Bond Index Funds: Safe Investment Havens?

Investing in bonds is a great way to balance out stocks, but it's important to understand the risks and nuances involved. Bonds are loans made to governments or companies, in exchange for regular income payments, known as coupons. They can be purchased through auctions or brokers, but this can be challenging, so exchange-traded funds (ETFs) provide an easier way to invest in a diverse basket of bonds.

When considering a bond index fund, it's worth noting that most of these funds are heavily invested in securities issued by indebted countries. This can result in an overly large allocation of your money going into government debt. Additionally, bond index funds may underperform compared to actively managed funds due to the significant amount of government debt.

However, during financial downturns, bond index funds that hold a large proportion of US government debt tend to hold up well due to the low default risk.

So, is there a safe bond index fund to invest in? Well, that depends on your risk tolerance and investment goals. You might consider funds with a shorter duration, which are more stable but sacrifice some upside potential, or funds that focus on high-quality corporate bonds, which steer clear of overly indebted companies. Ultimately, it's important to do your research and understand the trade-offs before investing.

Bond funds vs individual bonds

There are several factors to consider when deciding between investing in individual bonds or bond funds. These include diversification, convenience, costs, and control over maturity.

Diversification

Bond funds offer greater diversification per dollar invested. They give investors access to a basket of bonds from various issuers, with different maturity dates, coupon rates, and credit ratings. This broad diversification is typically achieved with a lower dollar commitment compared to individual bonds. On the other hand, individual bonds may require a significant amount of bonds to achieve adequate diversification across different sub-asset classes and issuers, which can be cost-prohibitive for some investors.

Convenience

Bond funds are more convenient as they require less time and effort from the investor. Investing in bond funds eliminates the need to research individual bonds and their issuers and to monitor their performance continuously. Bond funds also handle reinvesting coupon payments, usually on a monthly basis, whereas individual bonds typically pay coupon payments semi-annually.

Costs

Bond funds usually charge management fees, which can lead to higher costs and potentially lower returns. In contrast, individual bonds generally have a commission charged when purchased or sold, but there are no ongoing fees if the investor holds the bond to maturity.

Control over Maturity

Individual bonds offer greater control over maturity. Investors know the exact maturity dates of their bonds and can plan their income stream accordingly. With bond funds, there is no guarantee of recovering the principal at a specific time, especially in a rising-rate environment.

Other Considerations

The decision to invest in individual bonds or bond funds depends on various factors, including the amount of money available for investment, financial goals, and behavioural preferences. Individual bonds may be preferable for those seeking predictable value and certainty, while bond funds offer the advantage of professional management and greater diversification. Additionally, the time horizon and risk tolerance of the investor should be considered when making this decision.

Bond market volatility

The bond market is much bigger than the equity market, and signals problems ahead of the equity market because the underlying mechanics of finance happen in the bond market. Thus, volatility in the bond market is a concern for investors.

Recent volatility in the bond market has been driven by rising interest rates, with the Federal Reserve raising interest rates to stay on its policy-tightening path. This has caused yields to rise and prices to fall. For example, the 2-year Treasury yield hit 4.22%, its highest level since 2007, and the 10-year yield reached 4%, its highest since 2010.

Global developments, especially related to currencies, have also contributed to bond market volatility. For instance, Japan's intervention to support the yen and the UK's surprise fiscal policy stimulus have caused selloffs in global sovereign debt markets.

Thus, bond market volatility is an important indicator of potential issues in the financial markets and can impact investment decisions and strategies.

Interest rate risk

To understand interest rate risk, investors need to grasp the concept of duration. Duration is a measure of a bond fund's sensitivity to interest rate changes. The higher the duration, the more sensitive the fund is to interest rate fluctuations. For example, a duration of 4.0 means that a 1% increase in interest rates will lead to approximately a 4% drop in the fund's value. While duration provides a good starting point for comparing interest rate risks across different funds, it is a complex concept that involves precise measurements of interest sensitivity.

Another metric that is easier to comprehend is the weighted average maturity (WAM) or average effective maturity. WAM represents the weighted average time to maturity of the bonds in the portfolio, expressed in years. While WAM provides only an approximation of interest sensitivity, it is still useful for understanding the sensitivity of a bond fund to interest rate changes. The longer the WAM, the more sensitive the portfolio will be to shifts in interest rates.

Given the recent increases in U.S. Treasury yields and the expectation that bond yields are unlikely to fall anytime soon, investors need to carefully consider the interest rate risk associated with total bond index funds. This risk is particularly pertinent in the current low-interest-rate environment.

Credit risk

To minimize credit risk, investors should consider the credit quality of the bonds held by the fund. Funds with higher-quality bonds from issuers with strong credit ratings will generally have lower credit risk. Additionally, diversification across many different issuers can also help reduce overall credit risk.

It's worth noting that U.S. Treasury bonds, backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, are considered to have minimal credit risk. However, other types of bonds, such as corporate bonds or foreign government bonds, may carry higher credit risk.

When considering a bond index fund, it's essential to assess the credit risk associated with the underlying bonds. While diversification and low fees are attractive features of bond funds, investors must also carefully evaluate the creditworthiness of the bond issuers to make an informed investment decision.

Liquidity risk

To manage liquidity risk, bond OEFs employ tools such as liquidity buffers, swing pricing, redemption gates, and temporary suspension of redemptions. However, these tools may not always be effective in preventing spillovers and fire sales, especially during periods of market stress when asset liquidation costs are challenging to estimate.

Additionally, bond OEFs' inherent liquidity mismatch and constraints can lead to destabilising behaviour and fire sales. The liquidity management tools used are often geared towards individual funds rather than broader market impacts. When bond OEFs sell assets en masse to meet redemption demands, they can impair the liquidity of the underlying assets, resulting in adverse spillovers to other market participants with similar bond exposures.

Furthermore, factors such as highly correlated holdings across funds, the use of similar risk models, leverage through derivatives, and reduced dealers' intermediation capacity can exacerbate the impact of fire sales. As a result, funds could face steeper discounts when trying to sell bonds on a large scale.

To enhance the resilience of the bond fund sector, new macroprudential measures have been proposed, such as countercyclical liquidity buffers and adjustments to existing liquidity management tools. These measures aim to address the systemic risks posed by bond OEFs and ensure that tools internalise the effects of spillovers resulting from their actions.

Frequently asked questions