Challenges Of Due Diligence For Investment Managers

Due diligence is a systematic way to analyse and mitigate risk from an investment decision. It involves examining a company's financial records, including its numbers, comparing them over time, and benchmarking them against competitors. While due diligence is a well-established practice, it is particularly challenging for investment managers due to the sheer number of funds available, the difficulty in verifying managers' claims, and the prevalence of the herd mentality.

Investment managers face the challenge of selecting from a vast array of funds, including mutual funds, ETFs, hedge funds, private equity funds, and more. Additionally, it can be difficult to assess the legitimacy of managers' claims of having an edge over their competitors. These claims are often not backed up by hard evidence, and the due diligence process, which has been reduced to a checklist, does not adequately address this issue.

Furthermore, the herd mentality plays a significant role in investment decisions. Institutional funds often seek recommendations from their peers, and it is rare for anyone to recommend a poorly performing fund or manager. This results in a tendency to follow the crowd, which can lead to missed opportunities and costly mistakes.

To overcome these challenges, investment managers must go beyond performance screens and standard checklists. They need to thoroughly evaluate managers' processes, philosophies, and people, asking the right questions to discern the realism of their claims. Ultimately, due diligence in investment management requires a nuanced approach that looks beyond superficial indicators and marketing materials to make informed decisions.

The sheer number of funds and managers to choose from

Due diligence is a challenging task for investment managers, and the sheer number of funds and managers to choose from is a significant factor in this. The vast array of options includes thousands of mutual funds and ETFs, separately managed accounts targeting institutional clients, hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital, real estate, and infrastructure, among others. The challenge is further exacerbated by the constant emergence of new funds and managers, making it difficult to keep up with the latest offerings and assess their potential.

The abundance of choices can be overwhelming, and the due diligence process becomes crucial in selecting the most promising investments. This process involves evaluating various aspects, such as the fund's strategy, performance, risk management, and the manager's expertise and track record. It requires in-depth research, analysis, and comparisons to make informed decisions.

The due diligence process can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, especially when considering the volume of funds and managers available. It demands a thorough understanding of the investment landscape and the ability to identify the key factors that differentiate one fund from another. Investment managers need to carefully assess each opportunity, weighing the potential benefits against the risks involved.

Additionally, the due diligence process should not be a mere box-ticking exercise. Superficial evaluations can be misleading, and it is important to dig deeper into the specifics of each fund and manager. This includes examining the fund's investment strategy, performance metrics, risk management techniques, and the manager's experience and track record.

The challenge of due diligence is further amplified by the fact that many funds and managers employ sophisticated marketing strategies, making it difficult to discern between genuine performance and clever branding. Distinguishing between funds that have a true edge and those that are simply riding a wave of luck or temporary success can be a daunting task.

In conclusion, the sheer number of funds and managers available presents a significant challenge for investment managers conducting due diligence. The dynamic and ever-growing nature of the investment landscape demands constant vigilance and a rigorous evaluation process. By diligently evaluating each opportunity, investment managers can strive to make informed decisions that align with their investment strategies and goals.

The challenge of assessing a manager's commitment to sustainability

Due diligence is a systematic way to analyze and mitigate risk when making business or investment decisions. When selecting and monitoring external investment managers, it is crucial to understand their credibility in ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) matters. However, assessing a manager's commitment to sustainability is challenging due to the dynamic nature of the field and the interplay of various factors.

Marketing vs Reality

The first challenge is distinguishing genuine commitment to sustainability from mere marketing and greenwashing. With ESG gaining prominence, firms are keen to project an ESG-aware image. While investment managers have made strides in this area, the presence of strong commercial motivations encourages a degree of greenwashing. It can be difficult to look beyond polished marketing materials, mission statements, and sustainability reports. To address this, investors should examine firm-level commitments, accountability measures, and ESG staffing. The analysis must be nuanced, going beyond simplistic scorecards and considering variables such as firm size and asset classes covered.

Policy Substance and Accountability

The second challenge is evaluating the substance of ESG policies and the nature of accountability. While most firms have ESG or responsible investment policies, they vary in detail and specificity. For example, policies may lack asset class-specific guidelines, which are important for ensuring alignment and consistency. Additionally, there is differentiation among firms in terms of internal accountability for these policies. Strong accountability and audit of the ESG approach are crucial for the firm's ability to mitigate greenwashing and demonstrate the importance placed on sustainability by senior leadership.

ESG Resourcing

The third challenge is assessing the adequacy of dedicated ESG resources within the firm. While most asset management firms have dedicated ESG personnel, the size and structure of these teams vary significantly. It is important to understand the roles and interactions of ESG individuals with the investment team. Genuine ESG integration is evident when sector analysts and portfolio managers can enthusiastically describe ESG risks and opportunities without relying solely on the ESG team.

Climate Change Approaches

The fourth challenge is identifying stronger versus weaker approaches to climate change. While many firms have established climate-related targets and initiatives, there is a need to assess the sophistication of their implementation. Investors must consider both the investment and operational aspects, evaluating how climate risks are managed within the investment process and the extent to which targets lead to real-world change.

ESG Integration in Investment Lifecycle

The fifth challenge is ensuring that ESG considerations are integrated throughout the entire investment lifecycle. Investors should examine how managers define the investment universe, incorporate ESG in due diligence, make investment selections, and manage and exit investments. Strong practices include developing ESG data through proprietary analysis, combining it with third-party data, and reflecting ESG considerations in investment decisions. However, some firms overly rely on third-party data or give portfolio managers too much discretion, leading to inconsistent or superficial ESG integration.

Impact Washing

The sixth challenge is cutting through 'impact washing', where strategies are dressed up to appear more impactful than they truly are. Investors need to assess the credibility of the impact process and the manager's ability to balance impact outcomes and financial returns. Impact washing often takes the form of 'SDG washing', where investments are loosely aligned with the UN Sustainable Development Goals without a standardized approach or granular analysis.

In conclusion, assessing a manager's commitment to sustainability is challenging due to the dynamic nature of ESG and the interplay of marketing, policies, resources, climate approaches, integration practices, and impact claims. A nuanced and comprehensive evaluation is necessary to identify genuine commitment and best practices.

The difficulty of judging a manager's character

Judging a manager's character is one of the most important yet challenging aspects of the due diligence process. While it is crucial to evaluate a manager's investment strategy and performance, it is also essential to assess their integrity, honesty, and commitment to sustainability.

Evaluating Integrity and Honesty

When assessing a manager's character, it is vital to determine their level of integrity and honesty. This involves evaluating their personal values, ethical standards, and commitment to transparency. Do they demonstrate a strong sense of moral principles in their decision-making and interactions with stakeholders? Are they open and transparent about their investment strategies, risks, and potential challenges?

Commitment to Sustainability

Another critical aspect of judging a manager's character is their commitment to sustainability and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) factors. This includes assessing whether they have robust policies and practices in place to address climate change, social responsibility, and corporate governance. Are they actively integrating ESG considerations into their investment processes and decision-making? Do they have dedicated ESG personnel or teams, and how effectively do they collaborate with the investment teams?

Track Record and Performance

While past performance is not a guarantee of future results, it is essential to consider when evaluating a manager's character. A long-term proven track record of managing investor capital successfully demonstrates stability, skill, and a deep understanding of the market. However, it is also important to look beyond performance metrics and consider the manager's investment philosophy, strategy, and risk management approach.

Due Diligence Process

Conducting due diligence on a manager's character involves extensive research, interviews, and analysis. This includes reviewing the manager's background, qualifications, and experience, as well as conducting reference checks and analysing their investment track record. It is crucial to go beyond polished marketing materials and mission statements to gain a deeper understanding of the manager's values, ethics, and commitment to sustainability.

Challenges and Limitations

Judging a manager's character can be challenging due to the subjective nature of character evaluation and the potential for bias or misleading information. Managers may present a favourable image during the due diligence process, making it difficult to identify any red flags or inconsistencies. Additionally, the due diligence process can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, requiring a thorough analysis of multiple factors.

In conclusion, judging a manager's character is a critical yet complex aspect of the due diligence process. It involves evaluating their integrity, honesty, and commitment to sustainability, while also considering their track record and investment strategy. A comprehensive due diligence process is essential to making informed decisions and establishing long-term partnerships with managers who align with the organisation's values and goals.

The need to understand complex ESG practices and their integration

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria are increasingly important for investors to understand when selecting and monitoring investment managers. However, assessing managers' ESG credentials is challenging due to the rapid evolution of practices and appearances in this area.

One of the most important and desirable characteristics of an investment manager, from an ESG perspective, is a robust commitment to sustainability that runs throughout the organisation, from senior leadership downwards. However, identifying this commitment is difficult because ESG has become a commercial imperative for asset managers, and greenwashing is common. To assess managers' commitment to sustainability, investors should examine firm-level commitments, accountability, and ESG staffing in detail, being mindful of variables such as firm size and asset classes covered.

Another challenge is ensuring that ESG is integrated throughout the full investment lifecycle, from determining the potential investment universe to concluding an exit/sale. Best practices at each stage of the investment lifecycle vary depending on the asset class, sub-sector, and investment style, so ambiguous process descriptions that are not asset-class-specific should be viewed with caution.

A third challenge is identifying stronger versus weaker approaches to climate change. While many asset managers have established climate-related targets, investors must consider the extent to which these targets are commensurate with managing climate risks within the investment process. Approaches to implementing net-zero targets vary greatly in terms of sophistication, and investors must also consider the extent to which they will be satisfied with the achievement of those targets superficially in their portfolio versus the delivery of 'real-world change' through reducing the carbon footprint of investee companies.

Finally, investors must be able to cut through 'impact washing', where strategies are dressed up to look significantly more impactful than they are. Impact washing often takes the form of 'SDG washing', where managers seek to associate investments with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. While this can be interesting and helpful when done well, there is no standardised approach, and managers have been very creative in aligning companies with SDGs.

The importance of evaluating a manager's ability to balance impact and financial returns

Due diligence is a challenging but critical process in the world of investments, and evaluating a manager's ability to balance impact and financial returns is a crucial aspect of this process. Here are some paragraphs on the importance of this evaluation:

Due diligence is an essential process for investment managers to assess the potential risks and rewards of a particular investment opportunity. It involves a thorough investigation and analysis of financial records, business operations, and market positioning, among other factors. One critical aspect of due diligence is evaluating a manager's ability to balance impact and financial returns. This evaluation is crucial because it provides insight into the manager's skill in navigating the complex relationship between financial performance and societal impact.

Impact investing has gained prominence in recent years, with investors increasingly seeking to generate positive societal and environmental impact alongside financial returns. This shift presents a unique challenge for investment managers, as they must now consider a broader range of factors beyond purely financial metrics. Evaluating a manager's ability to balance impact and financial returns helps assess their understanding of this evolving landscape and their capacity to make effective investment decisions that align with the investor's values and objectives.

A manager's ability to balance impact and financial returns can be assessed through various qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitatively, investors can evaluate a manager's investment philosophy, strategic approach, and decision-making process. This includes analyzing their criteria for selecting investments, their level of expertise and passion for the field, and their ability to adapt to changing market conditions. Quantitatively, investors can examine financial metrics such as profitability ratios, liquidity ratios, and solvency ratios. These metrics provide insight into the financial health and performance of the manager's investments, helping investors understand how well they balance financial returns with impact.

The evaluation of a manager's ability to balance impact and financial returns should also consider the alignment between the manager's values and the investor's goals. Impact investing is inherently value-driven, and investors must ensure that the manager's approach to impact aligns with their own priorities and objectives. This includes assessing the manager's environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policies, their track record in generating positive impact, and their ability to measure and report on the societal outcomes of their investments.

Ultimately, due diligence is a critical process for investment managers, and evaluating a manager's ability to balance impact and financial returns is a key component of this process. By conducting a comprehensive assessment, investors can make more informed decisions, ensuring that their investments are not only financially sound but also aligned with their values and contribute positively to society.

Frequently asked questions