Assessing Investment Risk: Strategies For Measuring Success

Risk is the possibility of something unfavourable happening. When it comes to investments, risk is the potential for loss. There are several ways to measure investment risk, including alpha, beta, R-squared, standard deviation, and the Sharpe ratio. These statistical measures are historical predictors of investment risk and volatility, and they help investors make informed decisions by assessing the potential downside. One common measure of risk is volatility, which considers the likelihood of an asset's price movement with a certain probability. Another measure, Value-at-Risk (VaR), addresses the shortcoming of simple volatility by evaluating potential losses in extreme scenarios.

Standard Deviation

The calculation of standard deviation involves several steps. First, the mean of all data points is calculated by adding them together and dividing by the number of data points. Next, the variance for each data point is determined by subtracting the mean from the value of the data point. The third step is to square the variance of each data point. The sum of these squared values is then calculated. This sum is divided by the number of data points in the dataset less one, resulting in the variance. The final step is to take the square root of the variance to obtain the standard deviation.

Value at Risk (VaR)

There are three methods of calculating VaR: the historical method, the variance-covariance method, and the Monte Carlo simulation. The historical method re-organises actual historical returns, putting them in order from worst to best, and assumes that history will repeat itself. The variance-covariance method assumes that stock returns are normally distributed and only requires an estimate of two factors: an expected return and a standard deviation. The Monte Carlo simulation uses computational models to simulate projected returns over hundreds or thousands of possible iterations.

VaR has several advantages. It is a single number, expressed as a percentage or in price units, and is easily interpreted and widely used by financial industry professionals. VaR can be compared across different types of assets or portfolios. Due to its popularity, it is often included in various financial software tools.

However, there are also some disadvantages to using VaR. There is no standard protocol for the statistics used to determine asset, portfolio, or firm-wide risk. Statistics pulled from a period of low volatility, for example, may understate the potential for risk events to occur and the magnitude of those events. VaR may also provide a false sense of security as it does not report the maximum potential loss.

Risk Tolerance

One common method to assess risk tolerance is through the use of risk measures, which are statistical tools that predict investment risk and volatility. These risk measures include alpha, beta, R-squared, standard deviation, and the Sharpe ratio. Each of these measures provides a unique perspective on the risk associated with an investment.

Alpha measures the risk-adjusted performance of an investment compared to a benchmark index or the overall market. It calculates the "excess return" of an investment, indicating whether the performance is due to the manager's added value or the market's influence.

Beta assesses the volatility or systematic risk of an investment relative to the market or a benchmark index. A beta of one indicates that the investment moves in tandem with the market, while values above or below one suggest higher or lower volatility, respectively.

R-squared quantifies the correlation between an investment's performance and a benchmark index, expressing it as a percentage. A high R-squared value indicates a strong correlation, while a lower value suggests that other factors are influencing the investment's performance.

Standard deviation measures the volatility of an investment by evaluating how much the returns deviate from the long-term average. Higher standard deviation indicates greater volatility but not necessarily greater risk, as it does not differentiate between gains and losses.

The Sharpe ratio measures the performance of an investment relative to the risk taken. It calculates the units of return per unit of risk, indicating whether the higher returns are justified given the additional risk assumed. A higher Sharpe ratio suggests better risk-adjusted performance.

It is important to note that these risk measures provide a quantitative assessment of risk tolerance, but they should not be the sole factor in investment decision-making. Qualitative factors and an individual's personal circumstances should also be considered when determining risk tolerance.

Alpha and Beta Ratios

Alpha is a financial risk ratio that can be used to predict returns from holding an investment. It is a measure of the value created by active fund management or by an alternative index provider. It is also referred to as the 'abnormal rate of return' or 'active return'. Alpha provides a measure of an investment's performance relative to benchmark funds. It takes the volatility (price risk) of a security or fund portfolio and compares its risk-adjusted performance to a benchmark index. The excess return of the investment relative to the return of the benchmark index is its alpha. A positive alpha implies that a fund generated returns better than its benchmark over a certain period, while a negative number points to underperformance relative to the market. For example, an alpha of 1% indicates that a fund or share has outperformed its benchmark by 1%. Investors often prefer a high level of alpha.

Beta, meanwhile, measures how an investment responds to the ups and downs of the equity market. It shows how volatile an investment is compared to the market. Beta exposure is measured relative to a benchmark index like the S&P 500. Beta is the return generated from a financial investment that can be attributed to market returns. It is the proxy for exposure to systematic risk, unlike alpha (idiosyncratic risk). Beta is based on one, where one indicates that a stock or fund will move exactly in line with the benchmark or market. A beta of less than one implies that an investment is less volatile than the benchmark, while a reading above one points to above-average volatility based on past performance. For example, a fund with a beta value of 1.2 (meaning it is more volatile than its benchmark) would be expected to yield a 12% return if the benchmark's return over that period is 10%.

Alpha and beta are both based on historical performance, so they are unable to predict future returns. However, they can help investors identify stocks or funds that tend to perform well on a risk-adjusted basis. While many investors favour high alpha and low beta ratios, an investor with an appetite for risk might favour high-alpha, high-beta funds since these capitalise on upside volatility.

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio is a tool for measuring how well the return of an investment compensates the investor for the risk taken. It was developed by economist William F. Sharpe in 1966 and is also known as the Sharpe index, the Sharpe measure, and the reward-to-variability ratio. Sharpe won the Nobel Prize in economics for his work on the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) in 1990.

The Sharpe ratio compares the return of an investment with its risk. It is a mathematical expression of the insight that excess returns over a period of time may indicate more volatility and risk, rather than investing skill. The ratio is calculated by subtracting the risk-free rate of return from the expected rate of return, and then dividing that result by the standard deviation (the asset's volatility). The Sharpe ratio can be helpful when used to compare very similar investments, like mutual funds and ETFs that track the same underlying index.

A higher Sharpe ratio is generally considered better when comparing similar portfolios. A ratio of 1 or better is good, 2 or better is very good, and 3 or better is excellent. However, investors often compare the Sharpe ratio of a portfolio or fund with those of its peers or market sector. So, a portfolio with a Sharpe ratio of 1 might be considered lacking if most of its rivals have ratios above 1.2.

The Sharpe ratio has inherent weaknesses and may be overstated for some investment strategies. The standard deviation calculation in the ratio's denominator calculates volatility based on a normal distribution and is most useful when evaluating symmetrical probability distribution curves. However, financial markets can be subject to herding behaviour and can go to extremes much more often than a normal distribution would suggest is possible. As a result, the standard deviation used to calculate the Sharpe ratio may understate tail risk.

The Sharpe ratio is one of the most widely used methods for measuring risk-adjusted relative returns. It is also used to rank the performance of portfolio or mutual fund managers.

Frequently asked questions