Least Preferred Investment Analysis Techniques By Cfos

Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) are responsible for a range of tasks, from financial planning and analysis to reporting to the Board of Directors. They are also tasked with making investment decisions, which can include fixed assets such as equipment, machinery, or real estate. To do this, CFOs can use a variety of investment analysis techniques, including net present value (NPV) and discounted cash flow (DCF) models. These models help CFOs identify the investments that will yield the highest return on capital. While these techniques are useful, they are not always accurate due to the difficulty of projecting cash flows beyond three to five years and the impact of unexpected events.

Net Present Value (NPV)

NPV is commonly employed in capital budgeting and investment planning to assess a project's projected profitability. It is also used in investment banking and accounting to determine if an investment, project, or business will be profitable in the long run. By adjusting each investment option to the same level of future value, finance professionals can make more informed decisions about how and where to allocate capital.

NPV analysis is valuable for CFOs and corporate finance professionals in several ways. Firstly, it helps determine how much an investment, project, or series of cash flows is worth, taking into account all revenues, expenses, and capital costs. Secondly, it considers the timing of cash flows, which can significantly impact the present value of an investment. NPV analysis also adjusts for the risk of an investment opportunity and accounts for the time value of money.

When making investment decisions, it is essential to consider the limitations of NPV analysis. NPV relies heavily on assumptions, estimates, and long-term projections, which may not always be accurate. Additionally, NPV analysis may not capture secondary and tertiary benefits or impacts on other areas of a business. It assumes a constant discount rate over time, and accurately adjusting for risk can be challenging due to the difficulty of obtaining data on correlations and probabilities.

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)

DCF analysis seeks to establish, through projections of a company's future earnings, the company's real current value. The model relies on the concept of the time value of money, which assumes that a dollar paid in the future is less valuable than a dollar today.

DCF analysis is widely used in investment finance, real estate development, corporate financial management, and patent valuation. It is useful for investors considering whether to acquire a company or buy securities, and it can also assist business owners and managers in making capital budgeting or operating expenditure decisions.

DCF analysis involves three basic steps: forecasting the expected cash flows from the investment, selecting a discount rate, and discounting the forecasted cash flows back to the present day. The discount rate in DCF analysis is the interest rate used when calculating the net present value (NPV) of the investment, and it represents the time value of money from the present to the future.

While DCF models are powerful, they do have some shortcomings. It can be difficult to accurately predict the correct inputs for the model, and small changes in the discount rate and growth rate assumptions can have a significant impact on the valuation. Additionally, DCF analysis relies on estimates of future cash flows, which may prove to be inaccurate. As a result, DCF analysis may be most appropriate for evaluating long-term growth rather than short-term profit potential.

Payback Analysis

The payback period is the amount of time it takes to recover the cost of an investment or the length of time an investor needs to reach a breakeven point. It is a commonly used method to calculate investment returns, helping investors, financial professionals, and corporations make decisions.

The payback period is calculated by dividing the amount of the investment by the annual cash flow. The shorter the payback, the more desirable the investment. Conversely, longer payback periods are less attractive.

For example, if solar panels cost $5,000 to install and save $100 each month, it would take 4.2 years to reach the payback period. This is considered a good payback period, as it can take up to 7-10 years for residential homeowners in the US to break even on their investment.

The payback period is favoured when a company faces liquidity constraints. It can show how long it should take to recover the money laid out for a project. If short-term cash flows are a concern, a short payback period may be preferred over a long-term investment with a higher net present value (NPV).

One of the drawbacks of the payback period is that it disregards the time value of money. It also does not account for what happens after payback occurs, ignoring a project's overall profitability. Due to these limitations, many investors and managers prefer to use NPV as a tool for making investment decisions.

Despite these shortcomings, payback analysis is useful in several scenarios:

• Easy to Calculate: The payback period is simple to understand and can be measured without a calculator or spreadsheet.
• Risk Indicator: By focusing on how easily money can be recovered, it serves as an indicator of relative risk.
• Short-term Liquidity: The method favours ventures that rapidly return money, resulting in higher short-term liquidity.
• Applicable for Limited Investments: For projects with limited investments, a short- payback period method is acceptable.
• ROI-based Results: Payback analysis can demonstrate which investment is better based on ROI, aiding in decision-making.
• Long-term Campaigns: Not all companies want to invest only in the short term. The payback period can show how a project will pay off over time.
• Analyzing Projects: Payback analysis provides a basic understanding of how different projects perform, allowing for better selection.
• Minimum Loss: Shareholders can identify less costly investments with shorter break-even times, minimizing the chance of major losses.

In summary, payback analysis is a straightforward technique to assess the financial viability of investment projects, particularly useful when quick decisions are needed. However, it has limitations, such as disregarding the time value of money and not considering overall profitability.

Throughput Analysis

The primary concept behind throughput analysis is that investment decisions should be evaluated in terms of their impact on the entire system, rather than just the specific area of investment. This is because most production costs are not variable at the level of the individual unit produced. When a unit is manufactured, only the cost of materials is incurred as a variable expense. All other costs are associated with the production process and will be incurred regardless of the level of production. Therefore, the focus should be on the process that produces goods, rather than the goods themselves.

• Throughput: Sales minus totally variable expenses, which is usually sales minus the cost of direct materials and perhaps commissions.
• Operating expenses: All expenses, excluding the totally variable expenses used in calculating throughput. These are the costs required to maintain the production system.
• Investment: The amount of cash invested to increase the capacity of the production system to produce more units.

These concepts can be applied to various financial analysis scenarios using the following formulas:

• Revenue – totally variable expenses = throughput
• Throughput – operating expenses = net profit
• Net profit / investment = return on investment

When altering the production system, these formulas can be used to determine whether the change will be beneficial. This can be done by asking the following questions:

• Is there an incremental increase in throughput?
• Is there an incremental reduction in operating expenses?
• Is there an incremental increase in the return on investment?

Ratio Analysis

There are six types of ratios used in ratio analysis:

• Liquidity ratios: Measure a company's ability to pay off short-term debts as they become due.
• Solvency ratios: Compare a company's debt levels with its assets, equity, and earnings.
• Profitability ratios: Convey how well a company can generate profits from its operations.
• Efficiency ratios: Evaluate how efficiently a company uses its assets and liabilities to generate sales and maximize profits.
• Coverage ratios: Measure a company's ability to make interest payments and other obligations associated with its debts.
• Market prospect ratios: Used by investors to predict earnings and future performance.

While ratios offer useful insights, they should be considered alongside other metrics to obtain a broader picture of a company's financial health.

Frequently asked questions