Fidelity Investments: Navigating Internal Political Turmoil

Fidelity Investments is an American multinational financial services corporation based in Boston, Massachusetts. It is one of the largest asset managers in the world, with $5.8 trillion in assets under management and $15 trillion in assets under administration as of September 2024. The company has a long history dating back to 1930 and has consistently evolved to adapt to changing market needs, such as offering cryptocurrency trading and launching a Spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF).

However, despite its success and established presence in the industry, Fidelity has faced scrutiny for its internal practices and their impact on investors. A notable example is a 2016 Reuters investigation that revealed a conflict of interest between Fidelity and its private venture capital firm, F-Prime Capital Partners. This investigation uncovered instances where F-Prime Capital Partners benefited from early investments, while Fidelity was delayed, resulting in lower returns for Fidelity fund shareholders.

In addition to this, online reviews on Trustpilot suggest a pattern of negative experiences with Fidelity's customer service, with complaints about account issues, poor communication, and a lack of transparency.

These instances raise questions about the internal politics and practices within Fidelity Investments, suggesting a potential disconnect between the company's public image and the actual experiences of its customers.

Poor customer service

In addition to these issues, some customers have reported losing money due to errors on Fidelity's part and a lack of compensation. For example, one customer reported that their sell order did not show in the Active Trader Pro application, resulting in a loss of several hundred dollars. When they contacted Fidelity management, they were told that the company was not responsible for the loss and would not be offering any compensation.

Another common issue is the holding of funds without prior notice. Some customers have reported that Fidelity has held their funds for an extended period, such as 21 or 30 days, without providing an explanation. This has caused significant inconvenience and, in some cases, financial loss.

Overall, while Fidelity offers a wide range of investment options and tools, the company's customer service has been a source of frustration for many of its clients. These issues have led to negative reviews and some customers choosing to take their business elsewhere.

Poor communication

Some customers have also reported that Fidelity's customer service team is unhelpful and unresponsive. One customer stated that they were unable to get through to the customer service team for two weeks, while another said that the team was "rude, incompetent, [and] liar [s]".

In addition to poor communication with customers, there are also reports of poor internal communication within Fidelity. One customer reported that they were told by a Fidelity agent that their account had been closed, only to later discover that it was still active. Another customer reported that they were unable to get clear answers about their account because the information they received from different agents was contradictory.

Overall, the poor communication and customer service from Fidelity has left many customers feeling dissatisfied and frustrated.

Incompetent management

Fidelity Investments is one of the largest asset managers in the world, with trillions of dollars in assets under management. However, despite its financial prowess, the company has faced criticism for its internal politics and management practices.

One notable example of incompetent management at Fidelity involves the investigation into insiders' private investments. A 2016 Reuters investigation revealed that F-Prime Capital Partners, a private venture capital firm managed on behalf of Fidelity insiders, was able to make investments at a fraction of the price of Fidelity's public funds. This practice resulted in lower returns for Fidelity fund shareholders and posed a clear corporate conflict of interest.

In addition to the issues with insider investments, Fidelity has also been criticized for its customer service. Some clients have reported issues with account management, such as difficulties transferring funds, poor communication, and a lack of responsiveness from the company. There have also been instances where customers have lost money due to errors on Fidelity's part, and the company has been accused of not providing adequate compensation or resolution.

Furthermore, Fidelity has been fined multiple times by regulatory bodies for various violations. In 2007, the NASD, a division of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, fined four FMR-affiliated broker-dealers $3.75 million for alleged registration, supervision, and email retention violations. Additionally, in 2004, Fidelity Brokerage paid $2 million to settle charges by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for altering and destroying documents in several branch offices.

While Fidelity has taken steps to improve its customer service and compliance with regulations, these instances highlight areas where the company's management could be deemed incompetent or ineffective.

Lack of transparency

Fidelity Investments has been criticised for its lack of transparency in several areas. Firstly, there have been allegations of insider trading, with a 2016 Reuters investigation revealing that private venture capital firm F-Prime Capital Partners, managed on behalf of Fidelity Investments owners and other key leaders, was able to make investments at a fraction of the price of Fidelity Investments. Due to SEC regulations, investments by F-Prime Capital Partners prevented Fidelity from making the same early investments, resulting in lower returns for Fidelity fund shareholders.

In addition, Fidelity has been fined multiple times for document retention and supervision violations. In 2004, Fidelity paid $2 million to settle charges that employees altered and destroyed documents in 21 of its 88 branch offices between 2001 and 2002. In 2007, four FMR-affiliated broker-dealers were fined $3.75 million for similar violations, and two Fidelity broker-dealers were fined $400,000 for distributing misleading sales literature.

Furthermore, customers have complained about a lack of transparency regarding fund transfers and account closures. Some have reported that Fidelity makes it difficult to find information or the right contact for transfers, and that they are no longer able to manage their own money. Others have experienced unexpected account closures and issues with reactivating their accounts.

There have also been concerns about the transparency of fees, with customers reporting unexpected charges and difficulties understanding the fee structure. For example, while Fidelity offers commission-free stock and ETF trades, it charges $0.65 per contract for options trades, which is considered relatively high compared to other brokers.

Overall, while Fidelity has a strong reputation and offers a wide range of investment services, there are some areas where a lack of transparency has been an issue, leading to criticism and regulatory action.

Poor treatment of customers

While Fidelity has a strong reputation for its mutual funds and offers a wide range of investment options, there are several customer reviews that highlight poor treatment of customers. Many customers have complained about the company's poor customer service, with some reporting issues such as not being able to access their funds or having their funds held for an extended period of time without prior notice. There are also complaints about the company's handling of transfers, with customers reporting that the process is frustrating and that information is hard to find.

Some customers have also reported issues with the company's debit cards, with one customer stating that their card was declined at multiple retailers despite having funds available. Another customer reported that their card was not working for online or in-store purchases, which Fidelity attributed to a wider update of user cards. However, the customer was informed that their new card would not be sent out for another five months.

There are also several complaints about the company's response to issues, with some customers stating that their concerns were not adequately addressed or that they were unable to get in touch with the right people to resolve their problems. One customer reported that they were told by Fidelity management that they "don't care" about a mistake that had caused the customer to lose several hundred dollars.

Overall, while Fidelity offers a wide range of investment options and has a strong reputation, there are several instances of poor treatment of customers, with issues surrounding access to funds, transfers, debit cards, and inadequate responses to customer concerns.

Frequently asked questions