

Lack of downside protection

Index investing is a passive investment strategy that tracks a stock market index, such as the S&P 500. While this approach offers benefits like low costs and diversification, one of its significant drawbacks is the lack of downside protection. This means that investors are exposed to potential losses without any safety net.

Downside protection is a crucial objective for investors and fund managers, as it helps mitigate or prevent decreases in investment value. In the context of index investing, the lack of downside protection implies that there is no buffer or mechanism to limit losses if the market declines. Investors are fully vulnerable to the downside risks of the market.

Typically, downside protection is achieved through various instruments and methods, such as options contracts, hedging, stop-loss orders, or diversification. However, with index investing, the ability to employ these strategies is limited. For example, hedging strategies like shorting S&P 500 futures contracts or buying put options against the index can be complex and may not always be effective.

Additionally, the fixed composition of index funds restricts investors from making changes to their holdings. As a result, they cannot proactively adjust their portfolios to reduce risk exposure when certain stocks become overvalued. This lack of reactivity further contributes to the absence of downside protection in index investing.

To address the lack of downside protection, investors can consider diversifying their investments beyond index funds. This may include exploring other asset classes, such as real estate or non-market investments, or creating a liquid emergency fund separate from their long-term investments. While these strategies may not provide complete protection from market downturns, they can help mitigate the impact of losses.

Lack of reactive ability

Index investing does not allow investors to take advantage of advantageous behaviour. If a stock becomes overvalued, it carries more weight in the index, and this is when astute investors would want to be lowering their portfolios' exposure to that stock. However, if you invest solely through an index, you will not be able to act on that knowledge.

For example, if a stock is overvalued, it will start to carry more weight in the index. This is the opposite of what a knowledgeable investor would want to do, which is to reduce their exposure to that stock. However, with index investing, you are unable to make this move.

Another example is that of shorting stocks. If an investor believes a stock is overvalued, they may want to short it, or bet against it. However, with index investing, you are unable to do this as you are limited to the stocks in the index.

Additionally, index investing can make it difficult to react to market changes. For instance, if a particular industry or sector is performing well, an investor may want to increase their exposure to that area. However, with index investing, you are limited to the stocks in the index and may not be able to take advantage of the opportunity.

Furthermore, index investing can also limit your ability to react to changes in a company's performance. If a company is performing well and is expected to continue to do so, an investor may want to increase their investment in that company. However, with index investing, you are limited to the stocks in the index and may not be able to invest more in that particular company.

Limited exposure to different strategies

Index investing is a passive investment strategy that tracks a benchmark index, such as the S&P 500. This means that investors who choose index funds are limited to the strategy of that specific index. While this can provide diversification, it may not offer access to other successful investing strategies.

There are numerous strategies that investors have used to achieve success, and these strategies can be combined to provide better risk-adjusted returns. However, by investing in an index fund, you are restricted to the single strategy of the index. For example, the S&P 500 index fund tracks about 80% of all U.S. equities by market cap, and investors are limited to this strategy.

In contrast, by conducting research, investors can identify the best value stocks, growth stocks, and stocks that align with other strategies. This knowledge can then be used to create a smaller, more targeted portfolio that may be better positioned than the overall market and more suited to personal goals and risk tolerances.

Additionally, some investors may prefer to have control over the individual holdings in their portfolio. With index funds, investors have no control over the specific companies they invest in, as the portfolios are predetermined. This lack of control may be unappealing to investors who want to invest in specific companies they have researched or have a personal interest in.

Furthermore, index funds may not be able to pivot or react to market changes as actively managed funds can. The portfolios of index funds only change when their benchmark indexes change, and they are designed to mirror the performance of a specific market. This lack of flexibility can be a disadvantage during unfavourable market conditions or when certain stocks become overvalued.

While index investing has gained immense popularity due to its low costs and diversification benefits, it is important to consider the limitations it imposes on investors in terms of exposure to different strategies.

Dampened personal satisfaction

Index investing can dampen personal satisfaction for several reasons. Firstly, investing can be stressful, especially during market turmoil, and index investing does not alleviate this stress. Individuals may still find themselves constantly checking the market's performance and worrying about the economic landscape. Secondly, index investing removes the excitement and satisfaction of making good investments and being successful with one's money. The feeling of making the right choice and beating the market is lost when simply tracking an index.

Additionally, some people may find the idea of investing in the stock market and seeing their wealth grow unexciting. They may view investing as a chore or a second job, especially if they already work long hours. For these individuals, the prospect of investing may feel like a burden rather than an opportunity.

Furthermore, index investing may reduce returns for investors in the long run. As index funds become cheaper and more popular, more investors enter the stock market, driving up stock prices. This results in higher costs for individual investors, as they pay more for stocks without a change in the underlying worth of the companies. Consequently, expected returns fall, and investors may earn lower returns compared to a scenario without index funds.

Lastly, index investing may lead to a form of financial oligarchy, where a small group of investment managers holds significant control over public companies. This can reduce competition and lead to higher prices for consumers. The passive nature of index investing, where no one is behind the scenes actively managing investments, can contribute to this issue.

Frequently asked questions