Active Investing: What Are The Hidden Risks?

Active investing is a hands-on approach to investing that involves buying and selling investments based on their short-term performance, with the aim of beating average market returns. While this strategy offers advantages such as flexibility and the ability to adapt to adverse market conditions, there are several associated risks. Active investing is typically more expensive due to higher fees and transaction costs, and it carries active and management risks, as fund managers can make costly mistakes. Additionally, active investing may contribute to market instability and is prone to herding behaviour, which can amplify market downturns. Furthermore, the performance of active funds relative to the market index should be carefully evaluated, as some active funds may be passive in nature.

Active investing is more expensive

Active investing is a lot more expensive than passive investing. The Investment Company Institute reports that the average expense ratio is 0.68% for an actively managed equity fund, compared to only 0.06% for the average passive equity fund. The higher fees are due to the frequent buying and selling of assets, which triggers transaction costs, and the salaries of the analyst team researching equity picks. These fees can add up over time and significantly reduce overall returns.

Passive investing, on the other hand, involves lower fees since there is less buying and selling of assets. Passive funds simply follow an index and do not require the same level of analysis and expertise as active investing. This makes passive investing a more cost-effective strategy, especially for long-term investors.

It is worth noting that while active investing has higher fees, it also offers more flexibility and the potential for higher returns. Active investors can adapt to market conditions and make contrarian moves, such as hedging their bets using techniques like short sales or put options. However, the higher fees associated with active investing can be a significant drawback, especially when compared to the ultra-low fees of passive investing.

The difference in fees between active and passive investing is an important consideration for investors. While active investing may offer more opportunities for hands-on investors, the higher fees can eat into returns over time. Passive investing, on the other hand, offers a more passive approach with lower fees, making it a more cost-effective strategy for long-term investors.

In summary, active investing is more expensive than passive investing due to the frequent trading and associated transaction costs, as well as the need to pay for the expertise of analysts. These higher fees can impact overall returns, making passive investing a more attractive option for those seeking a more cost-effective, long-term investment strategy.

Management risk

The performance of active funds heavily relies on the skills and expertise of fund managers. However, not all active managers are created equal, and their performance can vary significantly. Some managers may focus solely on maximising returns without considering the level of risk taken, while others may sacrifice returns to achieve a more stable, risk-adjusted return. It is crucial for investors to understand the investment strategy and risk exposure of the fund manager they choose.

In addition, the classification of funds as "active" or "passive" is not always clear-cut. Some funds categorised as active may closely replicate index weightings, offering little differentiation in their portfolios. This misclassification can occur due to historical reasons or the pursuit of higher fees. As a result, investors may not be getting the level of active management they expect, which can impact the overall performance and risk profile of their investments.

Furthermore, active fund managers may face challenges in consistently outperforming their benchmarks, especially over shorter time horizons. While some managers may deliver strong returns over the long term, they can also experience periods of significant underperformance in the short term. Thus, it is important for investors to evaluate the track record of active fund managers over a longer period to make a more informed decision.

In summary, management risk in active investing stems from the potential for human error, the varying skills and strategies of fund managers, the misclassification of funds, and the challenge of consistently outperforming benchmarks. Investors should carefully consider these factors when deciding whether to invest in actively managed funds.

Active funds may underperform

Secondly, active funds may underperform due to management risk. Fund managers are human and can make costly investing mistakes. Their decisions are based on their analysis and expertise, which may not always be accurate or timely. This is a key difference from passive funds, which follow a specific index and do not rely on the decisions of a fund manager.

Thirdly, active funds may underperform in volatile markets. During market upheavals, active investing can become more popular as it allows investors to react quickly to market changes. However, this also means that active funds may be more susceptible to herd mentality, where investors all make the same decision to sell or buy based on short-term market movements. This can lead to a cascade effect, amplifying market downturns and preventing active managers from helping to stabilize the market.

Finally, active funds may underperform due to their focus on short-term gains. Active investors buy and sell investments based on their short-term performance, attempting to beat average market returns. This differs from passive investors, who take a buy-and-hold approach and invest for the long term. While active investors aim to take advantage of short-term price fluctuations, this strategy may not always pay off and may result in higher transaction costs.

Active investing is time-consuming

Active investing is a hands-on approach to investing that requires a lot of time and effort. It involves actively buying and selling investments based on their short-term performance, with the aim of beating the average market returns. This means that active investors need to constantly monitor their portfolio and make quick decisions about when to buy or sell.

The time-consuming nature of active investing can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, it requires a deep analysis of various factors influencing stock prices, such as company financial statements, industry trends, and market conditions. This analysis can be complex and time-intensive, as investors need to stay up-to-date with the latest information and developments.

Secondly, active investing often involves a team of analysts who examine qualitative and quantitative factors to make informed decisions. Coordinating and managing this team takes time and effort, and the process of gathering and interpreting data can be demanding.

Additionally, active investing requires a dynamic approach where investors need to be ready to pivot into or out of a particular stock, bond, or asset. This means constantly monitoring the performance of investments and being prepared to act quickly, which can be a demanding and time-consuming task.

The time commitment of active investing also extends beyond the initial investment decision. Active investors need to continuously track the performance of their investments and make adjustments as needed. This involves regularly reviewing financial reports, analysing competitors, and staying informed about market trends and news.

Furthermore, active investing may involve a higher level of risk compared to passive investing. Active investors are more susceptible to making costly mistakes, and their decisions can have a significant impact on investment performance. This increased risk profile demands a higher level of attention and time investment to mitigate potential losses.

Active investing is more volatile

Active investing is a hands-on approach to investing that requires a portfolio manager to actively monitor and make decisions about the investments in a portfolio. While this strategy can be beneficial, it is also more volatile than passive investing.

Active investing aims to beat the stock market's average returns and take advantage of short-term price fluctuations. This requires a deeper analysis of investments and the expertise to know when to pivot in or out of a particular stock, bond, or asset. The success of this strategy depends on the portfolio manager's ability to make the right decisions at the right time. If they make a mistake, it can be costly.

One of the main risks of active investing is the potential for higher expenses and fees. Active investing involves more buying and selling, which triggers transaction costs. Additionally, investors are paying the salaries of the analyst team researching equity picks. Over time, these fees can add up and eat into returns.

Another risk is that active investing is more susceptible to market volatility. As active investors are constantly monitoring and reacting to market changes, their investments can be more significantly impacted by minor distortions or declines in the market. This can lead to a "herd mentality", where investors all make the same decisions at the same time, amplifying market moves.

Furthermore, active investing may not always result in higher returns. While it aims to beat the market, this is not always the case. Passive investing, on the other hand, has historically earned more money than active investing. This is because passive investing has lower fees and doesn't try to beat the market but rather aims to replicate its performance.

Finally, active investing requires a high level of expertise and time commitment. Investors need to have a deep understanding of the market and the ability to analyze investments for price changes, returns, and company financial statements. This level of involvement may not be feasible or desirable for all investors.

Frequently asked questions