The Evolution Of Investing: How This Old Financial Concept Transforms Portfolios

The world of finance is ever-evolving, and the internet has been a key driver of this change, creating a major paradigm shift. One notable development is the emergence of SPACs – Special Purpose Acquisition Companies – which offer a novel approach to investing, particularly in the tech sector. SPACs provide an alternative to traditional IPOs, allowing start-ups and innovative companies to raise capital and go public with greater speed and less scrutiny. This has been a game-changer for tech entrepreneurs, who often express dissatisfaction with the traditional IPO process.

Another significant trend is the rise of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investing, with investors increasingly seeking to align their investments with their values. BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, has been at the forefront of this movement, transitioning from ESG investing to a broader approach called transition investing, which involves investing in companies actively transitioning towards sustainability.

Additionally, the concept of Participatory Investment, or Grassroots Community Engaged Investment, aims to shift the power dynamics of investing by placing communities, particularly marginalised ones, at the centre of investment decisions.

These developments signal a broader transformation in the financial industry, with a growing emphasis on social impact, sustainability, and community empowerment.

The rise of SPACs

SPACs, or Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, have become an increasingly popular way for companies to go public without the traditional initial public offering (IPO) process. SPACs allow professional investors to create a shell company, which is listed publicly and can then be merged with or used to acquire an existing company, allowing that company to go public. This process is often referred to as "de-SPACing".

A "Backdoor" Way to Go Public

While SPACs are not a new concept, they have recently gained popularity as a "backdoor" way for companies to enter the public markets. In 2020, more than 200 SPACs went public, and this number continued to grow in 2021. Prior to the recent surge in popularity, SPACs were considered "very minor" and were "not very favorably viewed by brands as an option for going public".

Advantages of SPACs

There are several reasons why companies may choose to go public through a SPAC instead of a traditional IPO. One key advantage is speed; the process of de-SPACing can be much faster than a traditional IPO, taking as little as four months compared to over a year for an IPO. SPACs also offer cost savings, as the regulatory and underwriting fees associated with SPACs are typically lower than those of IPOs.

Additionally, SPACs provide companies with greater control over the process of going public and reduce uncertainty. They also allow companies to "hide your skeletons a little bit better" than with an IPO, as there are protections regarding forward-looking statements that apply to SPACs.

Potential Concerns

Despite the many advantages of SPACs, there are also some potential concerns. One worry is that the streamlined and speedy process of a SPAC could increase the risk of fraud for investors. There is also a question of whether the surge in SPACs will lead to actual returns for investors, as some SPACs have performed poorly on the stock market.

SPACs have become an increasingly popular alternative to traditional IPOs, offering companies a faster, more flexible, and less scrutinized way to go public. However, it remains to be seen whether this trend will continue in the long term or if it will face greater regulatory scrutiny and decline in popularity.

ESG and transition investing

ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investing and transition investing share the common goal of incorporating sustainability into investment strategies. However, they differ in their scope and focus. ESG investing, which began in the 1960s as socially responsible investing, takes a broader approach by evaluating a company's environmental, social, and governance practices. It considers a wide range of sustainability factors that may impact a company's long-term viability and reputation. On the other hand, transition investing specifically focuses on managing the risks and opportunities associated with the transition to a more sustainable economy, particularly the challenges and opportunities presented by decarbonization and the shift towards renewable energy sources. It targets sectors like energy and transportation, which will undergo significant changes in this transition.

ESG investing assesses a company's impact on the environment, its social responsibility initiatives, and the effectiveness of its governance structure. It takes into account various ESG metrics, ratings, and frameworks to evaluate a company's sustainability practices and risks. This holistic approach recognizes the importance of stakeholder engagement and addresses ESG concerns to maintain the company's social license to operate and long-term reputation. By integrating ESG considerations, investors aim to enhance risk-adjusted returns and identify companies better positioned for long-term success.

Transition investing, on the other hand, takes a sector-specific approach, focusing on industries directly impacted by the transition to a sustainable economy, such as energy, transportation, and manufacturing. It aims to identify companies leading decarbonization efforts and positioning themselves to thrive in the evolving sustainable economy. Transition investing considers both the risks and potential returns associated with the transition, including policy changes, technological advancements, and market disruptions. By understanding these dynamics, investors can make informed decisions to manage risk while seeking growth and value creation opportunities.

While ESG investing covers a broader set of sustainability considerations and sectors, it is not mutually exclusive from transition investing. Investors can incorporate both approaches, aligning their portfolios with sustainability goals while evaluating companies' ESG performance and navigating the evolving investment landscape. The choice between the two depends on investors' specific objectives, preferences, and investment philosophies.

With the increasing focus on sustainability and the energy transition, the ESG market is transitioning into "transition funds." This shift is influenced by factors such as the difficulty in assigning ESG ratings, the current political environment, and the higher costs associated with active ESG funds. However, this does not diminish the commitment of asset managers like BlackRock to social and environmental consciousness. They are directing efforts and investments towards infrastructure projects that accelerate the transition from fossil fuels.

Participatory investment

The Boston Ujima Project is another example of participatory investment. It is a place-based investment fund, controlled by community members in the Boston area, that supports businesses, real estate, and infrastructure projects that would otherwise struggle to find financing.

The REAL People's Fund is a further illustration of participatory investment. This $10 million fund, created by community organising groups, finances entrepreneurs of colour, with decision-making staying with the community groups.

The role of the internet

The internet has been a disruptive force in the world of investing, bringing about a major paradigm shift. It has had a profound impact on the way consumers buy and sell products, and this extends to the world of investing, especially for retail investors.

The internet revolutionized trading by introducing electronic markets and automatic order execution. This has resulted in lower fees, more efficient markets, and greater transparency for investors. The wide availability of information is perhaps the biggest benefit the internet has brought to investing. Before the internet, investors had to rely on libraries or contact companies directly for financial reports, which was costly and time-consuming. Now, investors can access online company reports immediately, and large financial documents can be downloaded within seconds and searched for specific information. This has given investors greater power and control over their financial information.

Hundreds of websites provide financial information for investors to analyze, and many are free to access. This has reduced the advantage that financial intermediaries, such as brokers and investment managers, previously held over individual investors. The internet has also contributed to the lowering of fees for investors, especially retail investors, who have seen a dramatic decline in the commission rates they pay to trade securities.

The benefits of the internet for trading are not without controversy, however. High-frequency traders (HFTs) have been credited with reducing bid-ask spreads but are also often accused of contributing to above-average stock market volatility.

Overall, the internet has had a transformative effect on investing, increasing efficiency, lowering costs, and empowering individual investors with greater access to information.

Alternative ownership enterprises

AOEs shift economic value and decision-making power towards non-investor stakeholders. They can take many forms, including cooperatives, employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs), and steward ownership models.

The traditional enterprise ownership model contributes to wealth inequality and disempowers working-class communities and communities of color. AOEs offer a way to transform the economy and create a more just and equitable system.

AOEs have the potential to reduce gender and racial inequality, increase civic participation, and improve financial performance and resilience to economic shocks. They can also help prevent "mission drift," where companies prioritize profit over their original purpose.

Who is involved in AOEs?

AOEs have gained support from a diverse range of players, including billionaires, private equity firms, and policymakers. Organizations like Transform Finance are also working to catalyze capital towards AOEs and educate and mobilize investors about their benefits.

One challenge for AOEs is the thin financing infrastructure, making it difficult for new funds to raise capital. However, the silver tsunami of baby boomer business owners retiring creates a significant opportunity for business conversions to AOEs.

Transform Finance has developed recommendations for investors interested in AOEs. They suggest shifting a meaningful percentage of economic and governance rights, prioritizing models that protect the company's mission, and committing to serving movements that advocate for racial and economic justice.

Frequently asked questions